![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think we are missing the point on what Ken was asking about. The
issue is not about paying propert tax in the county where aircraft is based. The issue is about counties sending fishing expedition letters based on the data from the FAA database alone, having no proof whatsoever that glider is actually stored in the county. Now imagine if you would receive letter from the county stating that they think you violated speed limit on their roads and unless you can prove that you haven't been in their county for the past 5 years you owe them fee for the traffic violation ! That would be ridiculous, but so is this! Why do I have to spend my time and money to defend myself when I did nothing wrong ? I have no problem with counties sending notifications that would let me know that if the glider is stored in the county I owe tax. However, I think counties should be required by law to provide significant proof that aircraft is stored in the county before threathening with penalties for not suppying them with information. Having said that, when I received a letter from LA county demanding to supply them with information about the aircraft, I did what people suggested here to do - called them up, let them know aircraft is not in LA county , then send them a mail with an invoice for the arcraft purchase and letter stating where aircraft resides. Haven't heard from them since and still waiting to hear from the county where the aircraft is stored. Limus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Limus" wrote: I think we are missing the point on what Ken was asking about. The issue is not about paying propert tax in the county where aircraft is based. The issue is about counties sending fishing expedition letters based on the data from the FAA database alone, having no proof whatsoever that glider is actually stored in the county. Now imagine if you would receive letter from the county stating that they think you violated speed limit on their roads and unless you can prove that you haven't been in their county for the past 5 years you owe them fee for the traffic violation ! That would be ridiculous, but so is this! Why do I have to spend my time and money to defend myself when I did nothing wrong ? I have no problem with counties sending notifications that would let me know that if the glider is stored in the county I owe tax. However, I think counties should be required by law to provide significant proof that aircraft is stored in the county before threathening with penalties for not suppying them with information. Having said that, when I received a letter from LA county demanding to supply them with information about the aircraft, I did what people suggested here to do - called them up, let them know aircraft is not in LA county , then send them a mail with an invoice for the arcraft purchase and letter stating where aircraft resides. Haven't heard from them since and still waiting to hear from the county where the aircraft is stored. Limus Yes, this is my point. Fair is fair, and I'll pay my fair share to the County where my glider is based. I still have *some* Kansas conservative principles remaining. What I feel is wrong is that Kern County is demanding that I supply information about my glider's whereabouts and value, with no evidence offered that it's ever been there, and threatening penalties for non-compliance. If this is considered acceptable behavior, imagine getting such a notice from every single County in a two state area! It might be more lucrative than spamming for V|@gr@... When the City of Cincinnati sent me a $50 invoice for transient aircraft usage of their facility, they let me know the day and hour my tail number was recorded. With the help of AOPA we found a Twin based in Dayton whose N-number could have been mistaken for mine, if you swapped a B for a 8. I wrote them a polite note and never heard back. My fallback plan was to get them to sign a landing form so I could claim a straight-distance record from MEV, but since the landing was at 10pm on 12/25 it probably would have been denied. ;-) Ken |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I also got a prop tax "fishing" bill from Kern County last year, probably because my glider was assembled and tied down outside on the day the assessor happened to visit that airport. The letter came to the address in the FAA database connected to my N number. I filled out their form and sent it back with the info that the glider was based in another county. 9 months later I have yet to recieve any further correspondence. Bureaucracy can sometimes work in your favor. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Apr 2005 20:15:51 -0700, "OscarDelta" wrote:
I also got a prop tax "fishing" bill from Kern County last year, probably because my glider was assembled and tied down outside on the day the assessor happened to visit that airport. The letter came to the address in the FAA database connected to my N number. I filled out their form and sent it back with the info that the glider was based in another county. 9 months later I have yet to recieve any further correspondence. Bureaucracy can sometimes work in your favor. Might be amusing to display bogus N-numbers on everyone's trailer... rj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Jones wrote:
On 6 Apr 2005 20:15:51 -0700, "OscarDelta" wrote: I also got a prop tax "fishing" bill from Kern County last year, probably because my glider was assembled and tied down outside on the day the assessor happened to visit that airport. The letter came to the address in the FAA database connected to my N number. I filled out their form and sent it back with the info that the glider was based in another county. 9 months later I have yet to recieve any further correspondence. Bureaucracy can sometimes work in your favor. Might be amusing to display bogus N-numbers on everyone's trailer... rj hahaha Let's see, I think I'll paint Gary's on one side and Jerry's on the other! Good on ya Ralph. Frank Whiteley |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
Bad publicity | David Starer | Soaring | 18 | March 8th 04 03:57 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
I wish I'd never got into this... | Kevin Neave | Soaring | 32 | September 19th 03 12:18 PM |
Restricting Glider Ops at Public Arpt. | rjciii | Soaring | 36 | August 25th 03 04:50 PM |