A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 12th 18, 07:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

Isn't it ironic that the US persists in using the outdated Imperial system of measures inherited from and now discarded by the British, with whom you fought a war for independence, rather than the metric system invented by the French who sent you the Statue of Liberty?
  #2  
Old December 12th 18, 04:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

Not at all.Â* Winning independence from an oppressive government does not
mean that a country must cleanse itself of everything taken from that
government, nor does receiving help from the French in our war of
independence mean that we have to take their form of government,
measurements, literature, etc.Â* What's ironic is that the rest of the
world can't stay out of our business.Â* Everyone hates the USA, yet they
all line up for the benefits to be gained from the US. Take care of
yourselves for a change, pay your own bills for once, and leave us
alone.Â* And you might take the UN with you when you leave.

On 12/12/2018 12:09 AM, wrote:
Isn't it ironic that the US persists in using the outdated Imperial system of measures inherited from and now discarded by the British, with whom you fought a war for independence, rather than the metric system invented by the French who sent you the Statue of Liberty?


--
Dan, 5J
  #3  
Old December 12th 18, 05:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 4:47:47 PM UTC, Dan Marotta wrote:
Not at all.Â* Winning independence from an oppressive government does not
mean that a country must cleanse itself of everything taken from that
government, nor does receiving help from the French in our war of
independence mean that we have to take their form of government,
measurements, literature, etc.Â* What's ironic is that the rest of the
world can't stay out of our business.Â* Everyone hates the USA, yet they
all line up for the benefits to be gained from the US. Take care of
yourselves for a change, pay your own bills for once, and leave us
alone.Â* And you might take the UN with you when you leave.


And you get all that from a gentle observation!? Quite alarming really.
  #5  
Old December 12th 18, 07:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Whelan[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 400
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

Entire prologue snipped...

This is the kind of isolationism that worked quite well.

until December 7, 1941.


Sheesh...

Your point being George Santayana was correct in observing that those who fail
to learn the lessons of history are destined to repeat it?

Lessee...prior to"isolationism" - (You stay out or our face, and we'll stay
out of yours.) - there was a whole lot of appeasement to go around on the
European continent...after a decade or so of the League of Nations ignoring
more-or-less-global (e.g. Asia/Africa) aggressions...which was clearly the
United States' fault since the very idea of the League can be laid at Woodrow
Wilson's feet...after the European (and here I include the European part of
Czarist Russia) continent went nuts over an overly exuberant burst of
nationalism in the Balkans...

I think savvy readers get the idea. It shouldn't be necessary to nod toward
the fact United States forces bailed out Europe's squabbling butts twice (in
both global conflicts). But, hey, RASidents can all look on the bright side:
WW-I arguably led to the development of soaring as we know it today!

Looks like it may be a long northern winter on RAS...

Bob W.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

  #6  
Old December 12th 18, 09:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jonathan St. Cloud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,463
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 11:33:05 AM UTC-8, Bob Whelan wrote:
Entire prologue snipped...

This is the kind of isolationism that worked quite well.

until December 7, 1941.


Sheesh...

Your point being George Santayana was correct in observing that those who fail
to learn the lessons of history are destined to repeat it?

Lessee...prior to"isolationism" - (You stay out or our face, and we'll stay
out of yours.) - there was a whole lot of appeasement to go around on the
European continent...after a decade or so of the League of Nations ignoring
more-or-less-global (e.g. Asia/Africa) aggressions...which was clearly the
United States' fault since the very idea of the League can be laid at Woodrow
Wilson's feet...after the European (and here I include the European part of
Czarist Russia) continent went nuts over an overly exuberant burst of
nationalism in the Balkans...

I think savvy readers get the idea. It shouldn't be necessary to nod toward
the fact United States forces bailed out Europe's squabbling butts twice (in
both global conflicts). But, hey, RASidents can all look on the bright side:
WW-I arguably led to the development of soaring as we know it today!

Looks like it may be a long northern winter on RAS...

Bob W.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com


Exactly, "Your point being .. was correct in observing that those who fail
to learn the lessons of history are destined to repeat it..."

Time and time again history has shown when you start a moral, political, social debate on a SOARING newsgroup you are bringing the rest of the group into discussion they did not sign up for, so let us respect the other members of the group, and conduct ourselves accordingly! Another little know fact, it is entirely possible to let a small quip about another's country go unchallenged as in this group most likely it was issued in jest. Happy Christmas spirit all!
  #8  
Old December 13th 18, 02:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 624
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 5:19:23 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:
Yup and we fixed all of that, too, and propped up Europe and Japan for a
long time afterward.Â* Sheesh get over the US envy.

On 12/12/2018 11:24 AM, R. Suppards wrote:
At 17:40 12 December 2018, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 4:47:47 PM UTC, Dan Marotta wrote:
Not at all.=C2=A0 Winning independence from an oppressive government
does=
not=20
mean that a country must cleanse itself of everything taken from

that=20
government, nor does receiving help from the French in our war of=20
independence mean that we have to take their form of government,=20
measurements, literature, etc.=C2=A0 What's ironic is that the rest of
th=
e=20
world can't stay out of our business.=C2=A0 Everyone hates the USA, yet
t=
hey=20
all line up for the benefits to be gained from the US. Take care of=20
yourselves for a change, pay your own bills for once, and leave us=20
alone.=C2=A0 And you might take the UN with you when you leave.
=20
And you get all that from a gentle observation!? Quite alarming really.

This is the kind of isolationism that worked quite well.

until December 7, 1941.



--
Dan, 5J


Nice try, Jonathan.
What a load of rubbish this has turned into!
Is the LX8000 sensor working properly yet?
Jim
  #9  
Old December 13th 18, 10:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nick Hoare[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

Worth bearing in mind that the OAT signal actually goes to the vario and
not the LX main unit.

The spec of the probe was changed a few years ago when some new vario types
were introduced (we had to fit a new probe when we upgraded to the V9
vario) so if you have changed the vario recently you may have the wrong
probe.

Also make sure the probe cable hasn't been cut and repaired, my
understanding is that you can't do this as it changes the resistance of the
unit and throws the readings off so if it has you need a new probe.




  #10  
Old December 13th 18, 09:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Deming Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default LXNAV 8000 OAT Incorrect

Nope not yet.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US 1986-08800 VC-25A as 82-8000.jpg Joseph Testagrose Aviation Photos 0 April 20th 15 12:46 PM
LX 8000 problem Philip van de Donk Soaring 0 February 24th 14 11:03 AM
Politically Incorrect, Historically Accurate Hymnals Bill Kambic Naval Aviation 0 November 10th 08 10:32 PM
Warning: GPS data incorrect Cheetah236 Instrument Flight Rules 17 September 23rd 05 07:50 AM
Incorrect Coastlines..Channel Islands....HELP !!!! Derek Simulators 0 March 23rd 05 11:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.