![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jan 21, 12:18 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: wrote : On Jan 20, 3:51 pm, wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:28:27 -0800 (PST), wrote: Where on the checklist is the instruction to flip this switch? The manual states: At 2000 ft CABIN PRESS MODE SEL.............................Check AUTO ENG 1 & 2 BLEED, APU BLEED.......................OFF P/B DITCHING.....................................ON P/A............................................."TOU CHDOWN IN ONE MINUTE" Aim for an impact with an 11° body angle and minimum ROD. Poster However if you're also working an inflight engine unstart which takes precedence? Clarification: two engine unstart w/inflight emergency. Quite a bit different from a situation that begins at cruise altitude or with only *one* emergency rather than a sequence of events. As a PAX I would rather know that the crew are concentrating on landing the aircraft (ditching) as gently as possible. That silly switch won't do a thing to save the buoyancy if the fuselage is fractured by a rough ditching...a point one everyone seems to miss. Exactly. I would hazard (grin) a guess that the final review will show them to have maintained situational awareness with the concomitant priority management. I'd agree, it;'s hard to argue wiht success. Like many accidents of this sort, these gusy will have rewritten the book. Bertie With all my arguments against worrying about the dip, er, 'ditch' switch I wonder of what benefit it would truly be in any condition other dead level calm? Ditching at see would (I would think) most often occur in conditions that would tear up the aircraft sufficiently to make 'the Switch' totally useless. In this particular case it appears, from reading an article early on, that one or more pax may have partially opened a rear door and allowed water ingress and this, more than anything, contributed to the tail down sinking. It all comes down to basic necessities. I've had two high speed parachute malfunctions and my first reaction was "what do I do to get a chute open right f'ing now?" I didn't worry until after that occurred as to wear I would land or what I would have for dinner. You really have to experience something to realize the difference a 'real' emergency will make in your focus. Failure to maintain that focus results in the 'oh ****' moments. ------------------------------------------- Nice fantasy........ |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Flydive wrote in : wrote: On Jan 20, 10:11 am, Flydive wrote: wrote: Low priority compared to flying the plane, deadstick, in a congested urban environment. Or would you rather he spend time looking for a button on the panel? Well it takes 3 seconds to flip the switch, you should know where is located. one pilot is flying the aircraft, the other one is assisting and going through the checklist. Yep. Where on the checklist is the instruction to flip this switch? One may assume that since it was not flipped it was not at the top of the list and thus was of a lower priority. Flying the airplane and only those steps necessary to (1) avoid obstacles while (2) setting up for landing are of high(est) priority. The ditch switch is at the top of the ditching checklist and usually is a memory item, if you are going to ditch I would say is a priority item. Only if you have time. Ditchig checklists don't have any memory items at all, and in fact Bus checklists, with most airlines, have very few memory drills. Lkikely the only memory checks are the engine fire drill and a pressurisations blowout, and those would have only the initial itiems on them. Well, maybe the Airbus checklist doesn't have memory items, mine does, the ditch switch is one of them. Other aircraft probably do too Airliners have 2 pilots and usually only one of them is handling the controls, the other one takes care of the emergency and assists the flying pilot. You say setting up for landing, well if you are "landing" No, you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance. In this case, the non handler was probably try to relight and telling the cabin and ATC waht was happening. They just had multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that situation. I believe they did not communicate much with ATC, and that task can be done by the flying pilot, no much overload to push the PTT and say "we are going into the Hudson" as it seems they said. What part of assisting does not agree with "you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance"? in water the water, prepare the aircraft for ditching is part of it, a priority. Nope, not in this case. if they didn;t fly the airplane, the holes in the bottom of the airplane would have been the least of their problems, since they would have made significantly larger holes. Bertie One of them was handling the aircraft and did a great job, the assisting pilot was assisting and following the checklist, you just have to pick the correct one. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
There were dozens of things he would be doing. One, determining waht the problem was. Then, dealing with the immediate problem, an engine failure. Immediate relight attempt. Probably the APU was fired up to assist in the relight. as they would have been too slow for a windmill start. Then a quick call to ATC and probalby a couple of nav selections for the captain to look for a runway they could plunk it on.Then back to the relight drill. We're taught to keep trying that to the bitter end, BTW. They take a minute or so so he wouldn't have had time for more than one or two, and that would have been after the APU had fired up, say at abotu 1200'. A couple of calls to the cabin would have been tossed in their somewhere as well. The act of picking up the book and finding the ditching checklist would have taken a good 20-30 seconds...Time they simply did not have. And this scenario is not done in the sim, so there would have been no trigger for it. BTW, I'm beign generous with the actions they may or may not have accomplished in the time they had. But all of them would come ahead of doing a "nice to do " ditching checklist. Bertie The problem was multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that situation. Do not know who did the ATC call, but that can be handled by the flying pilot. There was no