![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Stutzman wrote: Thomas Borchert wrote: Garmin 330 if you want/need Mode S, otherwise the 327 is great. Didn't I hear that TIS (traffic information service, or something like that) is not going to be developed any further? If thats the case, what is the value (to the pilot) of Mode S to your average part 91 flyer? Mode S will be required in the not too distant future as ADS-B gets rolled out. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: Didn't I hear that TIS (traffic information service, or something like that) is not going to be developed any further? If thats the case, what is the value (to the pilot) of Mode S to your average part 91 flyer? Mode S will be required in the not too distant future as ADS-B gets rolled out. I doubt it. Seriously. There really isn't a case for Mode S. It's been a solution in search of a problem for years and years and years. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Garmin 330 and it is a wonderful box. It does have some nice
features like a flight timer, readout of pressure altitude, as well as an aural alert when leaving an altitude. However, the most useful item is the Mode S, connected to a box that will display traffic. Even on severe clear days it is amazing how much traffic is out there that you will not see. Most of my travels in the Midwest have had coverage (Chicago, Milwaukee, Indiana, Minneapolis), while some smaller locations did not (South Bend, for example). Regardless, for the extra few relative dollars over a regular transponder, it was definitely worth the cost. It sure beats $20,000 for true TCAS or TCAD. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Hey all... just got official confirmation that my KT76's power output is way low.... classic sign of weak/dying/dead cavity tube. Just looking for suggestions on what might be a good, cost-effective replacement. I'm tired of futzing with transponders so I'm pretty sure I want a solid-state replacement. Hey, Cory - Just an FYI as I am NOT a salesman, but I have a perfectly working KT76A that I pulled out of my Bonanza when I installed a Garmin GTX330. I had been meaning to put it on eBay, but procrastination sank in and six months later, I still haven't done so. If you are interested in it, drop me a note at pjricc @ gmailX.com (remove the x) and I can send you any information you might need. -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll admit to some lack of knowledge here but, other than the Mode S
ability of the Garmin 330, aren't xpdrs pretty much just a one trick pony? I.e., they just receive a radar signal and reply. Why would a Garmin 327 be any better than any other? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "skym" wrote in message ups.com... I'll admit to some lack of knowledge here but, other than the Mode S ability of the Garmin 330, aren't xpdrs pretty much just a one trick pony? I.e., they just receive a radar signal and reply. Why would a Garmin 327 be any better than any other? No cavity tube for one. Push button entry, VFR button, solid state electronics... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good points, but do they even make them with cavity tubes or without
solid state electronics anymore? Also, at what price to push "VFR" vs push/dial in 1200? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "skym" wrote in message ups.com... Good points, but do they even make them with cavity tubes or without solid state electronics anymore? Don't know...but that's a point when considering it as a replacement BEFORE the old unit fails. Also, at what price to push "VFR" vs push/dial in 1200? By itself, nothing. It's ironic, though, how such a simple, cheap to implement feature gets left out on other products. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() skym wrote: Good points, but do they even make them with cavity tubes or without solid state electronics anymore? Yes, they still make them with cavity tubes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
"skym" wrote in message ups.com... I'll admit to some lack of knowledge here but, other than the Mode S ability of the Garmin 330, aren't xpdrs pretty much just a one trick pony? I.e., they just receive a radar signal and reply. Why would a Garmin 327 be any better than any other? No cavity tube for one. Push button entry, VFR button, solid state electronics... Narco AT155 and AT165 are also solid state and have the push to squawk VFR feature, as well as some timers. IIRC, the cost is quite a bit less than the Garmin, and you can put it in your old tray. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replacement DG & AI: Suggestions? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 11 | April 20th 05 05:09 PM |
Operation without a transponder | flyer | Piloting | 11 | September 14th 04 08:48 AM |
Paperwork for transponder replacement. | Rutger | Owning | 2 | August 12th 04 04:15 AM |
Transponder test after static system opened? | Jack I | Owning | 6 | March 14th 04 03:09 PM |
More on transponder petition | Ian Cant | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:37 PM |