![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Woooahhh...that test was done 35 years ago and yet the conclusion holds
true today! Therein lies/lays the problem in todays flying! What has happened to those skills? I can vividly recall my primary instructor reducing power and saying, "show me what ya got.." Then he said you can reduce it, but not increase it. Hae used that same scenario ever since. So many times that I ran into difficulties when I could not get more power and had to do with what I had. My whole thing is to fly the edges of the aircraft envelope at both ends of the spectrum. Generally though, the lower speeds are where most pilots run into problems and have the serious accidents.when they do the silly stall/spin thing. Silly because it should never happen. Serious of course when people get hurt or killed. Stupid when the pilot fails to get the proper training. arrggghhh Ol SOB |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ol SOB,
I agree with you completely. Until I got the Pitts, about 75% of my tailwheel time was within gliding distance of a field. I practice every conceiveable approach, takeoff, engine failure, landing, you name it. I liked to think I flew the airplane better at idle than I did at cruise and I certainly knew what it was going to be like (or as near as you can get) if the engine quit. I haven't carried any power in an approach in years, using only a trickle if I have to to recover a low approach angle. And that's how every airplane out to be flown regularly (on the edges of the envelope) to keep your skills sharp and so you'll know what to do if everything goes to a ball of chalk. In the vein, some of the most fun I've had flying has been the hours I've spent in a Cub or Tcraft under 300 feet and within the airfield fence. Fantastic!!! Shawn wrote in message oups.com... Woooahhh...that test was done 35 years ago and yet the conclusion holds true today! Therein lies/lays the problem in todays flying! What has happened to those skills? I can vividly recall my primary instructor reducing power and saying, "show me what ya got.." Then he said you can reduce it, but not increase it. Hae used that same scenario ever since. So many times that I ran into difficulties when I could not get more power and had to do with what I had. My whole thing is to fly the edges of the aircraft envelope at both ends of the spectrum. Generally though, the lower speeds are where most pilots run into problems and have the serious accidents.when they do the silly stall/spin thing. Silly because it should never happen. Serious of course when people get hurt or killed. Stupid when the pilot fails to get the proper training. arrggghhh Ol SOB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now that, to me, describes real stick and rudder skills and sounds like a
hell of a lot of fun. I can't wait to get back in the Tcraft and give it a go! Shawn wrote in message oups.com... Shawn, As folks have told you, the answer is yes for most tailwheel airplanes (not all, it's a question of elevator authority and c.g.). Interestingly, in about 1970 the Iowa State University flying team used an 85 hp. J-3 Cub as one of its competition airplanes in the national championships of the Intercollegiate flying competition in Bozeman, Montana. The rules at that time for the spot landing for tailwheel airplanes was to measure the point at which the mains touched. On approach, power could be reduced, but never reapplied. The Iowa State guys figured out the minimum power setting to roll the tailwheel, but keep the mains aloft in that Cub. They'd roll the tailwheel at some point short of the "line", keep the mains in the air until just about there, then close the throttle. They got so their accuracy was incredible. After the meet, the rules were changed. All the best, Rick ShawnD2112 wrote: Got a question for you taildragger old-timers. I've often thought about attitude and altitude control with power and elevator in various combinations and have wondered if it's possible to get a taildragger to literally drag it's tailwheel on the runway with the mains off, and do it intentionally, kind of like slowflight but REALLY low over the runway. I mean, we often try to land tailwheel first, so I was wondering if it's possible to set up to do it partially and prevent the mains from touching. I've tried in the Tcraft but can't seem to manage it. Anyone here ever done such a thing? Shawn |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tail flapper failure | Veeduber | Home Built | 2 | May 22nd 04 07:52 AM |
| Tail slat question | Guy Alcala | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 14th 04 09:56 AM |
| Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Owning | 1 | July 26th 03 12:34 PM |
| Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Piloting | 1 | July 26th 03 12:34 PM |
| The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 23rd 03 12:01 AM |