![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooks wrote:
Yeah, but they did NOT have plenty of fighters stationed forward to use that fuel to deal with the invasion force. They had retained the bulk of their fighter force to protect against the strategic onslaught against Germany, Absolutely, I used ground air defense assets as an example of syphoned resources, but fighters were just as big a factor. and IIRC by the summer of 1944 they were already suffering the strategic campaign's attrition effects in terms of training of replacement pilots to take the place of those they had lost, a large part of which were lost defending against the 8th AF and RAF BC. Absolutely. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... Brooks wrote: Yeah, but they did NOT have plenty of fighters stationed forward to use that fuel to deal with the invasion force. They had retained the bulk of their fighter force to protect against the strategic onslaught against Germany, Absolutely, I used ground air defense assets as an example of syphoned resources, but fighters were just as big a factor. IIRC, their Wehrmacht units of 1944 *were* understrength in terms of both equipment and manpower--they had been forced to cut the number of sub-units in divisions, Panzer and Panzer-Grenadier divisions did not have near the number of tanks they had in previous years, etc. Given that the German government had been forced to increase production of anti-aircraft armament (and was already resource constrained), and assign many more men to work in AAA units, by '44, I'd posit that the strategic offensive *did* have a definite effect in terms of reducing the available manpower and equipment resources for their ground forces as well. Brooks and IIRC by the summer of 1944 they were already suffering the strategic campaign's attrition effects in terms of training of replacement pilots to take the place of those they had lost, a large part of which were lost defending against the 8th AF and RAF BC. Absolutely. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Greatest Strategic Air Missions? | Leadfoot | Military Aviation | 66 | September 19th 04 05:09 PM |
Greatest Strategic Air Missions | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 45 | August 31st 04 11:29 PM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 09:59 PM |