A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Taildragger tail dragging?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 05, 06:56 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Woooahhh...that test was done 35 years ago and yet the conclusion holds
true today!
Therein lies/lays the problem in todays flying! What has happened to
those skills?
I can vividly recall my primary instructor reducing power and saying,
"show me what ya got.." Then he said you can reduce it, but not
increase it. Hae used that same scenario ever since. So many times that
I ran into difficulties when I could not get more power and had to do
with what I had.
My whole thing is to fly the edges of the aircraft envelope at both
ends of the spectrum. Generally though, the lower speeds are where most
pilots run into problems and have the serious accidents.when they do
the silly stall/spin thing.
Silly because it should never happen. Serious of course when people get
hurt or killed. Stupid when the pilot fails to get the proper training.
arrggghhh Ol SOB

  #2  
Old January 19th 05, 07:21 PM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ol SOB,
I agree with you completely. Until I got the Pitts, about 75% of my
tailwheel time was within gliding distance of a field. I practice every
conceiveable approach, takeoff, engine failure, landing, you name it. I
liked to think I flew the airplane better at idle than I did at cruise and I
certainly knew what it was going to be like (or as near as you can get) if
the engine quit. I haven't carried any power in an approach in years, using
only a trickle if I have to to recover a low approach angle. And that's how
every airplane out to be flown regularly (on the edges of the envelope) to
keep your skills sharp and so you'll know what to do if everything goes to a
ball of chalk.

In the vein, some of the most fun I've had flying has been the hours I've
spent in a Cub or Tcraft under 300 feet and within the airfield fence.
Fantastic!!!

Shawn
wrote in message
oups.com...
Woooahhh...that test was done 35 years ago and yet the conclusion holds
true today!
Therein lies/lays the problem in todays flying! What has happened to
those skills?
I can vividly recall my primary instructor reducing power and saying,
"show me what ya got.." Then he said you can reduce it, but not
increase it. Hae used that same scenario ever since. So many times that
I ran into difficulties when I could not get more power and had to do
with what I had.
My whole thing is to fly the edges of the aircraft envelope at both
ends of the spectrum. Generally though, the lower speeds are where most
pilots run into problems and have the serious accidents.when they do
the silly stall/spin thing.
Silly because it should never happen. Serious of course when people get
hurt or killed. Stupid when the pilot fails to get the proper training.
arrggghhh Ol SOB



  #3  
Old January 19th 05, 07:23 PM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Now that, to me, describes real stick and rudder skills and sounds like a
hell of a lot of fun. I can't wait to get back in the Tcraft and give it a
go!

Shawn
wrote in message
oups.com...
Shawn,

As folks have told you, the answer is yes for most tailwheel airplanes
(not all, it's a question of elevator authority and c.g.).

Interestingly, in about 1970 the Iowa State University flying team used
an 85 hp. J-3 Cub as one of its competition airplanes in the national
championships of the Intercollegiate flying competition in Bozeman,
Montana. The rules at that time for the spot landing for tailwheel
airplanes was to measure the point at which the mains touched. On
approach, power could be reduced, but never reapplied. The Iowa State
guys figured out the minimum power setting to roll the tailwheel, but
keep the mains aloft in that Cub. They'd roll the tailwheel at some
point short of the "line", keep the mains in the air until just about
there, then close the throttle. They got so their accuracy was
incredible. After the meet, the rules were changed.

All the best,
Rick

ShawnD2112 wrote:
Got a question for you taildragger old-timers.

I've often thought about attitude and altitude control with power and


elevator in various combinations and have wondered if it's possible

to get a
taildragger to literally drag it's tailwheel on the runway with the

mains
off, and do it intentionally, kind of like slowflight but REALLY low

over
the runway. I mean, we often try to land tailwheel first, so I was
wondering if it's possible to set up to do it partially and prevent

the
mains from touching. I've tried in the Tcraft but can't seem to

manage it.

Anyone here ever done such a thing?

Shawn




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tail flapper failure Veeduber Home Built 2 May 22nd 04 07:52 AM
Tail slat question Guy Alcala Naval Aviation 2 February 14th 04 09:56 AM
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! Bruce E. Butts Owning 1 July 26th 03 12:34 PM
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! Bruce E. Butts Piloting 1 July 26th 03 12:34 PM
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. The Enlightenment Military Aviation 8 July 23rd 03 12:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.