Swift Boat Veterans For Truth: Are They Going To Sink John Kerry?

"Michael Wise" wrote in message
...

I live in SF and I can tell you Bush has never been here since becoming
president. What better source of information is there demonstrating me
to be incorrect???


You wrote:

"And that record will not include the loss of 2+ million jobs; starting a
war based on lies; ignoring large chunks of his own country; and generally
being unfit to lead a Boyscout pack...much less the country."

What in hell has any of that to do with living in San Francisco?

In article t,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


I live in SF and I can tell you Bush has never been here since becoming
president. What better source of information is there demonstrating me
to be incorrect???

"And that record will not include the loss of 2+ million jobs; starting a
war based on lies; ignoring large chunks of his own country; and generally
being unfit to lead a Boyscout pack...much less the country."

What in hell has any of that to do with living in San Francisco?



The relevant passage for that is "ignoring large chunks of his own
country." SF is just one example. NYC is another...that is until 9/11
when Bush all of the sudden seemed to care about the city and people his
admin/campaign had ignored throughout his campaign and well into his
presidency.


--Mike

"Michael Wise" wrote in message
...

The relevant passage for that is "ignoring large chunks of his own
country." SF is just one example. NYC is another...that is until 9/11
when Bush all of the sudden seemed to care about the city and people his
admin/campaign had ignored throughout his campaign and well into his
presidency.


It is irrelevant to what we were discussing. Follow the thread.

Michael Wise wrote:

The relevant passage for that is "ignoring large chunks of his own
country." SF is just one example. NYC is another...that is until 9/11
when Bush all of the sudden seemed to care about the city and people his
admin/campaign had ignored throughout his campaign and well into his
presidency.


This from a guy who's already admitted he has no idea if any past President
visited NYC in his first 8 months. This guy fits nicely into the "Everything
Bush does is bad/wrong" catagory. Had Bush visited NYC in February 2001, this
guy would be arguing that 9/11 happened because Bush was too busy running
around the country.Sad.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

In article ,
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

The relevant passage for that is "ignoring large chunks of his own
country." SF is just one example. NYC is another...that is until 9/11
when Bush all of the sudden seemed to care about the city and people his
admin/campaign had ignored throughout his campaign and well into his
presidency.


This from a guy who's already admitted he has no idea if any past President
visited NYC in his first 8 months.


I said nothing of the sort. I said I have not in the past paid
particular attention as to when presidents pay business visits to NYC.
Bush stood out by his conspicuous avoidance of it (as well as
California)...at least until it suited him to mug for the camera with
real heroes at Ground Zero.


This guy fits nicely into the "Everything
Bush does is bad/wrong" catagory. Had Bush visited NYC in February 2001, this
guy would be arguing that 9/11 happened because Bush was too busy running
around the country.Sad.


I have not not now nor have I ever claimed that Bush (or any other US
president, for that matter) has any blame for what happened on 9/11...so
you can pack your straw man up.



--Mike

Michael Wise wrote:

I said I have not in the past paid
particular attention as to when presidents pay business visits to NYC.
Bush stood out by his conspicuous avoidance of it (as well as
California)...at least until it suited him to mug for the camera with
real heroes at Ground Zero.

So because Bush, during his first 8 months, did not visit NYC, he should have
not visted after 9/11? That's a joke and you know it. Had Bush failed to show
up, you would have taken issue with this. Furthermore, you cannot provide any
evidence that every other President visited NYC within their first 8 months in
office. So...as far as you know, Bush's actions, in regards to visiting NYC are
no different than any other President. This is the sad, typical unfairness I
spoke about earlier.

I have not not now nor have I ever claimed that Bush (or any other US
president, for that matter) has any blame for what happened on 9/11...so
you can pack your straw man up.

No, you didn't claim he was responsible, but had Bush, during his first 8
months in office visited NYC and San Fran, you would have complained about his
lack of activity at the White House. As it stands now, you are complaining
about his lack of travel to NYC (within his 1st 8 months) without any proof
that any other President has done that.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"