![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 1:11:50 PM UTC-5, krasw wrote:
On Saturday, 8 December 2018 12:25:35 UTC+2, wrote: “Do these "phantom" classes give more FAI ranking points to pilots (4 winners instead of 2)? I dont see any other reason for this. “ No. Reading FAI ranking rules it sure does. Pilot quality factor, competition rating all are based on number of good pilots in same class. Put same pilots to multiple classes and you have very good phantom competition that gives a lot of ranking points. Very clever. Where are the ranking rules to be found? Who gets to decide if any given nation's rules are "close enough" to Annex A (or some other gold standard) to merit FAI rankings based on their nationals? T8 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lauantai 8. joulukuuta 2018 22.24.01 UTC+2 Tango Eight kirjoitti:
On Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 1:11:50 PM UTC-5, krasw wrote: On Saturday, 8 December 2018 12:25:35 UTC+2, wrote: “Do these "phantom" classes give more FAI ranking points to pilots (4 winners instead of 2)? I dont see any other reason for this. “ No. Reading FAI ranking rules it sure does. Pilot quality factor, competition rating all are based on number of good pilots in same class. Put same pilots to multiple classes and you have very good phantom competition that gives a lot of ranking points. Very clever. Where are the ranking rules to be found? Who gets to decide if any given nation's rules are "close enough" to Annex A (or some other gold standard) to merit FAI rankings based on their nationals? T8 They are available online, you seriously want help in using google? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 12:58:12 AM UTC-5, krasw wrote:
lauantai 8. joulukuuta 2018 22.24.01 UTC+2 Tango Eight kirjoitti: On Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 1:11:50 PM UTC-5, krasw wrote: On Saturday, 8 December 2018 12:25:35 UTC+2, wrote: “Do these "phantom" classes give more FAI ranking points to pilots (4 winners instead of 2)? I dont see any other reason for this. “ No. Reading FAI ranking rules it sure does. Pilot quality factor, competition rating all are based on number of good pilots in same class. Put same pilots to multiple classes and you have very good phantom competition that gives a lot of ranking points. Very clever. Where are the ranking rules to be found? Who gets to decide if any given nation's rules are "close enough" to Annex A (or some other gold standard) to merit FAI rankings based on their nationals? T8 They are available online, you seriously want help in using google? Merry Christmas to you as well. T8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Try this link http://rankingdata.fai.org/sc3d.pdf Cheers Colin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T8,
US Nationals have been used for FAI ranking over the years if the contest management decides to report the results and pays the associated sanction fees. This has been hit or miss over the years. As an example you can see the FAI ranking for Phil Gaisford who has ranking based on the PanAms in 2015 that is a Category I event he won and then the 2018 US Standard Class Nationals which he also won and is considered a Category II event. As others have said, the ranking of each event changes with the “quality” of competitors. http://rankingdata.fai.org/SGP_displ...p?pilotid=3167 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airbus' Urban Air Mobility Roadmap leads to an electric future | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | June 21st 17 04:50 PM |
Airplane for mobility impaired passenger | Sam940 | Owning | 1 | December 10th 12 08:32 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team Selection Policy Changes | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 84 | September 27th 10 08:03 PM |
Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) Mobility Test Article (MTA) 0401759.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:45 PM |
Swidnik PW-6U Mobility and Fun | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 0 | March 6th 04 04:34 PM |