A wacky idea

Jose ) wrote:

Seatbelts - confirm everyone has their seatbelt fastened

Does anyone ever take their seatbelt off in a small aircraft? My
preflight brief instructs the passengers to always leave their belt on.

Sometimes people do, for reasons that don't really matter.

Really, even after you've briefed them about not doing so?

--
Peter

Sometimes people do [remove their seatbelts], for reasons that don't really matter.

Really, even after you've briefed them about not doing so?

Really. It hasn't happened to me, so I'm actually speculating, but based on human nature I would not skip the "do you have your seatbelt fastened" check as a simple article of faith. Also things can get caught and the belt can unbuckle by itself.

Jose
--
Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Peter R." wrote:

Does anyone ever take their seatbelt off in a small aircraft? My
preflight brief instructs the passengers to always leave their belt on.

I don't usually take mine off. Some of my back seat passengers have done so in
flight. It allows them to change sides if the better view is on the other side of the
plane. I occasionally have done so if I were alone and needed to reach something in
the back seat. When Elisabeth is with me, she may do so for the same reason. I just
make sure everyone has them fastened before we land.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ...

I don't usually take mine off. Some of my back seat passengers have done so in
flight. It allows them to change sides if the better view is on the other side of the
plane. I occasionally have done so if I were alone and needed to reach something in
the back seat. When Elisabeth is with me, she may do so for the same reason. I just
make sure everyone has them fastened before we land.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.

Hi George!

I read somewhere, maybe Flight Training Mag., about a guy flying a
Pantheon and his seat belt had some slack. He was knocked out cold
when his head hit the ceiling, the plain hit turbulence. He woke up
close to terrain after over an hour of unconciousness. It was one of
those I learned from it articles.

I have been in some bad turbulence. I always keep my belt tight. But
then again, I only can afford to rent for two to three hours at the
most. I don't have my own plane. Two to three hours of tight seat
belt is tolerable. For those that are lucky enough to have their own
planes, I guess you fly so much that the seat belt would become a
bother.

Bryan

G.R. Patterson III ) wrote:

I don't usually take mine off. Some of my back seat passengers have done so in
flight. It allows them to change sides if the better view is on the other side of the
plane. I occasionally have done so if I were alone and needed to reach something in
the back seat. When Elisabeth is with me, she may do so for the same reason. I just
make sure everyone has them fastened before we land.

Right or wrong, years of driving in a state that was one of the first to
impose a seatbelt law have made me look to seatbelt use as second
nature, and the lack of their use as completely unnatural.

When I first started flying in a C172, I dumped the GUMPs check since
three (or even four, counting the seatbelt check) of the checks were not
applicable to that aircraft. Since flying a retractable-gear Bonanza,
though, I have reincorporated its use several times when in range.

As a two-year instrument rated pilot who strives to minimize the work
load on approach, I think of the seat-belt check as something belonging
in the in-range check, normally done well before the GUMPS check.

Furthermore, the chances of encountering head-bumping turbulence are
higher from the moment the descent out of the cruise altitude begins, at
least in a small aircraft, so a seatbelt check with the instruction to
leave them on seems more practical at that point, rather than in the
pattern during the GUMPS check.

But, I am just commenting on this check, not trying to change the world.

--
Peter

Dave wrote:
Ramapriya wrote:

Is it not possible to have buttons inside the cockpit that perform
a set of checklist actions that pilots normally do ...

I always walk around and check the tires, oil, battery connections,
and etc before a long trip. And that's just my automobile, which I
ensure always stays at 0.0 AGL with no roll, pitch nor yaw.

Where on earth do you live that allows you to go anywhere useful
with "no roll, pitch nor yaw"?

That said, I recall an old advert for a Citroen with one of those
weirdo suspensions, which showed two views of the car on a corner.

In one picture, the car was said to be stationary; in the other,
it was reputed to be taking the corner at something like 60 mph.

The text invited readers to try to figure out which was which.

There was no discernible roll in either picture, and the shutter
speed was fast enough for there to be no discernible blurring of
the tyres' tread patterns.

Eventually, I *did* find a tell-tale feature.

If you want to ttry to work it out, don't scroll down just yet ...














































While that suspension could keep the car's body pretty level, it
couldn't prevent the tip of the roof-mounted aerial from giving
the game away by bending towards the outside of the turn ...