![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:46:10 PM UTC-4, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 6:44:42 PM UTC-7, Mike Schumann wrote: skyBeacon is a pretty darn inexpensive and easy to implement way to make a tow plane 2020 compliant. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant number of people don't go that route, even though it is UAT instead of 1090ES. That would be the stupidest thing in the world. "significant number".... bull****. There are very few towplanes anywhere that I know of that are planning to equip with ADS-B Out for 2020 compliance reasons. I'm not aware of any of them going UAT, I had one question asked months ago and that person went away understanding why to use 1090ES Out not UAT. I only hear about ADS-B Out installs that folks ask for help with, but by now I'd hope that enough people know to keep UAT away from PowerFLARM equipped gliders. The stupidest thing in the world is that PowerFlarm doesn't support ADS-R or TIS-B. The fact of the matter is that UAT exists in the US and a significant number of GA aircraft are going to use this technology whether or not they are tow planes. We have 30+ gliders operating out of Stanton MN, within the MSP Mode C veil. At least half of the mid-air threats are not gliders, but other GA aircraft operating in our airspace. Not only do gliders need to be visible to this traffic, but they should also be equipped with real, US standards compliant ADS-B IN receivers (preferably dual frequency) so they can see all of the non-glider traffic in the area. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 8:43:50 AM UTC-5, Mike Schumann wrote:
The stupidest thing in the world is that PowerFlarm doesn't support ADS-R or TIS-B. That was a mistake and as I understand it a long story. I hope they find a way to fix it, but the US is a tiny market. The only dumber mistake was the US deploying UAT instead of sunsetting Mode C transponders and adopting 1090ES exclusively like Europe. UAT causes innumerable problems in the airspace - as evidenced by this discussion. ADS-R is not a panacea either - you have to be within range of an ADS-B ground station. We made a fork in the Stratux code to put out NMEA for glider instruments. It works but the mixing of all the different sources made de-duplicating targets quite challenging. For goodness sake if you are going to put ADS-B in an aircraft that tows, put in 1090ES. There aren't going to be any UAT gliders out there and a tiny fraction of powered aircraft will have UAT - especially true if you fly any where near a commercial airport. If you're worried about the stray UAT target, get a dual-band receiver. Thanks Urban for the clarification. Nature abhors a vacuum and then people tend to connect the dots in the most pathological way possible. Andy Blackburn PowerFLARM, Trig TT-22 with 1090ES Out |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You are back whining about stuff we all know about and we can't change. We live in an imperfect world with an imperfect technology. But as I've said before here, perfect is the enemy of good and the goal we all should have is to help reduce risks and improve safety. To that point it would be incredibly stupid to be operating a UAT Out equipped towplane where there is a fleet of PowerFLARM equipped gliders. There is just no way to sugar coat that stupidity. And again you are using examples of Stanton MN. Sounds like there are lots of traffic concerns there. If so some of the GA traffic risks should be able to be reduced today by equipping gliders and towplanes with transponders. If it is such a problem I would hope there is 100% transponder carriage. On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 6:43:50 AM UTC-7, Mike Schumann wrote: On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:46:10 PM UTC-4, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 6:44:42 PM UTC-7, Mike Schumann wrote: skyBeacon is a pretty darn inexpensive and easy to implement way to make a tow plane 2020 compliant. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant number of people don't go that route, even though it is UAT instead of 1090ES. That would be the stupidest thing in the world. "significant number"..... bull****. There are very few towplanes anywhere that I know of that are planning to equip with ADS-B Out for 2020 compliance reasons. I'm not aware of any of them going UAT, I had one question asked months ago and that person went away understanding why to use 1090ES Out not UAT. I only hear about ADS-B Out installs that folks ask for help with, but by now I'd hope that enough people know to keep UAT away from PowerFLARM equipped gliders. The stupidest thing in the world is that PowerFlarm doesn't support ADS-R or TIS-B. The fact of the matter is that UAT exists in the US and a significant number of GA aircraft are going to use this technology whether or not they are tow planes. We have 30+ gliders operating out of Stanton MN, within the MSP Mode C veil. At least half of the mid-air threats are not gliders, but other GA aircraft operating in our airspace. Not only do gliders need to be visible to this traffic, but they should also be equipped with real, US standards compliant ADS-B IN receivers (preferably dual frequency) so they can see all of the non-glider traffic in the area. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lot of people calling each other stupid on here....
