A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 21st 06, 01:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory


As airplane travel is becoming more frequent, air traffic is said to
double in the next coming years.


Right.

http://www.birdseyetourist.com/?cat=14


  #2  
Old March 21st 06, 02:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

Pilots, prepare to lose some sovereignty over your flights:

http://www.exn.ca/dailyplanet/view.asp?date=2/13/2006
As airplane travel is becoming more frequent, air traffic is said to
double in the next coming years. A new system called 4DT (4 Dimension
Trajectory) will soon replace current ones.


relax. The concept of required time of arrival has been talked about
for years. It's going to be a loooooonnnnnngggggggg time before
it's actually implemented.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #3  
Old March 21st 06, 03:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:21:43 -0500, Bob Noel
wrote in
::

The concept of required time of arrival has been talked about
for years.


Apparently, among other things, 4DT supports tweaking that time en
route so there will be less holding, and stepped approach descents
will give way to throttled back glides.

It's going to be a loooooonnnnnngggggggg time before
it's actually implemented.


Perhaps. But IIRC Bowing is providing ATC under contract in the UK.
Once the software is written and tested, it would be possible to
deploy it as rapidly as personnel could be trained. In this country,
of course, there's no need to reduce CO2 emissions and aircraft noise
levels. :-(
  #4  
Old March 21st 06, 05:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

It's going to be a loooooonnnnnngggggggg time before
it's actually implemented.


Perhaps. But IIRC Bowing is providing ATC under contract in the UK.
Once the software is written and tested, it would be possible to
deploy it as rapidly as personnel could be trained. In this country,
of course, there's no need to reduce CO2 emissions and aircraft noise
levels. :-(


Check out the history of when all the new CNS/ATM requirements were
going to implemented. They always always always slide to the right,
and slide to the right many times. You think this particular old idea is
any different?

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #5  
Old March 21st 06, 07:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:34:17 -0500, Bob Noel
wrote in
::

They always always always slide to the right,
and slide to the right many times. You think this particular old idea is
any different?


Was Boeing doing the sliding?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
Boeing officials say that by May they will give the FAA a
comprehensive plan for replacing the nation's radar-based air
traffic control system -- which is straining to handle the 93,000
aircraft that fly daily in U.S. airspace -- with a satellite-based
one that could squeeze perhaps 50 percent more flights into
available airspace and improve air safety.
  #6  
Old March 21st 06, 12:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

They always always always slide to the right,
and slide to the right many times. You think this particular old idea is
any different?


Was Boeing doing the sliding?


Yes.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #7  
Old March 21st 06, 03:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:21:43 -0500, Bob Noel
wrote in
::

The concept of required time of arrival has been talked about
for years.


Apparently, among other things, 4DT supports tweaking that time en
route so there will be less holding, and stepped approach descents
will give way to throttled back glides.

It's going to be a loooooonnnnnngggggggg time before
it's actually implemented.


Perhaps. But IIRC Bowing is providing ATC under contract in the UK.


I don't think so. Bowing are not providing ATC under contact in the UK. ATC
is provided by NATS http://www.nats.co.uk/about/ownership.html


  #8  
Old March 21st 06, 06:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The New ATC: 4 Dimension Trajectory

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:34:44 -0000, "Chris"
wrote in ::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:21:43 -0500, Bob Noel
wrote in
::

The concept of required time of arrival has been talked about
for years.


Apparently, among other things, 4DT supports tweaking that time en
route so there will be less holding, and stepped approach descents
will give way to throttled back glides.

It's going to be a loooooonnnnnngggggggg time before
it's actually implemented.


Perhaps. But IIRC Bowing is providing ATC under contract in the UK.


I don't think so. Bowing are not providing ATC under contact in the UK. ATC
is provided by NATS http://www.nats.co.uk/about/ownership.html


Interesting:

NATS is a public private partnership between the Airline Group, a
consortium of seven UK airlines, which holds 42%, NATS staff who
hold 5%, UK airport operator BAA plc, with 4%, and the government
which holds 49% and a golden share.

The Airline Group is a consortium of seven UK airlines: British
Airways, bmi British Midland, Virgin Atlantic, Britannia, Monarch,
easyJet and Airtours.


I do recall, that there was discussion several years ago of the UK
contracting with Boeing for ATC services, but I can't locate a
reference just now.

Here's some more interesting information about NATS:

http://www.rppi.org/atc15.html#Anchor-42816
August 2003
As reported here previously, NATS accomplished a financial
restructuring last spring that brought in BAA as a new investor
and led to new cash infusions by both BAA and NATS's 49% owner,
the U.K. government. Now NATS is about to launch a billion-dollar
bond issue to refinance a large part of its bank debt. That, in
turn, will permit the removal of restrictive provisions on the
debt that had prevented NATS from moving forward with its $1.6
billion, 10-year modernization program. The bond issue has
received AAA ratings by both Standard & Poor's and Moody's.

Apparently it was the FAA (not Boeing) who delayed implementation of
something similar to 4DT in the US:

http://www.reason.org/atcreform15.shtml
Jaws dropped last month when the FAA announced that
controller-pilot-data-link communications (CPDLC) was being put on
indefinite hold, despite a highly successful test program in
Miami. Automating routine ATC communications-in effect, switching
from voice to email-"is the key architectural enabler of almost
any future envisioned air traffic management system," says Kevin
Brown, one of Boeing's senior ATC people. "It is hard to imagine a
future where the connective tissue between aircraft and ground is
someone's voice over a VHF radio." And CPDLC isn't just about
automating a few routine voice messages. It could eventually
permit a plane's flight management system to automatically update
ATC computers with the plane's current trajectory, making possible
a "network-centric" approach to ATC.

By putting the program on hold, the FAA is ceding leadership in
CPDLC to Europe. Eurocontrol's plan will equip 15 en-route centers
by 2007, whereas observers now don't expect comparable nationwide
CPDLC equipage here until 2012, at the earliest.


More information he


http://commdocs.house.gov/committees...hsy73841_0.HTM
DEVELOPING THE NEXT GENERATION AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS
COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
JULY 19, 2001
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1-26 Dimension Needed Mark Zivley Soaring 3 February 7th 05 02:16 PM
Dell Dimension 8300 Tlewis95 Simulators 3 March 4th 04 07:50 PM
RV-8 Dimension request Howard Johnson Home Built 3 December 7th 03 07:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.