![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The BGA rules say that your medical practitioner must sign the relevant
form which can be downloaded from the BGA website, nowhere does it say that your medical practitioner has to be in the UK so get the form signed by your doctor in the US and that complies with the rules. Yep, I had no problems flying solo in the UK with the form signed by an Irish GP. Bart |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:45*am, Paul Jessop wrote: You're clearly eligible for one (as you have an ICAO compliant glider licence/license/certificate and I assume you have 5h PIC in the last year ) There may be a small catch here. It is my understanding that most US pilot certificates are not ICAO compliant since they do not include the statement that the pilot is proficient in English. New certificates include the endorsement. Ahem - that appears to be wrong - here's what an ICAO FAQ says: "Glider and free balloon pilots and flight engineers: There is no language proficiency Standard applicable to these categories of personnel. However, Annex 1, Chapter 1, paragraph 1.2.9.3 contains a Recommendation that reads: "Flight engineers, glider and free balloon pilots should have the ability to speak and understand the language used for radiotelephony communications." From: http://www.icao.int/icao/en/trivia/peltrgFAQ.htm "Should" isn't "must" unless the state wishes to make it so. "Background: Effective March 5, 2008, ICAO Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing) standards require that all private, commercial or ATPs as well as FEs and flight navigators operating internationally as required crewmembers of an airplane or helicopter have an airman certificate with an endorsement of language proficiency. In the case of persons holding a U.S. airman certificate, the language proficiency endorsement will state “English Proficient” As noted in the FAQ I quoted from, the above quoted paragraph isn't applicable to glider pilots (note it only mentions airplane and helicopter pilots - so English language proficiency for pilots of gliders, balloons, airships, powered lift, ornithopters, and anti-gravity UFOs from Mars doesn't appear to be applicable.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article Andy writes:
On Jul 8, 11:45=A0am, Paul Jessop wrote: You're clearly eligible for one (as you have an ICAO compliant glider licence/license/certificate and I assume you have 5h PIC in the last year= ) There may be a small catch here. It is my understanding that most US pilot certificates are not ICAO compliant since they do not include the statement that the pilot is proficient in English. New certificates include the endorsement. "Background: Effective March 5, 2008, ICAO Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing) standards require that all private, commercial or ATPs as well as FEs and flight navigators operating internationally as required crewmembers of an airplane or helicopter have an airman certificate with an endorsement of language proficiency. In the case of persons holding a U.S. airman certificate, the language proficiency endorsement will state =93English Proficient=94 So Papa3 you may need to get a new FAA certificate before you try to use it as a basis for getting a BGA certificate. ![]() Andy Probably not. From http://www.luchtzak.be/forums/viewto...p?f=14&t=38606 Effective March 5, 2008, ICAO Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing) standards require that all private, commercial or ATPs as well as FEs and flight navigators operating internationally as required crewmembers of an airplane or helicopter have an airman certificate with an endorsement of language proficiency. In the case of persons holding a U.S. airman certificate, the language proficiency endorsement will state ?English Proficient?. On October 26, 2007, ICAO published State Letter AN 12/44.6-07/68 regarding Assembly - Resolution A36-11- Proficiency in the English Language Used for Radiotelephony, which automatically delays implementation up until March 5, 2011 for those countries notifying ICAO. As such, the U.S. has notified ICAO that it file a difference that will extend the U.S. compliance date until March 5, 2009 in order to provide sufficient time for all affected U.S. airman certificate holder to comply with the ICAO Language Proficiency airman certificate endorsement requirements. Since we are talking about gliders, not airplanes or helicopters, the requirement would appear not to apply. Further, since notification has been made to the ICAO, you would have until March 5, 2009 for international operations in airplanes and helicopters. If the operation were fully within the UK, in a UK registered aircraft, it would seem to not be an international operation, so the requirement probably would not apply there, anyway. Alan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 8:23*pm, (Alan) wrote:
In article Andy writes: On Jul 8, 11:45=A0am, Paul Jessop wrote: You're clearly eligible for one (as you have an ICAO compliant glider licence/license/certificate and I assume you have 5h PIC in the last year= ) There may be a small catch here. *It is my understanding that most US pilot certificates are not ICAO compliant since they do not include the statement that the pilot is proficient in English. *New certificates include the endorsement. "Background: Effective March 5, 2008, ICAO Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing) standards require that all private, commercial or ATPs as well as FEs and flight navigators operating internationally as required crewmembers of an airplane or helicopter have an airman certificate with an endorsement of language proficiency. In the case of persons holding a U.S. airman certificate, the language proficiency endorsement will state =93English Proficient=94 So Papa3 you may need to get a new FAA certificate before you try to use it as a basis for getting a BGA certificate. ![]() Andy * Probably not. *From *http://www.luchtzak.be/forums/viewto...p?f=14&t=38606 * *Effective March 5, 2008, ICAO Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing) standards * *require that all private, commercial or ATPs as well as FEs and flight * *navigators operating internationally as required crewmembers of an airplane * *or helicopter have an airman certificate with an endorsement of language * *proficiency. *In the case of persons holding a U.S. *airman certificate, * *the language proficiency endorsement will state ?English Proficient?. * *On October 26, 2007, ICAO published State Letter AN 12/44.6-07/68 regarding * *Assembly - Resolution A36-11- Proficiency in the English Language Used for * *Radiotelephony, which