![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:52:02 -0800, stu857xx wrote:
How about one that flys backwards? A canard gives lift instead of the horizontal stab pushing the tail down. It's been tried a few times in the competition Free Flight model building world. Its easy to to make them fly quite well. I lost one, a 27" McCanard with a TeeDee .010 on it, upward in a thermal. I remember it was quite easy to trim, but had no d/t provision on the plan so I hadn't fitted one: hence it climbing several hundred feet on the glide and disapearing over a hill. Doug Joyce got into the US F1C team with a set of canard models but, whoile the climb was good, they didn't glide as well as conventional layout models. The problem is that the main lifting surface has to operate at a lower AOA than the foreplane because the latter MUST stall first for the aircraft to be stable. This means that in almost all cases the mainplane will be operating at a less than optimal AOA. -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I have a dream. A GPS/SBAS/QZSS dream ! In honour of MLK day. | macpacheco | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | January 19th 11 12:39 AM |
A Dream | franck jeamourra | Piloting | 0 | March 27th 04 07:43 PM |
A dream | franck jeamourra | Simulators | 0 | March 25th 04 12:26 PM |
a dream | franck jeamourra | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 06:27 AM |
a dream | franck jeamourra | Owning | 0 | March 25th 04 06:26 AM |