A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Do you ever use standby on your transponder?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 05, 07:30 PM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Maule Driver wrote:

I don't. It stays on 24/7 (you know what I mean). 1200 unless given a
code. It effectively prevents "Maule, check your transponder" unless
using the wrong code.

I make no attempt to turn it off or go to standby while taxiing or
anything else. I've never been asked to go to standby or otherwise
questioned.

This has been discussed before but I'd suggest the everyone can do this
without causing a problem for anyone.



I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.

I also set "Standby" if I am a wingman in a formation (Only Lead
squawks).
  #2  
Old September 15th 05, 08:07 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Orval Fairbairn wrote:
[snip]
I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.

A perhaps ignorant question: What reflects that could damage the unit
and how could it damage the unit?

John
Solo Student

  #3  
Old September 15th 05, 08:25 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Orval,

I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.


Say again? Or rather, explain that, please.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #4  
Old September 15th 05, 10:22 PM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

Orval,

I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.


Say again? Or rather, explain that, please.


Most TXP antennae are belly-mounted. They send out a rather strong EM
signal that can reflect off the pavement and overwhelm the receiver
portion of the TXP, possibly damaging it.
  #5  
Old September 16th 05, 12:00 AM
Jay Masino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
Most TXP antennae are belly-mounted. They send out a rather strong EM
signal that can reflect off the pavement and overwhelm the receiver
portion of the TXP, possibly damaging it.


I would be surprised if most modern transponders don't protect against
this themselves by blanking the receiver during the transmit.

--- Jay


--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.OceanCityAirport.com
http://www.oc-Adolfos.com
  #6  
Old September 20th 05, 03:37 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:00:10 +0000, Jay Masino wrote:

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
Most TXP antennae are belly-mounted. They send out a rather strong EM
signal that can reflect off the pavement and overwhelm the receiver
portion of the TXP, possibly damaging it.


I would be surprised if most modern transponders don't protect against
this themselves by blanking the receiver during the transmit.

--- Jay


I would be surprised if the reflected power comes close to the power
received from radar...especially when near field with radar on field. Of
course, any additional information you can provide on this, I would be
most interested in reading!

Greg


  #7  
Old September 16th 05, 08:51 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Orval,

Most TXP antennae are belly-mounted. They send out a rather strong EM
signal that can reflect off the pavement and overwhelm the receiver
portion of the TXP, possibly damaging it.


I have never heard of that and find it implausible (unless possibly
taxiing on a bowl of concave sheet metal (PSP, anyone?)). Do you have
any examples of transponders actually damager by this?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #8  
Old September 20th 05, 04:49 PM
Tauno Voipio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:


Orval,


I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.


Say again? Or rather, explain that, please.



Most TXP antennae are belly-mounted. They send out a rather strong EM
signal that can reflect off the pavement and overwhelm the receiver
portion of the TXP, possibly damaging it.



1. The signal (about 200 W) is already on the feed line
even without a reflection.

2. The vertical antenna has a radiation minimum straight down.

3. The receiver is 60 MHz off the transmit frequency
(1030 and 1090 MHz).

4. The receiver is blanked and switched off the feedline
during the transmit pulses.

5. There is often an interlock line between the DME and
transponder to protect both receivers during pulse
transmit from either unit.

--

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi

  #9  
Old September 15th 05, 08:29 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news

I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.


What reflections would do that and how?


  #10  
Old September 15th 05, 10:27 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Orval Fairbairn wrote:




I set to "Standby" on the ground, to prevent reflections that could
damage the unit.



??? Now there's a new one.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Operation without a transponder flyer Piloting 11 September 14th 04 08:48 AM
Transponder test after static system opened? Jack I Owning 6 March 14th 04 03:09 PM
Transponder petition Ian Cant Soaring 11 February 28th 04 06:38 AM
More on transponder petition Ian Cant Soaring 1 February 27th 04 06:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.