runway to look for, once they decided that TEB was too far, and it seems that the decision to ditch was taken quite quickly, so no really nav selections. Once they decided to ditch because they figured that the engine would not be restarted, then no more relight attempt. If as you say they were going through the relight procedure, they would already had the book in their hands, no need to pick it up, just had to find the right procedure. I do not know about the Airbus, but in a lot of aircraft ditching is considered an emergency, once you decided to ditch that is the emergency procedure you are following. Again, maybe the Airbus is different, but for example on my aircraft the ditch switch does more than "sealing" fuselage, it does: -depressurizes the cabin (so you can open the doors) -Shuts down the packs (so no risk of pressurization -closes the outflow valves (so no water can get in. Check list also calls for pulling the APU and engines fire handles, you probably don't want to ditch with APU running (or engine you are still trying to relight) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Flydive wrote in : wrote: On Jan 20, 10:11 am, Flydive wrote: wrote: Low priority compared to flying the plane, deadstick, in a congested urban environment. Or would you rather he spend time looking for a button on the panel? Well it takes 3 seconds to flip the switch, you should know where is located. one pilot is flying the aircraft, the other one is assisting and going through the checklist. Yep. Where on the checklist is the instruction to flip this switch? One may assume that since it was not flipped it was not at the top of the list and thus was of a lower priority. Flying the airplane and only those steps necessary to (1) avoid obstacles while (2) setting up for landing are of high(est) priority. The ditch switch is at the top of the ditching checklist and usually is a memory item, if you are going to ditch I would say is a priority item. Only if you have time. Ditchig checklists don't have any memory items at all, and in fact Bus checklists, with most airlines, have very few memory drills. Lkikely the only memory checks are the engine fire drill and a pressurisations blowout, and those would have only the initial itiems on them. Well, maybe the Airbus checklist doesn't have memory items, mine does, the ditch switch is one of them. Other aircraft probably do too Really? What airlane is that? Airliners have 2 pilots and usually only one of them is handling the controls, the other one takes care of the emergency and assists the flying pilot. You say setting up for landing, well if you are "landing" No, you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance. In this case, the non handler was probably try to relight and telling the cabin and ATC waht was happening. They just had multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that I would situation. I believe they did not communicate much with ATC, and that task can be done by the flying pilot, no much overload to push the PTT and say "we are going into the Hudson" as it seems they said. What part of assisting does not agree with "you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance"? Good grief. in water the water, prepare the aircraft for ditching is part of it, a priority. Nope, not in this case. if they didn;t fly the airplane, the holes in the bottom of the airplane would have been the least of their problems, since they would have made significantly larger holes. Bertie One of them was handling the aircraft and did a great job, the assisting pilot was assisting and following the checklist, you just have to pick the correct one. i have done. Bertie |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: There were dozens of things he would be doing. One, determining waht the problem was. Then, dealing with the immediate problem, an engine failure. Immediate relight attempt. Probably the APU was fired up to assist in the relight. as they would have been too slow for a windmill start. Then a quick call to ATC and probalby a couple of nav selections for the captain to look for a runway they could plunk it on.Then back to the relight drill. We're taught to keep trying that to the bitter end, BTW. They take a minute or so so he wouldn't have had time for more than one or two, and that would have been after the APU had fired up, say at abotu 1200'. A couple of calls to the cabin would have been tossed in their somewhere as well. The act of picking up the book and finding the ditching checklist would have taken a good 20-30 seconds...Time they simply did not have. And this scenario is not done in the sim, so there would have been no trigger for it. BTW, I'm beign generous with the actions they may or may not have accomplished in the time they had. But all of them would come ahead of doing a "nice to do " ditching checklist. Bertie The problem was multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that situation. Do not know who did the ATC call, but that can be handled by the flying pilot. There was no runway to look for, once they decided that TEB was too far, and it seems that the decision to ditch was taken quite quickly, so no really nav selections. Once they decided to ditch because they figured that the engine would not be restarted, then no more relight attempt. If as you say they were going through the relight procedure, they would already had the book in their hands, no need to pick it up, just had to find the right procedure. I do not know about the Airbus, but in a lot of aircraft ditching is considered an emergency, once you decided to ditch that is the emergency procedure you are following. Again, maybe the Airbus is different, but for example on my aircraft the ditch switch does more than "sealing" fuselage, it does: -depressurizes the cabin (so you can open the doors) -Shuts down the packs (so no risk of pressurization -closes the outflow valves (so no water can get in. Nope, it just closes the holes in the belly. Check list also calls for pulling the APU and engines fire handles, you probably don't want to ditch with APU running (or engine you are still trying to relight) Well, maybe you should go and drive your airplane into the hudson and show em how it's done. Bertie |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Well, maybe the Airbus checklist doesn't have memory items, mine does, the ditch switch