A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

G-loads in WW2



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 04, 01:29 PM
Eunometic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Peter Stickney) wrote in message ...
In article ,
Jay Stranahan writes:
Just mildly curious, because this information doesn't seem to be
available on any of the web sites I visit: What sort of gee forces were
WW2 fighter aircraft built to withstand? I keep hearing stories about
wings coming off in dives or very tight sustained turns -- were they
*that* much more fragile than modern military craft?



The AMericans and British put a _lot_ of effort into figuring out what
wa happening at these speeds, and finding ways for airplanes to
operate safely in this region. This effort let to proper instructions
for pilots to safely maneuver out of the dangerous regions (No nose up
trim, for example, and no recovery likely above some particular
altitude) and systems to allow safe recovery in the Transonic Zone,
such as the Dive Recovery Flap - a small flap on the underside of teh
wing that produced a nose-up moment when deflected, cancelling out the
nose-down pitching moment of teh airfoil. Note that this wasn't a
Dive Brake. It was too small to have enough drag to slow the airplane
down.


The only aircraft that actualy received this dive recovery flap was
the P47M in what must have been early 1945. It was an impressive
aircraft. The P47N might also have had it.



For some reaon, the Germans, for all their pioneering efforts in high
speed flight, did not investigate compressibility phenomenon on any
sort of a sytematic level, and put little or no effort into working
with existing airplane tyoes. Their solution was to put a Big Red
"Thou Shall Not Exceed Susch-and-So an Airspeed at X Meters Altitude"
in the Pilot's Handbook, and leave it at that.


The jets were supposed to be in service in August 1943. Problems in
engine development caused by having to develop low/zero nickel alloys
delayed them. It would seem pointless developing these sorts of
things if the would be of no use in a fast jet.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rag and tube construction and computer models? BllFs6 Home Built 24 April 12th 04 12:20 PM
BUFDRVR - about new squadron structure Jughead Military Aviation 20 November 22nd 03 03:28 PM
Can F-15s making 9G turns with payload? Paul J. Adam Military Aviation 114 September 27th 03 05:47 AM
F-4 chaff/flare loads Bob Martin Military Aviation 25 September 25th 03 03:36 PM
How much turbulence is too much? Marty Ross Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 21st 03 05:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.