![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Jose, Any opinions on Usenet about this? Uhm, in what cave have you been hiding? ;-) You are right. Except for running at 50 ROP, which is a bad spot. Read Deakin's columns on engine management at www.avweb.com. And learn to use Google to search Usenet. When I did a biennial at Bishop, CA, the pre take-off procedure in the club 152 was to lean the mixture for max revs at max throttle. The difference to full rich was so marked that I am confident we would never have got airborne, even off their long runway, at full rich. My experience with a syndicate Robin 140 here in UK was that a climb at full power started to go lumpy like a car on full choke above 4000 feet. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
If you read the POH and look at the power setting charts, it says something along the lines of "with lean mixture". Lean anytime you are in level flight, otherwise you cannot get the fuel burn numbers in the POH. That includes if you are 500 feet MSL or 15,000 feet MSL. At power settings above 65% lean to about 75 to 100 degrees F rich of peak (50 degrees ROP is about the worst possible mixture setting - see John Deakin's engine operation articles on AVweb www.avweb.com). At 65% power or less, you can lean any way you want, you cannot generate enough heat or pressure to damage the engine through detonation. You are not running a fuel injected engine, so you may or may not be able to operate lean of peak without it running rough, although you can try it without hurting anything. Sometimes running carb heat will stir things up enough that you can run smoothly LOP. The stuff in the POH about leaning below 5,000 or 3,000 or whatever, has to do with leaning in the climb. It has lead to the aviation falsehood that one should not lean in cruise below some magic altitude. With avgas at $5 a gallon, it's utterly foolish not to lean in cruise flight. All the best, Rick Jose wrote: There was a discussion in my club about leaning the engine (of our cherokees) below 5000 feet in cruise. This was prompted by the observation in the manual that the engine should be leaned above 5000 feet at all times in cruise, and below 5000 feet at the pilot's discrescion. So, how should the pilot discrede? The old timers seemed to agree that: 1: at low power (say 65% or less) you can't hurt the engine by leaning to peak EGT, but... 2: at high power (above that, including the 75% many like to fly at to go fast) one should only lean if it's cold enough, and that the best thing to do is run full rich if you're in doubt. This runs counter to my understanding and practice. I lean (50 degrees ROP) in cruise at all altitudes, including the ones where I can pick the leaves off the trees, and I run 70-75% power. Running full rich is just dumping a third of the fuel out the tailpipe. Any opinions on Usenet about this? Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaning for taxi | Jim Rosinski | Piloting | 28 | September 12th 04 03:53 AM |
[FS] LX 5000 | Denis | Soaring | 0 | May 27th 04 10:28 PM |
Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward | Steven P. McNicoll | Military Aviation | 8 | March 9th 04 06:15 AM |
Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward | Steven P. McNicoll | Owning | 0 | March 8th 04 08:39 PM |
O-320 leaning | Roger Long | Piloting | 5 | November 8th 03 11:40 PM |