![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 8, 9:25*am, Peter Clark
wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:40:33 -0800 (PST), "F. Baum" wrote: . If there truly was a physical reason why spoilers should not come out in the air, it would have been an engineering requirement to systematically disable their mechanism unless, say, the gear is down and the wheels rolling. Actually, this is the way it works. Only some of the spoilers deploy inflight (Either through the spoiler handle or the Aileron/Spoiler mixer ). The rest of the spoilers will not deploy until the plane is on the ground. Or an airspeed lockout. *If memory serves they won't deploy, even for roll assistance, above a certain speed either. Not too sure on this. On all the jets I have experience with, the boards are usable to VMO/MMO. On some some of the older ones, like the 727 they will blow down a bit as you approach the pole. *Don't they also deflect at different angles depending on what system is activating them? *Highest angle off the wing is for full in-flight spoiler handle (and some don't even come up for that), inboard segments deflect at a greater angle than outboards for roll assistance (which is about 1/2 the angle off the wing compared to full spoiler), and everything comes up at full for weight-on-wheels spoiler system? They deploy proportionate to the roll or spoiler input. On several of the newer airliners there is a flight detent and full range for ground deployment. Exceeding the flight detent results in buffeting. As an interesting side note, on the Boeings, if you have the boards about half way extended and then try a turn, you get a dramatic increase in the roll rate. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amine wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:35 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Go around. Well, let's play the devil's advocate... What if you can't go around? (E.g. because of engine failure or in a glider). I mean, I understand why you don't want to deploy spoilers if you're below minimums or if you're flirting with stall speed. But if you're well above minimums, with no risk of stalling, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't use spoilers to bleed the extra momentum/altitude. The only disadvantage would be that the final approach will be steeper and thereby would not have the elegance of the perfect glide slope. But that's seems to be more a matter of taste (and possibly performance) than an actual safety issue. After all, the "no-spoiler-in-midair"dogma isn't built in the design of the pilot interface. If there truly was a physical reason why spoilers should not come out in the air, it would have been an engineering requirement to systematically disable their mechanism unless, say, the gear is down and the wheels rolling. The "go around" comment was meant as a general rule for any approach situation that has the aircraft too high and fast for the runway. Naturally, any approach situation ending with an accident assumes something went wrong somewhere. In the case of spoiler use, I can't speak directly to the DC8 scenario as I'm not DC8 type rated, but obviously in this case, a spoiler deployment scenario that had the POTENTIAL for problems had been noted prior by the Captain (at least this is my understanding anyway). In such a situation, with the first officer making the approach, the scenario for an in-flight deployment error on the spoilers having been noted, it would seem obvious to me that a go around call rather than ANY attempt to use spoilers to save the approach would have been the prudent call by the first officer. I'm sure there is more to the story. There always is. :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 7, 1:20*am, Amine wrote:
How come the first officer (with over 5500 hrs with that type of aircraft) made such a decision to deploy spoilers while still in the air? What else, when full flaps and idle power aren't enough, can a pilot use to handle a too high/too fast final approach if not deploy spoilers? Dudley got this one right (Go Around), but it is kinda a loaded question because you cannot use flight spoilers or airbrakes beyond certain flap settings . So if you had landing flaps, spoilers are not an option. In the older jets you would get a warning horn if you had any flaps deployed. The best thing to do when you are to high is to get into the landing configuration early because this will cut the ground speed and give you the best decent rate over a given distance. As a side question, what is the functional difference between spoilers and airbrakes? Nothing. The current Boeing manuals make a distinction between airbrakes and ground spoilers because not all of them deploy in flight. Some only deploy on the ground during landing rollout or RTO. As a side note the flight spoilers augument roll control when you pass 10 degrees of aileron deflection (This makes Xwind takeoffs interesting). Hope this helps, FB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 7, 8:40*am, "F. Baum" wrote:
As a side question, what is the functional difference between spoilers and airbrakes? Nothing. The current Boeing manuals make a distinction between airbrakes and ground spoilers because not all of them deploy in flight. Oops, should have said Flight spoilers and ground spoilers. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| spoilers vs. ailerons | [email protected] | Piloting | 36 | August 8th 05 12:24 PM |
| Frozen spoilers | stephanevdv | Soaring | 0 | November 4th 04 06:24 PM |
| Open Spoilers Alarm on tow | tango4 | Soaring | 12 | March 17th 04 07:18 PM |
| Spoilers on Laister Nugget? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 1 | January 28th 04 01:47 AM |
| L-13 Spoilers | Scott | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 03 07:08 AM |