![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even in a G-103 you can steepen the approach by increasing airspeed with
full spoilers. The drag increases with the square of the airspeed. Mind you it takes a bit of time in ground effect to get rid of the airspeed in something with puny spoilers. But any headwind helps with the groundspeed. The AAIB report does not discuss whether windshear might have overpowered the ailerons or whether Matt attempted to decrease the bank. At a 60° bank there's some 42' of height difference between the wingtips. In active air, that's lots of room for a shear. Landing straight ahead in such conditions would limit the chances of getting into a bank you can't get out of. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To restate RO's question: Considering the pilot's experience, he should have known that the safest option was to land straight ahead. However, he chose a course of action that was less safe, so the question is what may have motivated him?
The convenience factor is the most obvious one, but there may have been one or more other factors at play, such as: The copycat factor, which makes you inclined to copy something that you saw someone else do in a similar situation, without thinking things through. In this case the Discus pilot successfully completed an abbreviated circuit a short time before the accident. This factor was mentioned in the AAIB report. The vanity factor, in the context of which landing straight ahead could have meant an implicit admission that the Discus pilot was more skilful. The improvisation factor 1, whereby prior to taking off the pilot didn't consider all the relevant circumstances (including turbulence, wind shear, etc.) and didn't come up with a definite and well thought-out plan on how to handle different emergency situations, should one arise during the take-off.. The improvisation factor 2, whereby prior to taking off the pilot did consider all the relevant circumstances and did come up with a definite and well thought-out plan on how to handle different emergency situations, should one arise during the take-off, however, upon encountering the emergency situation decided to change his plan. Branko XYU |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Matt Hall MXS | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 6th 11 10:24 PM |
Matt Hall pre Red Bull | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 4 | February 4th 10 11:06 AM |
Here's your competition, Matt | Bertie the Bunyip[_19_] | Piloting | 5 | November 14th 07 09:16 PM |
Matt Lauer at Boeing | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | May 3rd 07 12:10 AM |
Matt Michael | Bruce Hoult | Soaring | 0 | December 27th 05 01:45 AM |