A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What's wrong with this idea?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 31st 03, 04:30 AM
Addison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:28:22 -0700, Ace Pilot wrote:

After reading the "Do you always file IFR" thread, I
began thinking about some of the benefits of IFR flight that some
mentioned. The two biggest being that you can cruise at altitudes that
decrease your chances of colliding with a VFR aircraft and
you're guaranteed flight following.


The point of VFR conditions is that you should be able to avoid other
aircraft. Also, as my IFR ground school instructor insisted almost every
session... IFR doesn't mean that you're separated from VFR traffic.

You're also not guaranteed "flight following".

http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183139-1.html
http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182649-1.html

Check those out.

outweigh the downside of flying IFR (in your opinion), wouldn't
it make sense to always file and fly IFR, even if not legal to do so?


No.

If so, then that's what we'd do.

Specifically, I'm thinking that if you follow these 2 rules:

1. Fly under VMC conditions only (i.e., treat it just like a VFR
flight for visibility and cloud clearance).


2. If given a clearance you are unable to follow, inform ATC
"Unable"; and get another clearance, or, as a last resort,
cancel IFR.


Want to think about this a little bit more? So if you're in the IFR
system, and the controllers are expecting you to be IFR trained, tested,
and current - or at least HAVE been at some point, and when they issue you
a clearance - and you suddenly cancel...

So you'll (without all the training), in a plane that doesn't meet the
requirements (not _all_ regs are there just to give bureaucrats a job)
overload the system, then cause mass confusion? And that will be safer?

it would also be safer
to fly IFR than VFR, even if you aren't IFR current.


_If_ you're IFR rated, I might agree. But then, in that case, why not
just _get current_?

Addison
  #2  
Old July 31st 03, 04:07 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One other downside - what if everybody did it? [fly IFR irrespective of the
rating and equipment to attempt to avoid VFR midairs]

Jose

(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
ATC says wrong position Greg Esres Instrument Flight Rules 28 April 30th 04 05:37 PM
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? Stephen Harding Military Aviation 63 February 14th 04 07:38 PM
A Brilliant Idea nafod40 Home Built 4 September 9th 03 10:33 PM
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap tim liverance Military Aviation 0 August 18th 03 12:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.