I’ve installed a lot of different ADS-B out systems. If it was my personal power airplane I would put in an ESGi transponder. I was recently involved in a Trig ADS-B out transponder installation. It’s a very elegant solution for a glider. If I was going to put an UAT system in it would probably be a GDL 82. The skyBeacon is quick, easy and cheap but I would worry about the impact of the lawsuit between Garmin and uAvionix. A skyBeacon would be better then nothing in a tow plane. I’ve had more close calls with power planes while towing and flying gliders then with other gliders. Installed the skyBeacon is around $2,000 compared to the ESGi’s $5,000. My experienced 2 cents |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 9:01:06 PM UTC-7, Charles Longley wrote:
Lot of people calling each other stupid on here.... I’ve installed a lot of different ADS-B out systems. If it was my personal power airplane I would put in an ESGi transponder. I was recently involved in a Trig ADS-B out transponder installation. It’s a very elegant solution for a glider. If I was going to put an UAT system in it would probably be a GDL 82. The skyBeacon is quick, easy and cheap but I would worry about the impact of the lawsuit between Garmin and uAvionix. A skyBeacon would be better then nothing in a tow plane. I’ve had more close calls with power planes while towing and flying gliders then with other gliders. Installed the skyBeacon is around $2,000 compared to the ESGi’s $5,000. My experienced 2 cents I have no idea where you fly gliders and how many of those are PowerFLARM equipped. Please lets not paint the picture that it's a $2k vs $5k price difference for UAT vs 1090ES in a towplane. An Appareo Stratus ESG at ~$3k is a better comparison, including because you are comparing the price of a UAT Out only skyBeacon to a 1090ES Out/Dual-link In packaged ESGi. Another good choice is Garmin GTX-335 ~$3k (with integral GPS option) or so plus install. Maybe better with support and service availability. Like the Stratus ESG, it is Mode S/1090ES Out with integral GPS. I am not sure how many tow pilots want ADS-B traffic-in or how many tow plane owners want to pay for that. One of Appareo's great service to GA has been pushing Garmin down on GTX-335 pricing. That extra $1k - $1.5k should not be a huge difference to go with the non-stupid for PowerFLARM compatibility option. And it seem some towplanes in areas where ADS-B Out may be needed by them after January 1 2020, have aging mode C transponders (like crusty old KT76), so there is likely a benefit in those owners upgrading to a new transponder as part of any upgrade. To quantify that, a towplane owner could say upgrade to a more modern used GTX-330 Mode C transponder for ~$500-$1k or so. So in those cases a GTX-335 or ESG transponder for 1090ES Out and skyBeacon UAT Out effective cost likely gets close. And a Mode S+1090ES transponder in a towplane as part of an ADS-B Out upgrade is even nicer to have near high-density PowerFLARM operations to help avoid spurious Mode C PCAS alerts that Mode C equipped towplanes can cause. Interesting comment on the lawsuit. I'm not a fan of the skyBeacon or Garmin headless setups, would prefer direct hardwired control of squawk and other settings and access to other controls on the panel. I wonder how skyBeacons are going to work in rental aircraft if somebody messes with the settings vis their iPhone and the next pilot renting it can't even see what stuff is set to. You naturally get better usability with integrated transponder solutions... but thats more a connivence not the main reason to go there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All good points!
