![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:28:22 -0700, Ace Pilot wrote:
After reading the "Do you always file IFR" thread, I began thinking about some of the benefits of IFR flight that some mentioned. The two biggest being that you can cruise at altitudes that decrease your chances of colliding with a VFR aircraft and you're guaranteed flight following. The point of VFR conditions is that you should be able to avoid other aircraft. Also, as my IFR ground school instructor insisted almost every session... IFR doesn't mean that you're separated from VFR traffic. You're also not guaranteed "flight following". http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183139-1.html http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182649-1.html Check those out. outweigh the downside of flying IFR (in your opinion), wouldn't it make sense to always file and fly IFR, even if not legal to do so? No. If so, then that's what we'd do. Specifically, I'm thinking that if you follow these 2 rules: 1. Fly under VMC conditions only (i.e., treat it just like a VFR flight for visibility and cloud clearance). 2. If given a clearance you are unable to follow, inform ATC "Unable"; and get another clearance, or, as a last resort, cancel IFR. Want to think about this a little bit more? So if you're in the IFR system, and the controllers are expecting you to be IFR trained, tested, and current - or at least HAVE been at some point, and when they issue you a clearance - and you suddenly cancel... So you'll (without all the training), in a plane that doesn't meet the requirements (not _all_ regs are there just to give bureaucrats a job) overload the system, then cause mass confusion? And that will be safer? it would also be safer to fly IFR than VFR, even if you aren't IFR current. _If_ you're IFR rated, I might agree. But then, in that case, why not just _get current_? Addison |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One other downside - what if everybody did it? [fly IFR irrespective of the
rating and equipment to attempt to avoid VFR midairs] Jose (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
ATC says wrong position | Greg Esres | Instrument Flight Rules | 28 | April 30th 04 05:37 PM |
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 63 | February 14th 04 07:38 PM |
A Brilliant Idea | nafod40 | Home Built | 4 | September 9th 03 10:33 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |