A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JU-87 with retractable undercarriage?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 04, 04:47 PM
Hans-Joachim Maximilian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(robert arndt) wrote in message . com...
rb wrote in message ...
I believe that a later model of the Ju-87 was designed with retractable
undercarriage. Probably given a different model number as I think it
might have been a bigger aircraft. I don't believe it ever flew (having
been developed so late in the war). Anyone have any references?
Secondly, why wasn't the original JU-87 ever given retractable
undercarriage, it must have impinged on performance considerably?
cheers
rb


In 1941, work on improving the Ju-87 was started. The new model would
be the Ju-187 with rearward retractable gear, straight tapered wings,
and a 180 degree rotating tail unit that allowed the rear gunner an
unrestricted view for firing the auto-aiming twin MG-151 cannon
turret. Performance would increase in max speed from 186 mph to 242
mph and bombload now up to 4,409 lbs. One full scale mock-up was
completed before the RLM cancelled the project without reason in the
autumn of 1941.

Model:
http://www.hobbytek-idc.co.kr/m200/w...r2/ju187-1.jpg
Mock-up under construction:
http://www.hobbytek-idc.co.kr/m200/w...r2/ju187-3.jpg

Rob




Whatever close support piston-engined dive bomber they created it had
to have near perfect fighter protection. The equation always mandated
that the dive-bombers have protection.

Against badly organized aviation the Germans could be threadbare in
their fighter provision for close support escort duties.

It will not work against even a small air force which has the capacity
to task fighters to specific high value targets of opportunity.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retractable Comm Antenna Ron Wanttaja Home Built 11 September 6th 04 06:59 PM
Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... Chris Home Built 1 February 27th 04 09:23 PM
tricycle undercarriage G. Stewart Military Aviation 26 December 3rd 03 02:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.