A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Undershoot Vs. Overshoot airport landing accidents



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 18th 19, 10:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jonathon May
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 82
Default Undershoot Vs. Overshoot airport landing accidents

At 21:14 18 April 2019, Paul Agnew wrote:
Lots of great insight to digest...Dive and Drag is an interesting
solution,=
if you have enough runway to scrub off the excess speed

and/or your
spoile=
rs are effective. My ASW19 stock spoilers are just not effective

enough
for=
me to try the Dive and Drag method.=20

Reverse Base Method =3D 180=C2=B0 turn to reverse +

90=C2=B0 turn to final
=
=3D 270=C2=B0 (two turns & wind corrections).

Why not just make a stable, descending 270=C2=B0 turn when

crossing the
fin=
al? In powered, fixed-wing aircraft, it's not unusual to get

assigned a
ri=
ght or left 270 to final by tower to improve spacing on departing
aircraft.=
It's a basic ground reference maneuver that could be adapted

for gliders
s=
o you roll out aligned with the runway.

We're supposed to be able to turn back to land above 200ft with

a rope
brea=
k, which is based on our collective understanding that we can

safely
execut=
e a turn, maintain speed, and align with the runway from that

minimum
altit=
ude. That requires 180=C2=B0 of turn, if the towplane drifted

downwind and
=
you turn into the wind (ideal, but our guys don't). Or, 210-

270=C2=B0
total=
if you have to reverse course, angle for the runway, then turn

back to
ali=
gn with the runway. The second scenario requires multiple, low-

altitude
tur=
ns. Is that ideal?=20

Performing a stable, 270=C2=B0 or 360=C2=B0 turn for

altitude correction
sh=
ould be within out skillset, but only if the excessive altitude is

above a
=
certain threshold for your ship. 100-200ft high? Maybe not the

best
option.=
Clear knowledge of your ship's descent rate in a turn is critical

for
deci=
sion making. =20

That said, I've always been successful with a little slip to correct

for
an=
y excess altitude. Starting the correction on the base leg and

performing
a=
slipping turn to final burns off a lot of excess altitude. (I

learned to
d=
o this with Phil Beale on my CFI-A checkride back in 1986.)=20

Paul A.
Jupiter, FL



When we flew K7 and K13 you could dive against the brakes,
provided you open the air brakes about 50kn then lowered the
nose the speed gain was not too high.If you put on 70Kn then
opened the airbrakes the speed would not reduce much.
However if you try that in a Mk 1 Duo discus you will be zooming
down the runway at 120+kn waiting for the boundary fence.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preventing Landing Accidents Glider Safety Webinar Tom[_12_] Soaring 0 January 18th 12 06:49 PM
Overshoot in Honduras? Mike Isaksen Piloting 12 June 2nd 08 01:53 PM
Hawk overshoot [1/1] Peter Twydell Aviation Photos 0 March 25th 08 07:20 PM
Preventing Landing Accidents DVD [email protected] Soaring 0 March 26th 07 04:56 PM
Preventing Landing Accidents Video Thomas Knauff Soaring 0 March 21st 04 02:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.