A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Public ADS-B Performance Report Request



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 18, 02:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Public ADS-B Performance Report Request

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:29:56 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy


These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.


Grr I meant 91.225/227 not 21.blah.
  #2  
Old March 7th 18, 04:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 624
Default Public ADS-B Performance Report Request

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 6:02:43 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:29:56 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy


These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.


Grr I meant 91.225/227 not 21.blah.


220, 221... Whatever it takes.
Jim
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTSB crash report, autopsy report- Stevie Ray Vaughan Mark. Piloting 5 March 22nd 20 10:17 PM
America Wills Justice as Freedom for Our Stays The Rightardstates 'No Public Option! No Public Option!' Daryl Naval Aviation 0 May 14th 12 04:40 AM
Accident Report on Blue Angel #6 crash now released to the public Pensacola Beachcomber Aviation Photos 0 January 15th 08 07:42 PM
Public Announcement [email protected] Products 8 September 21st 06 04:43 AM
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance R.T. Owning 22 July 6th 04 08:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.