A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine mixture guidelines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 1st 07, 01:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Engine mixture guidelines

"Newps" wrote in message
. ..


Jose wrote:
It's not the gauges, it's the fuel distribution. In order to run LOP
effectively each cylinder must peak at the same, or damned close, fuel
flow and therefore at the same time.



Yep, you're right. And this usually requires an engine mod, since stock
airplane engines are not very uniform. In any case, don't these mods
also come with a gauge for each cylender?



No, the GAMI's are six injectors that replace the standard six. They
reccomend an engine monitor but it's not necessary. As it happens I can
run real nice LOP without having to buy the GAMI's.


It's been much too long since I've known, and I'm too lazy to look it up on
New Year's Eve, but aren't GAMI injectors usually installed using an engine
monitor to obtain the best match for each injector and cylinder combination?
After the inital shop work with an analyzer/monitor, the use of an engine
monitor by the aircraft operator is recommended, but not required--exactly
as you stated.

BTW, I've always presumed that the advantage of a set of GAMI injectors was
simply that they guaranteed a matched set; but you could also have a
similarly matched set of stock injectors by carefull selection from a
sizeable batch, or simply by fortunate happenstance. Is this your real
world experience, or are you basically using the "hottest cylinder" method,
or both?

Peter


  #32  
Old January 1st 07, 04:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Michael Rhodes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Engine mixture guidelines

On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:05:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
wrote:


It seems, then, that the only reason to cross through the red box is
to improve fuel economy (?).


Fuel econonmy, in context with aviation, should not end with a (?).
Complex chores, emotional distractions, boring (if not hypnotic)
seat-warming, unpredictable winds, unpredictable landscape for
touching down; especially at night. Fuel economy could too easily be
life or death, or a major inconvenience. All part of the adventure of
flight. The 'red box', then, doesn't look so threatening, but
intimate knowledge of one's aircraft. It is control of substance.


Enjoyed the thread, excuse the interjection. Never heard of running
LOP at 65% power.
--
Mike
  #33  
Old January 1st 07, 09:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Engine mixture guidelines

Michael Rhodes writes:

Fuel econonmy, in context with aviation, should not end with a (?).
Complex chores, emotional distractions, boring (if not hypnotic)
seat-warming, unpredictable winds, unpredictable landscape for
touching down; especially at night. Fuel economy could too easily be
life or death, or a major inconvenience. All part of the adventure of
flight. The 'red box', then, doesn't look so threatening, but
intimate knowledge of one's aircraft. It is control of substance.


Don't most GA pilots routinely take off with full tanks, anyway?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #34  
Old January 1st 07, 09:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Engine mixture guidelines

gpsman writes:

Making whole-hearted attempts may prove most effective.


One step at a time.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #35  
Old January 1st 07, 01:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Engine mixture guidelines


"Michael Rhodes" wrote in message
...


Never heard of running LOP at 65% power.


And you probably won't unless the engine is turbo'ed.


  #36  
Old January 1st 07, 03:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default Engine mixture guidelines

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Don't most GA pilots routinely take off with full tanks, anyway?


PLEASE DON'T feed this troll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Allen
  #37  
Old January 1st 07, 04:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Engine mixture guidelines



Matt Barrow wrote:
"Michael Rhodes" wrote in message
...


Never heard of running LOP at 65% power.



And you probably won't unless the engine is turbo'ed.


Why not? I run LOP at 75% with my IO-520.


  #38  
Old January 2nd 07, 02:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Michael Rhodes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Engine mixture guidelines

On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:43:05 GMT, A Lieberma
wrote:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Don't most GA pilots routinely take off with full tanks, anyway?


PLEASE DON'T feed this troll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Allen


Don't feed, Lieberma? Or don't pay? For feeding? Do you advise
thieves, Lieberma?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The bankers, the harlots of
Wall Street, who 'love' all except those homebound, Leiberma? The
lion is going to burn you all, Lieberma, whether I get paid or not.
And likewise I will fully enjoy it; knowing what justice is, Lieberma,
and the lack of it.

It will be it.
--
Michael
  #39  
Old January 2nd 07, 04:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Robert Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 81
Default Engine mixture guidelines

HUH?

Michael Rhodes wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:43:05 GMT, A Lieberma
wrote:


Mxsmanic wrote in
m:


Don't most GA pilots routinely take off with full tanks, anyway?


PLEASE DON'T feed this troll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Allen



Don't feed, Lieberma? Or don't pay? For feeding? Do you advise
thieves, Lieberma?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The bankers, the harlots of
Wall Street, who 'love' all except those homebound, Leiberma? The
lion is going to burn you all, Lieberma, whether I get paid or not.
And likewise I will fully enjoy it; knowing what justice is, Lieberma,
and the lack of it.

It will be it.
--
Michael

  #40  
Old January 2nd 07, 09:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Engine mixture guidelines

Bds,

There are no consequences of doing anything wrong in MSFS. That's why you
like it, remember?


You've put the major problem of our resident troll in two neat sentences.
Nice!

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
ROP masking of engine problems Roger Long Owning 4 September 27th 04 07:36 PM
Emergency Procedures RD Piloting 13 April 11th 04 08:25 PM
My Engine Fire!! [email protected] Piloting 21 April 2nd 04 05:02 PM
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts Eric D Rotorcraft 22 March 5th 04 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.