I fly out of Arlington, WA about half the time. It can be a F-ing zoo! Every type of airplane you can think of at an uncontrolled airport. The cost of install between the skyBeacon and ESG/ESGi is significant. $180 for the skyBeacon and $1200 to $1500 for the ESGi. I don’t recommend doing the ESG even if you have a portable ADS-B in/AHRS device. For an extra $500 with the ESGi you get it all hardwired and out of sight. A renter couldn’t mess with the skyBeacon as it’s password protected. Interestingly you can turn the Nav and strobe light off on the ground with the app. (Found that out the hard way.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thread drift warning
![]() It was by far the simplest install and the only cost is the 337 paperwork, and a friend IA did that for me. We arent planning on flying in controlled airspace or out of the country so couldn't justify the higher expense of 1080es and replacing the AT150 transponder. I know of many that have and are going the skybeacon route. CH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand powerflarm does not detect UAT due to hardware limitation. It would be great if powerflarm would provide an upgrade path to receive UAT, giving that UAT seem to get more and more popular in USA GA thanks to skybeacon. Even an exchange program will do.
Ramy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 9:18:36 PM UTC-4, Ramy wrote:
I understand powerflarm does not detect UAT due to hardware limitation. It would be great if powerflarm would provide an upgrade path to receive UAT, giving that UAT seem to get more and more popular in USA GA thanks to skybeacon. Even an exchange program will do. Ramy The simplest option would be for PowerFlarm to utilize an off the shelf dual band ADS-B receiver like the pingUSB (https://uavionix.com/products/pingusb/) for the ADS-B IN capability and merge that data with the internally received FLARM information. The pingUSB sells for $175 and supports ADS-R and TIS-B. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 7:49:14 PM UTC-7, Mike Schumann wrote:
On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 9:18:36 PM UTC-4, Ramy wrote: I understand powerflarm does not detect UAT due to hardware limitation. It would be great if powerflarm would provide an upgrade path to receive UAT, giving that UAT seem to get more and more popular in USA GA thanks to skybeacon. Even an exchange program will do. Ramy The simplest option would be for PowerFlarm to utilize an off the shelf dual band ADS-B receiver like the pingUSB (https://uavionix.com/products/pingusb/) for the ADS-B IN capability and merge that data with the internally received FLARM information. The pingUSB sells for $175 and supports ADS-R and TIS-B. I have corresponded with Flarm and LX nav. Per the copied messages and still waiting for a reply from LX Navigation, The new OEM chip from Flarm support the things you are asking for. Flarm is not currently offering their own solution for consumers but may in the future. LX Nav is doing some of the support but not using the Flarm chip that does it all, so must have some proprietary implementation and don't appear to support TIS-R. LX Navigation is using Flarm's new chip but has been unresponsive to my inquiries. My message to Flarm:: I live and fly in the USA. Are you planning to come out with a new product that incorporates your new oem chip with ADS-B, Mode-S, ADS-R and TIS-B receiver at 1090 MHz? and also the Mode C and S PCAS capabilities? I have communicated with LX Nav and they indicated they are not implementing TIS-B. LX Navigation tells it's dealer here in the USA that they are implementing TIS-B and ADSB-R. But give no availability information. They have not responded to my inquiries. Any insight you can provide me would be appreciated. I am currently using a PortableFlarm. but will need to give that up when I sell my old glider and would like to get the latest for the new(to me) motorglider. Bruce And their reply:: Hi Bruce That's correct: LX Navigation has implemented the required hardware and will see support for TIS-R and ADS-R after the software upgrade, likely in summer 2019. - Urban Also in another message they indicated that they will not be supporting UAT.. Bruce BD |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
trying to work out how you connect the flarm view 57 to mini box flarm running a V7 and Oudie | Michael Marshall[_2_] | Soaring | 3 | April 10th 16 04:13 AM |
trying to work out how you connect the flarm view 57 to mini box flarm running a V7 and Oudie | Michael Marshall[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 16 08:57 PM |
Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm | [email protected] | Soaring | 28 | March 12th 16 04:31 AM |
Flarm IGC files on non-IGC certified Flarm? | Movses | Soaring | 21 | March 16th 15 09:59 PM |
Military Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD): Assessing Future Needs | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 05 04:35 PM |