irrefutable bottom line about picture ID's

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:3Q55d.105477$MQ5.2868@attbi_s52...
So.... Did you get a date, or get to take him home, afterwards?

Actually, he seemed to be more interested in Mary, and the plane...in that
order!

;-)
--
Jay Honeck

Understandable! ;-)
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/23/2004

In article ink.net,
Tom Fleischman wrote:

That's nonsense. Have you done any research at all into what Kerry's
positions are on these things? Have you read his web site? His position
on Iraq is and has always been crystal clear.

you're kidding me.

--
Bob Noel
Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal"
oh yeah baby.

It's all here, clear as day, written in the english language:

Ah, shoot, I can't tell. Is that version 5.2, or 6.1 of "John Kerry's
Position on Iraq"? Or should I wait for the latest patch?

He's been trying to have his cake and eat it, too, under the assumption that
no one is watching too closely.

Thank goodness for video tape, or he might have been able to pull that off.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

If you guys would take an hour or so and do a little bit of reading
instead of relying on Faux News for all of your information you might
realize that you are being misled and disinformed.

Sorry, my main source of information during this political season is
National Public Radio, and newspapers. I rarely watch television.

Despite this, I STILL haven't been able to figure out where Kerry stands,
other than that he is running as the "anti-Bush." The poor guy just hasn't
been able to get any traction on anything but Viet Nam, which falls squarely
into my "who cares?" category.

An aside: Did you, by any chance, happen to see the press coverage noting
that Kerry -- a man running as a populist, common-man Democrat -- is worth
over 40 times what our supposed "rich, oil-baron Republican" President is?

After I stopped laughing at that irony, I wept at the ignorance. If only
the poor inner city folk, who for generations now have instinctively pulled
the all-Democrat ticket lever, could read a newspaper!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Tom Fleischman wrote:


That's nonsense. Have you done any research at all into what Kerry's
positions are on these things? Have you read his web site? His position
on Iraq is and has always been crystal clear.

I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it. Yep, crystal clear.

"Tom Fleischman" wrote in message
rthlink.net...


Just since he's been a pres. candidate (well that's
actually since he was about 16, but that's another matter) he has been
the
pro-war candidate, the anti-war candidate, the anti-anti-war candidate,
and
now the pro-anti-war candidate. The only way to explain John Kerry's
policy
positions are (1) chaos theory and (2) he will say anything whatsoever
to
get elected. What he'll actually do in office, who the hell knows?

That's nonsense. Have you done any research at all into what Kerry's
positions are on these things? Have you read his web site? His position
on Iraq is and has always been crystal clear.

Tom,

I'm a Bostonian and have been involved in politics up here for quite some
time so yeah, I know John Kerry.

In the 80s he was a consistent Massachusetts Democrat--favored the Nuclear
Freeze, opposed deploying Pershing missiles, balh blah. This carried through
to 1991 when he voted against the Gulf War, thus costing him the very good
shot he had at the VP slot on the 1992 ticket.

He learned, and throughout the 90s never missed an opportunity to say Saddam
was not living up to the deals he made with the UN, that the French and
Russians were compromised because they wanted to do business with him, and
so on. He out-hawked many of the hawks and even criticized the Clinton
administration on occasions for not pushing hard enough.

Even here in Mass., I know relatively few people who can say, or even much
care, what John Kerry's position on Iraq is. Their position is that they'd
rather have a block of wood in the Oval Office than W, and that's fine.

To the degree that I've discerned a consistency in John Kerry's actions over
the years, it's a tendency to talk tough on the evening news shows, and then
agree with whatever the appropriate UN committee decides to do the next day.
He's been a profoundly liberal internationalist as long as he's been in the
Senate. And that's what he'd be as President. Now he's starting to say so,
which I suspect will fire the base up nicely, but will cost him the general
election.

Best,
-cwk.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:25:32 GMT, Icebound wrote:

"Some foreigner comes here on a mission....". No-where is it carved in
stone that a terrorist has to be foreign... as in McVeigh, for example.


Letting aside all the terrorist talk and more 'security':
can somebody come up with some numbers on how many foreigners come to the
USA only for flight training and what impact on this (avitaion) industry
they have?
and what alltogether impact on economy they have (they need housing, food,
car rental, ...)? Are there some areas/FBOs that are heavily dependant on
foreign pilots (like Florida or around Wichita) and the money they bring to
the country?

#m

--
The more one is absorbed in fighting Evil,
the less one is tempted to place the Good
in question. (J.P. Sartre)

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:59:49 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:

Somehow, some way, the Left trash talks "multi-national corporations" and
"big corporations" as if they were messengers of evil, when, in fact,
corporations represent the ultimate, perfect expression of communal
ownership of capital.

*hehe* :-))
I think I .sig that.

#m

--
The more one is absorbed in fighting Evil,
the less one is tempted to place the Good
in question. (J.P. Sartre)

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:00:58 -0400, Andrew Gideon wrote:

I know! We should pass a law requiring all foreign nationals to wear
tinfoil hats with red streamers at least three feet long. That will fix
the problem.

Considering the people making these rules, I'd not be surprised to see your
suggestion (tongue in cheek, I know) taking effect tomorrow.

How about a badge for je^Wforeigners?

- Andrew

#m

--
Somehow, some way, the Left trash talks "multi-national corporations" and
"big corporations" as if they were messengers of evil, when, in fact,
corporations represent the ultimate, perfect expression of communal
ownership of capital. (Jay Honeck in r.a.p.)

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:09:24 GMT, C Kingsbury wrote:

Even here in Mass., I know relatively few people who can say, or even much
care, what John Kerry's position on Iraq is. Their position is that they'd
rather have a block of wood in the Oval Office than W, and that's fine.

:-)))))

but: it is a rather bad stand when you only get the vote because you are
the lesser evel or because "whoever wins the election unless it is W".

#m

--
Somehow, some way, the Left trash talks "multi-national corporations" and
"big corporations" as if they were messengers of evil, when, in fact,
corporations represent the ultimate, perfect expression of communal
ownership of capital. (Jay Honeck in r.a.p.)