is one of them. Other aircraft probably do too Really? What airlane is that? Bombardier Global Express Airliners have 2 pilots and usually only one of them is handling the controls, the other one takes care of the emergency and assists the flying pilot. You say setting up for landing, well if you are "landing" No, you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance. In this case, the non handler was probably try to relight and telling the cabin and ATC waht was happening. They just had multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that I would situation. I believe they did not communicate much with ATC, and that task can be done by the flying pilot, no much overload to push the PTT and say "we are going into the Hudson" as it seems they said. What part of assisting does not agree with "you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance"? Good grief. Ok, maybe you have the transcript with a lengthy communication between the Airbus and the ATC, is not what I heard, mind to share? You are really unable to push the PTT and tell something to ATC while flying the aircraft. Bertie One of them was handling the aircraft and did a great job, the assisting pilot was assisting and following the checklist, you just have to pick the correct one. i have done. Bertie Right the catastrophic engines faillure restarting procedure till water touch down checklist |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Again, maybe the Airbus is different, but for example on my aircraft the ditch switch does more than "sealing" fuselage, it does: -depressurizes the cabin (so you can open the doors) -Shuts down the packs (so no risk of pressurization -closes the outflow valves (so no water can get in. Nope, it just closes the holes in the belly. As I said probably the Airbus is different, on other aircraft the switch does a bit more. Check list also calls for pulling the APU and engines fire handles, you probably don't want to ditch with APU running (or engine you are still trying to relight) Well, maybe you should go and drive your airplane into the hudson and show em how it's done. Bertie Never said I would have done a better job, and personally I prefer to complete the flight to the destination airport rather than go into the water, we were discussing about the ditch switch and if to flip it or not. If the emergency check list calls for it is probably a good idea to do it, then if you prefer the creative way, well is up to you. I agree they did a great job, at the end everybody got out alive. That doesn't mean that we cannot talk about what could have been differently. You for example would have been trying to restart your engines after a probable catastrophic failure till the end. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Well, maybe the Airbus checklist doesn't have memory items, mine does, the ditch switch is one of them. Other aircraft probably do too Really? What airlane is that? Bombardier Global Express Oh God a Barbie jet. Airliners have 2 pilots and usually only one of them is handling the controls, the other one takes care of the emergency and assists the flying pilot. You say setting up for landing, well if you are "landing" No, you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance. In this case, the non handler was probably try to relight and telling the cabin and ATC waht was happening. They just had multiple bird strikes, with most probably catastrophic engine failure, I don't think you are going to try a relight in that I would situation. I believe they did not communicate much with ATC, and that task can be done by the flying pilot, no much overload to push the PTT and say "we are going into the Hudson" as it seems they said. What part of assisting does not agree with "you tell him to do what you need him to do in the circumstance"? Good grief. Ok, maybe you have the transcript with a lengthy communication between the Airbus and the ATC, is not what I heard, mind to share? You are really unable to push the PTT and tell something to ATC while flying the aircraft. Bertie One of them was handling the aircraft and did a great job, the assisting pilot was assisting and following the checklist, you just have to pick the correct one. i have done. Bertie Right the catastrophic engines faillure restarting procedure till water touch down checklist OK, let me explain this to you one last time. When the situation is outside of traing and time is short, the checklist goes out the window. End of story. The reason we do so much training is that when something happens, the training is what takes over. Since we don;'t train for a double engine failure after takeoff in a built up area, there is no procedure and it is up to the commander to cobble something together in the time available. Your continued whining that the checklist is that important demonstrates inexperience or idiocy. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the former. Bertie |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Again, maybe the Airbus is different, but for example on my aircraft the ditch switch does more than "sealing" fuselage, it does: -depressurizes the cabin (so you can open the doors) -Shuts down the packs (so no risk of pressurization -closes the outflow valves (so no water can get in. Nope, it just closes the holes in the belly. As I said probably the Airbus is different, on other aircraft the switch does a bit more. Check list also calls for pulling the APU and engines fire handles, you probably don't want to ditch with APU running (or engine you are still trying to relight) Well, maybe you should go and drive your airplane into the hudson and show em how it's done. Bertie Never said I would have done a better job, and personally I prefer to complete the flight to the destination airport rather than go into the water, we were discussing about the ditch switch and if to flip it or not. No, you're not. You're second guessing the crew. If the emergency check list calls for it is probably a good idea to do it, then if you prefer the creative way, well is up to you. I agree they did a great job, at the end everybody got out alive. That doesn't mean that we cannot talk about what could have been differently. You for example would have been trying to restart your engines after a probable catastrophic failure till the end. Yep. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|