5th year of living dangerously with LiFePo4 batteries

On 06/05/2018 01:11 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:42:49 -0700, Frank Whiteley wrote:

Sadly, not entirely unrelated to this thread. This was the plane used
in the recent glider tow.

https://electrek.co/2018/06/04/sieme...rototype-fire-
crash-death/



A few years back there were a lot of cheap LiIon batteries on sale as SLA
replacements that turned out not to have a BMS system - just cells in the
case. Obviously, these would be at least as flammable as an SLA of
accidentally shorted.

Replace "at least" with "far more'. SLA's are way down at the bottom of
the list when it comes to flammability.


IIRC these were impossible to distinguish from batteries with a proper BMS
inside the case, so, are they still around and being sold to the unwary?



Not sure what a "proper" BMS board is. There are a variety of functions
that may be included, the data sheets tend to vague on what's in there.
See Wikipedia for a primer.

If the battery can disconnect itself from the terminals in the event of
excessive discharge current, too high of charging voltage, or too low
voltage on discharge, then it requires some high-current switches to do
the job. It's a dangerous assumption to think that a battery must have
those capabilities included.

On Tue, 05 Jun 2018 14:35:42 -0600, kinsell wrote:

Not sure what a "proper" BMS board is. There are a variety of functions
that may be included, the data sheets tend to vague on what's in there.
See Wikipedia for a primer.

I'd say it must have these functions:

- cell-balancing charging management
- low-voltage shut-down
- some sort of high-current limiting
This need not be expensive: I'd accept built-in replaceable fuses
and holders or solid state current limiters that temporarily
disconnect the battery when the load becomes excessive.
Neither are exactly what you'd call new technology.


If the battery can disconnect itself from the terminals in the event of
excessive discharge current, too high of charging voltage, or too low
voltage on discharge, then it requires some high-current switches to do
the job.

Inexpensive built-in fuses can handle that perfectly well.


--
Martin | martin at
Gregorie | gregorie dot org

On 06/05/2018 03:20 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2018 14:35:42 -0600, kinsell wrote:

Not sure what a "proper" BMS board is. There are a variety of functions
that may be included, the data sheets tend to vague on what's in there.
See Wikipedia for a primer.

I'd say it must have these functions:

- cell-balancing charging management
- low-voltage shut-down
- some sort of high-current limiting
This need not be expensive: I'd accept built-in replaceable fuses
and holders or solid state current limiters that temporarily
disconnect the battery when the load becomes excessive.
Neither are exactly what you'd call new technology.

Not new technology, but the switch needs to handle the maximum current
that the battery can be called on to deliver. Many applications are
going to involve more than an amp or two to power a sailplane panel.




If the battery can disconnect itself from the terminals in the event of
excessive discharge current, too high of charging voltage, or too low
voltage on discharge, then it requires some high-current switches to do
the job.

Inexpensive built-in fuses can handle that perfectly well.


Fuses can handle the overcurrent, but disconnecting on high or low
voltage isn't going to be cheap, if the battery is rated for high current.

Richard had an interesting post a while ago, where he accidentally used
the wrong charger on an FLP, and battery was destroyed due to swelling.
So much for the idea of a BMS protecting the battery.

-Dave

On Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:38:36 -0600, kinsell wrote:

Richard had an interesting post a while ago, where he accidentally used
the wrong charger on an FLP, and battery was destroyed due to swelling.
So much for the idea of a BMS protecting the battery.


Using the wrong charger, or a multi-chemistry charger on the wrong
setting, can destroy any battery, regardless of its chemistry.

A BMS probably won't help here because the charger may not trip the max-
voltage switch and the charge balancer is only there to bring any cells
that are under- or over-charged into line with the rest.


--
Martin | martin at
Gregorie | gregorie dot org

One example does not prove all BMS cannot protect the battery.
I see no eveidence that Life is any more prone to failiure than SLA gell cells.

On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 4:25:03 PM UTC-7, wrote:
One example does not prove all BMS cannot protect the battery.
I see no eveidence that Life is any more prone to failiure than SLA gell cells.

If we are rejecting all batteries that can be damaged by connecting to the wrong charger, then we are left with nothing. You can make an SLA explode rather dramatically doing that.