![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 10:17*am, wrote:
On Jan 21, 10:20*pm, Pat Russell wrote: In the IGC rules, the factor applied to your speed or distance is the ratio of your handicap to the handicap of the best glider at the contest. *In the US Sports Class, the factor is the handicap itself. Pat, When you say "best" glider at the contest , do you mean the glider that wins the day/contest, or the glider entry having the most weighty handicap (newer glider having the best performance capability)? The IGC handicaps are used in an inverse way to the US handicaps, i.e. the higher the handicap, the faster the plane. The time around course is multiplied by the handicap before determining speed, rather than the distance. The handicaps are all "normalized" so that the slowest plane gets no modification. E.g., if everyone show up in an LS3, Mini-Nimbus, Mosquito, or ASW-24 (all with the same 1.07 handicap) then everyone is scored directly on speed around course (no modifications for handicap). If one more person shows up with a standard Libelle (with a handicap of 0.98) then the Libelle gets scored with straight speed and everyone else gets their time on course increased by 1.07/0.98 = 9.18%. I could be wrong about the exact details, since Strepla (which is used by scoring in other countries) is not open source, unlike WinScore. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 7:44*am, PMSC Member wrote:
If we had Sports class only pilots voting on this subject the results would probably be different. I would like to see this vote taken. Let's have a contest and we will see how many pilots will show up. I doubt if the entry list of a single contest would persuade anyone either way. Hey, the entry list makes a big difference to me. There's a bunch of people in the racing community I look forward to seeing every year. Maybe I'm not that competitive (well, OK, I'd like to beat the snot out of W8. Just kidding Ray :-), but I think my flying gets better when I get to hang out in a contest with really good pilots. Plus, I've made some really good friends at my few contests. On the other hand, flying in a club class contest would be really attractive to me and a lot of other pilots out there. As it is the US sports class is further away from the WGC equivalent than other US classes. I think the US would benefit from exposing more of its pilots to what they'll see in the WGC. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 1:00*am, Howard Banks
wrote: To change this a bit, has anybody else noticed that the results of the poll of pilots by the contest committee on this subject were heavily against changing the sports class and introducing a club class variant? * Does this committee -- or the rules part of it -- take no notice of the results of these polls, or what? At 03:20 22 January 2009, Pat Russell wrote: In the IGC rules, the factor applied to your speed or distance is the ratio of your handicap to the handicap of the best glider at the contest. *In the US Sports Class, the factor is the handicap itself. The difference causes the boundary between points for finishers and non-finishers to be shifted. *The amount of shift depends on which gliders show up for the contest *(in the IGC case). -Pat- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The RC did pay attention to the poll. I also listened to a small, but very vocal and dedicated group led by 5U that think we should give Club a chance to be tried and see what develops. There are some real concerns aboutr how this might affect Sports. See the RC meeting minutes for a view of those. That said, the RC determined that it is worthwhile to give this a try, by waiver, and see how it goes. If we see a bunch of new blood, as some claim we will, it could be good. If all it does is cut the heart out of Sports, that will be not good- obviously. It will not be likely to become a full blown class withouit substantial contributions to participation. We will watch and see how it goes, then poll and determine next steps. Please note that the RC does listen to the poll, but it is not the only input. Let's give it a chance. FWIW - UH will be flying a Club Class glider in Elmira. Call me a skeptical supporter. UH RC Chair |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to admit initially I didn't see any real advantage to the Club
class but I think I am starting to come around to the idea. The thing I really like about it is the handicapped Assigned task, which doesn't happen in Sports Class. I really like Assigned Tasks and as a result have almost exclusively flown in the 15 meter class even though I fly a 30+ year old glider. As pointed out in another thread I have noticed the significant drop in assigned tasks even in the 15 meter class and would like to see this task used more. Brian Case HP16T |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Club class/Sports class | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 7 | September 28th 08 12:17 AM |
Club Class vs. Sports Class | noel.wade | Soaring | 28 | September 25th 08 02:52 AM |
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS | 5 ugly | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 06 11:14 PM |
Does USA need a Club Class? | MC | Soaring | 42 | April 7th 05 08:07 PM |
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 03 10:07 PM |