Greatest Strategic Air Missions

Keith Willshaw wrote:

Incorrect, the militarists in charge wanted to hold out for a
deal that would leave them in control of Korea, Taiwan
and Manchuria.

Right, I suppose they wanted Alaska and Siberia as well.

--
Regards,

Venik

Visit my site: http://www.aeronautics.ru
If you need to e-mail me, please use the following subject line:
?Subject=Newsgr0ups_resp0 nse

Venik wrote:
Keith Willshaw wrote:

Incorrect, the militarists in charge wanted
to hold out for a
deal that would leave them in control of Korea,
Taiwan
and Manchuria.

Right, I suppose they wanted Alaska and Siberia
as well.

--
Regards,

Venik

Visit my site: http://www.aeronautics.ru
If you need to e-mail me, please use the following
subject line:
?Subject=Newsgr0ups_resp 0nse
If they had won, yes. But they didn't. They lost. Period. And Several of
the militarists got their necks stretched at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial in
1948.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

Matt Wiser wrote:

If they had won, yes. But they didn't. They lost. Period. And Several of
the militarists got their necks stretched at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial in
1948.

I am not sure what you were trying to say, but I liked it, so keep it up.

--
Regards,

Venik

Visit my site: http://www.aeronautics.ru
If you need to e-mail me, please use the following subject line:
?Subject=Newsgr0ups_resp0 nse

"Venik" wrote in message
...
Keith Willshaw wrote:

Incorrect, the militarists in charge wanted to hold out for a
deal that would leave them in control of Korea, Taiwan
and Manchuria.

Right, I suppose they wanted Alaska and Siberia as well.


In fact they invaded parts of both so thats a good guess but
they were prepared to settle for the Empire pre 1936

Keith