![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the outlanding on water is far more common...
Good point. Getting back to the Wurtsboro Salto accident, the pilot might indeed have tried landing in a lake if the option occurred to him (there was probably a lake within reach). In the late 1980's an HP-14 landed safely and without damage in one of them. If you have to land in the water, put the landing gear down to keep the nose from plowing too deeply and too steeply under the water. Mike Yankee (Address is munged to thwart spammers. To reply, delete everything after "com".) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:14:38 +0000, MikeYankee wrote:
If you have to land in the water, put the landing gear down to keep the nose from plowing too deeply and too steeply under the water. Does anybody know if the Ventus pilot in the recent incident ( http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...15X01341&key=1 ) landed wheel up or down? Thanks Ian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Forbes" wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:14:38 +0000, MikeYankee wrote: If you have to land in the water, put the landing gear down to keep the nose from plowing too deeply and too steeply under the water. Does anybody know if the Ventus pilot in the recent incident ( http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...15X01341&key=1 ) landed wheel up or down? Thanks Ian Heard it was wheel down. From the damage, would appear not to have been minimum energy. Gross reservoir is 7950MSL though. If downwind (conventional wisdom), touch down would have been pretty fast. Frank Whiteley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F.L. Whiteley wrote:
"Ian Forbes" wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:14:38 +0000, MikeYankee wrote: If you have to land in the water, put the landing gear down to keep the nose from plowing too deeply and too steeply under the water. Does anybody know if the Ventus pilot in the recent incident ( http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...15X01341&key=1 ) landed wheel up or down? Thanks Ian Heard it was wheel down. From the damage, would appear not to have been minimum energy. Gross reservoir is 7950MSL though. If downwind (conventional wisdom), touch down would have been pretty fast. Frank Whiteley Wheel down, according to my second hand source (whom I believe was part of the crew that picked up/fished out the pieces). Also, I was told the tail touched first, causing the nose to hit hard enough to submerge, resulting in the flip. Again second hand. Shawn |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
max altitude and Mach 1 | Boomer | Military Aviation | 22 | June 1st 04 08:04 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
Lower Drag: Rounded or Sharp? | Jay | Home Built | 9 | May 10th 04 10:30 PM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
Forward CG Experience | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 41 | November 19th 03 02:54 PM |