automatically delays implementation up until March 5, * *2011 for those countries notifying ICAO. *As such, the U.S. *has notified * *ICAO that it file a difference that will extend the U.S. *compliance date * *until March 5, 2009 in order to provide sufficient time for all affected * *U.S. *airman certificate holder to comply with the ICAO Language * *Proficiency airman certificate endorsement requirements. * Since we are talking about gliders, not airplanes or helicopters, the requirement would appear not to apply. * Further, since notification has been made to the ICAO, you would have until March 5, 2009 for international operations in airplanes and helicopters. * If the operation were fully within the UK, in a UK registered aircraft, it would seem to not be an international operation, so the requirement probably would not apply there, anyway. * * * * Alan- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks to everyone for clarifying/amplifying/explicating. I'll go ahead and take it up with the club(s) where I intend to fly and see what they say. In the meantime, I'll get the UK medical certificate out of the way just as a an additional precaution. With regard to English...one of my newer certificates (I think my most recent flight instructor) states English proficient or some such, though my wife might beg to differ. P3 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All U.S. Glider and Power Licenses must have the statement that the person is proficient in English. They are no longer issued without those words. Neita Montague CFIG
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, this thread IS 8 years old now, lots can change in that time.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Erik
Chris has outlined the issues very well. The biggest problem is the medical. Whilst there is no legal requirement for a medical to fly gliders in the UK, the BGA in its wisdom have laid down medical conditions that revolve around the pilots own GP (a PPL medical is accepted) Our insurers now accept these as conditions of flight insurance policies and have refused to pay out when pilots have let the medical lapse and had an accident. In the past, I have spoken to insurance agents about this and the advice was, "If you have US medicals then talk to the insurers of the club you intend to fly at and provide details of your medical, they may accept these and allow you to fly the clubs gliders." (Get confirmation is writing) We only have two or three under writers in the UK so it should not be a major problem and could save money/time/frustration in the long run. Regards Dave Martin. At 15:33 08 July 2009, Chris Reed wrote: Erik, We don't have a licensing system, thus your problem. We did invent something with the licence label, but it was just to satisfy (from memory) the French authorities. It's issued by the BGA, and doesn't meet the formal requirements of the various aviation treaties. Licensing will be introduced in the next few years, but no-one knows whether that will change the current system. You already know what that is, but for other potential visitors it's quite simple: a. Turn up at gliding club. b. Talk to instructor, show log book, possibly show gliding certificates, show copy of your medical (for UK pilots, this is just a general practitioner doctor's certification that you are fit to drive a small truck). c. Undertake whatever check flights the club requires (usually at least one launch if you want to fly the club's gliders). d. Go fly on your own. Your biggest complication might be the medical. If you have a US PPL, then your medical should be fine. I believe that for a US glider pilot licence you have general practitioner doctor's certification as well, so ideally someone at the BGA would be prepared to endorse this as equivalent to the UK certification. Papa3 wrote: Any of you folks from across the Pond care to help out? I'm finding myself spending more time in the UK lately, including weekends. I've flown with a number of different gliding clubs and thoroughly enjoyed myself... so much so that I'm looking in to what it would take to obtain a UK Gliding License. I contacted the BGA, but I was basically told to poke around the BGA Website to find the forms. Well, after 15 mintues of rooting around trying to figure out what applies and what doesn't in my situation, I've given up. Can anyone simplify this for me? Can I simply convert my US ratings (commercial glider with flight instructor, 2,000 hours, 1,000K diplome, etc.) to a UK license or do I need to start from scratch? Any help appreciated. Erik Mann (LS8-18 P3) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The basic requirement remains, to fly a glider solo in the UK you have to
be aged 16 years or more. That is the ONLY legal requirement, there are no others, no medical, no certificate, no licence, no talking to jobsworth. You just need to be 16 years or older. Without wishing to accuse you of being a jobsworth, Don, I think it's been 14 in the UK for a few years. Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 11:11:28 AM UTC+3, Paul Ruskin wrote:
The basic requirement remains, to fly a glider solo in the UK you have to be aged 16 years or more. That is the ONLY legal requirement, there are no others, no medical, no certificate, no licence, no talking to jobsworth. You just need to be 16 years or older. Without wishing to accuse you of being a jobsworth, Don, I think it's been 14 in the UK for a few years. Must have been quite a few. We had a discussion in NZ in the early 90s about whether we should keep the minimum age at 16, or change to 14 like USA and UK. In the end it was decided the entire concept of a minimum age based on calendar years was flawed and now we don't have one at all. If you can reach the controls and demonstrate to a club's chief instructor that you can fly the glider and (most importantly!) make appropriate decisions under pressure in various real and simulated situations -- congratulations, you can solo! To my knowledge, two 12 year olds have soloed in NZ (one boy, one girl). Maybe it's more by now. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
obtaining insurance quote .... | Ron Gleason | Soaring | 4 | January 17th 09 05:47 PM |
Owning before obtaining a PP license | New Pilot | Owning | 45 | November 5th 04 05:08 PM |
Should the USA have a soaring license, not a glider license? | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 04 07:16 PM |
Obtaining IFR clearances in Canada | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 22nd 04 03:47 PM |
Any ideas how much cost of ownership is on a Citation X on an annual basis ? | steve mew | Piloting | 1 | October 15th 03 06:00 PM |