![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 2:58:23 PM UTC-7, Charles Longley wrote:
FAR 91.707 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate a civil aircraft between Mexico or Canada and the United States without filing an IFR or VFR flight plan, as appropriate. You don’t need a clearance to enter US airspace Tom. Just file a VFR flight plan. There’s no ADIZ between Canada and the US by the way. Personally I think you’re jealous.... LOL! Jealous? Hardly. Based on what I read on the FAA's website, a landing at a port of entry was required, which Chester did not do. It is the FAA's website that is, apparently, wrong or inaccurate. I am awaiting a call back from my local FSDO on this issue. Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty sure they’ll find no wrong doing. Having said that. You are a total dick!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 3:43:11 PM UTC-7, Charles Longley wrote:
Pretty sure they’ll find no wrong doing. Having said that. You are a total dick! And it's been a pleasure talking with you, too! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Based on what I read on the FAA's website, a landing at a port of entry was required" Are they giving you a tow as well for your flight back to CA, after you've landed and cleared your customs? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 5:07:18 PM UTC-6, Marton KSz wrote:
"Based on what I read on the FAA's website, a landing at a port of entry was required" Are they giving you a tow as well for your flight back to CA, after you've landed and cleared your customs? https://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/sai...arcus/arcus-m/ Smarten up. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 22:10 25 July 2019, 2G wrote:
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 2:58:23 PM UTC-7, Charles Longley wrote: FAR 91.707 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate a civil aircraf= t between Mexico or Canada and the United States without filing an IFR or V= FR flight plan, as appropriate. =20 You don=E2=80=99t need a clearance to enter US airspace Tom. Just file a = VFR flight plan. There=E2=80=99s no ADIZ between Canada and the US by the w= ay. =20 Personally I think you=E2=80=99re jealous.... LOL! Jealous? Hardly. Based on what I read on the FAA's website, a landing at a port of entry was= required, which Chester did not do. It is the FAA's website that is, appar= ently, wrong or inaccurate. I am awaiting a call back from my local FSDO on= this issue. Tom What a total dickhead -FFS what does it matter to you? - still grieving over 1812?, some Canuck did you wrong in the past??..... with guys like you around no wonder soaring is in decline. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 4:15:05 PM UTC-7, Paul T wrote:
At 22:10 25 July 2019, 2G wrote: On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 2:58:23 PM UTC-7, Charles Longley wrote: FAR 91.707 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate a civil aircraf= t between Mexico or Canada and the United States without filing an IFR or V= FR flight plan, as appropriate. =20 You don=E2=80=99t need a clearance to enter US airspace Tom. Just file a = VFR flight plan. There=E2=80=99s no ADIZ between Canada and the US by the w= ay. =20 Personally I think you=E2=80=99re jealous.... LOL! Jealous? Hardly. Based on what I read on the FAA's website, a landing at a port of entry was= required, which Chester did not do. It is the FAA's website that is, appar= ently, wrong or inaccurate. I am awaiting a call back from my local FSDO on= this issue. Tom What a total dickhead -FFS what does it matter to you? - still grieving over 1812?, some Canuck did you wrong in the past??..... with guys like you around no wonder soaring is in decline. Following the FARs is not optional. Pilots who violate them can impact ALL of us, including you. I wonder how that inspector will react when you call him/her a "dickhead?" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dickhead. Are you waiting for a response from the FSDO so you can tattle? At least he went back to where he came from, and by choice. Different situation down here on the southern border of the US.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Welllll.....Â* I think it was a pretty decent flight.Â* Congrats!
And, as to landing at a port of entry to clear customs, I'd bet that's only required if you intend to land in the country, not fly over it. On 7/25/2019 7:17 PM, wrote: Dickhead. Are you waiting for a response from the FSDO so you can tattle? At least he went back to where he came from, and by choice. Different situation down here on the southern border of the US. -- Dan, 5J |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, 5J
And, as to landing at a port of entry to clear customs, I'd bet that's only required if you intend to land in the country, not fly over it. My understanding is the same; there is a difference between 'entering the U..S.' and 'flying in U.S. airspace'. International airports are good examples to represent these two concepts: "The international zone in an international airport is the area where arriving international passengers have not formally entered the country by clearing arrival customs and immigration controls" - but they flew through the airspace, for sure. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
canadian flight plan advice for a U.S. pilot | Cirrus | Piloting | 9 | October 29th 06 09:10 PM |
Classic RAS posts: Chip Bearden and "pilot relief" | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 5 | February 20th 04 03:59 AM |
bushies file illegal flight plan | Gordon | Naval Aviation | 33 | January 13th 04 08:05 PM |
bushies file illegal flight plan | Bob Dornier | Military Aviation | 19 | December 10th 03 03:29 AM |
bushies file illegal flight plan | JamesF1110 | Naval Aviation | 1 | December 8th 03 12:06 AM |