![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Easy question but no easy answers.
Turn performance is going to depend on gross weight, configuration, and density altitude. It all boils down to drag and engine performance...so clean configurations, low fuel weights, and low density altitudes are required to get max performance. Unfortunately, we seldom had these when turn performance counted...we were usually heavy and relatively high...so much of this is just an academic discussion. As Ed pointed out, corner is the most g for the min speed. I might add that there is no "one" corner speed. Corner varies with the three variables I mentioned above. Most of our energy maneuverability (EM) diagrams were based on optimistic conditions (relatively clean and 1/2 internal fuel). From these, here are some generalizations. 1. Corner velocities varied from the high 300s to the high 400s (indicated airspeed...we didn't think in terms of TAS or mach, again as Ed said)...and this varied with aircraft type, weight, and altitude. 2. Max g in the F-4 was 8.5...but you had to be running practically on fumes to be able to get there without over-g'ing the jet. 3. A slatted F-4 at about 420KIAS could hit a little over 20 degrees per second in instantaneous turn rate...but could not sustain this. A relatively clean F-4E(S) at 39000+ lbs and 5000' MSL could sustain about 7.5 g's...but had to be at about 525KIAS to do this. Sustained g in the lower 400s dropped off to around 6g for these conditions. 4. I haven't flown the F-8 but I would imagine its numbers would be similar but attained a slightly slower speeds. 5. An interesting comparison is the F-104G. Under similar conditions, the Zipper had a lesser instantaneous g capability...about 15 dps (lower placard g limit) but a higher sustained capability (around 10-12dps, depending on which EM diagram you want to believe). Corner for the 104 was about 420KIAS under 10,000'MSL and best 0 Ps was at about 500KIAS or so. These numbers and observations come from personal experience in the jets and moldy old EM diagrams! Andy Bush "Wolfhenson" wrote in message om... I have recently red that instantenious rate of turn of Vietnam vintage supersonic fighters is less than 15 deg/sec. What are the excat figures for F-4, F-105 and F-8? Please include speed and altitude. Nemanja Vukicevic student of aircreft engineering |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 30th 04 06:20 PM |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Home Built | 0 | October 30th 04 06:19 PM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
US (Brit/Japanese/German/USSR) Use of Gun Cameras in Fighters?? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 3 | July 17th 03 06:02 AM |
CUrtiss Hawk 75 performance debate | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 3 | July 16th 03 10:45 AM |