Landing without flaps

buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)

--
Dudley Henriques

Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?


Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?

--
Dudley Henriques

buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:31 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

So what else is bothering you today Mr CFI :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

It doesn't bother me, it cracks me the hell up. The reasoning escape
me as to how a person above the age of 11 can have such a meltdown
over two words displayed on an internet webpage. I really feel that
anger, a lot of times, comes through as a manifestation of a strong
desire to express how better they think they are over everyone else. I
was the same way when I was in high school. I was a life guard at the
local city pool, and would try my hardest to look for reasons to yell
at kids to express to the world how great I am. If I saw a kid splash
another kid, I for some reason I would get so angry and make them both
sit out for an hour or two, regardless if anyone got hurt or was
bothered. Eventually I grew out of it though. I realized I wasn't the
center of the universe, as do most people as they mature.

It just kind of gives me a smirk to know that someone who apparently
is so decorated in the industry as you, can be so immature in that
regard.
Whatever floats your boat my friend. :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 4, 3:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)

--
Dudley Henriques

Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?

Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?

--
Dudley Henriques

How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but you are not
the center of my universe, or anyone else's; you only appear to be the
center of your own. You can go on pretending that your constant
mentioning of me "not being a CFI", or "e-firing" me from an imaginary
job position of yours is somehow hurting me, because I can't put it
into words how much it just isn't.

And anyways, I'd be crazy to give you ANY personal information of
mine, considering how much of an unstable person you have proven
yourself to be.

LOL you'll probably find something offensive about my name or
something and fly off the handle by mailing my information to all your
crash investigators buddies...

On Mar 4, 4:46 pm, buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:



buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)

--
Dudley Henriques

Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?

Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?

--
Dudley Henriques

How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but you are not
the center of my universe, or anyone else's; you only appear to be the
center of your own. You can go on pretending that your constant
mentioning of me "not being a CFI", or "e-firing" me from an imaginary
job position of yours is somehow hurting me, because I can't put it
into words how much it just isn't.

And anyways, I'd be crazy to give you ANY personal information of
mine, considering how much of an unstable person you have proven
yourself to be.

LOL you'll probably find something offensive about my name or
something and fly off the handle by mailing my information to all your
crash investigators buddies...

but just to shut you up, he

http://xs.to/xs.php?h=xs225&d=08103&f=license856.jpg

buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)
--
Dudley Henriques
Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?
Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?

--
Dudley Henriques

How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but you are not
the center of my universe, or anyone else's; you only appear to be the
center of your own. You can go on pretending that your constant
mentioning of me "not being a CFI", or "e-firing" me from an imaginary
job position of yours is somehow hurting me, because I can't put it
into words how much it just isn't.

And anyways, I'd be crazy to give you ANY personal information of
mine, considering how much of an unstable person you have proven
yourself to be.

LOL you'll probably find something offensive about my name or
something and fly off the handle by mailing my information to all your
crash investigators buddies...
Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
that the system allowed you through.

Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
instruct.

I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
means something to others who frequent this forum.



--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 4, 7:30 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)
--
Dudley Henriques
Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?
Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?

--
Dudley Henriques

How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but you are not
the center of my universe, or anyone else's; you only appear to be the
center of your own. You can go on pretending that your constant
mentioning of me "not being a CFI", or "e-firing" me from an imaginary
job position of yours is somehow hurting me, because I can't put it
into words how much it just isn't.

And anyways, I'd be crazy to give you ANY personal information of
mine, considering how much of an unstable person you have proven
yourself to be.

LOL you'll probably find something offensive about my name or
something and fly off the handle by mailing my information to all your
crash investigators buddies...

Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
that the system allowed you through.

Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
instruct.

I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
means something to others who frequent this forum.

--
Dudley Henriques

I've learned plenty.

Dan wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:30 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
that might be of some consequence.:-)
--
Dudley Henriques
Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
What would we do without it?
Whatever pleases you, but you still would never fly in one of my
operations.
I still would offer you a challenge to present either your rating number
or some proof that you are a rated CFI. I just don't believe it.
My email address is on all my posts. You don't have to display this is
public. Just send me your name and certificate number. No one will know
but th two of us.
Of course I can't make you do this. It would have to be voluntary on
your part.
How bout it?
--
Dudley Henriques
How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but you are not
the center of my universe, or anyone else's; you only appear to be the
center of your own. You can go on pretending that your constant
mentioning of me "not being a CFI", or "e-firing" me from an imaginary
job position of yours is somehow hurting me, because I can't put it
into words how much it just isn't.
And anyways, I'd be crazy to give you ANY personal information of
mine, considering how much of an unstable person you have proven
yourself to be.
LOL you'll probably find something offensive about my name or
something and fly off the handle by mailing my information to all your
crash investigators buddies...
Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
that the system allowed you through.

Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
instruct.

I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
means something to others who frequent this forum.

--
Dudley Henriques

I've learned plenty.

Now here's an ambiguous comment :-) Am I the bad guy or the good guy in
this novel? :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 4, 7:37 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

I've learned plenty.

Now here's an ambiguous comment :-) Am I the bad guy or the good guy in
this novel? :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

I don't have affinity for folks named "buttman." Talk about ambiguous.

The only Dudley I ever knew was Do-Right, and as a Mountie, he was a
good chap.

Dan

On Mar 4, 5:30 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
that the system allowed you through.

You're the one who has been harping on me for the past few months
trying to get me to "prove" I'm really a CFI. I finally do and you
blow it off. Thats basically what I expected.


Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
instruct.

You realize I've posted maybe 15 times in my entire 3 year Usenet
career on the subject of flight instructing? I'd LOOOVE to hear your
case against me.

So you're with a CFI applicant. Today is the day where you give him
the "how not to be a CFI" talk. You go over to your computer, load up
Usenet, and begin to show this person all the horrors internet user
Buttman has brought upon the profession. I really don't even care
about specifics, but I'd really like to know what kind of things you'd
say.

Based on your posting here, you'd probably just make some blanket
claims "this guy is a horrible instructor", the try to justify it
solely by the virtue of the fact you have some achievements, rather
than any kind of logic or reasoning, "This is true because I've been
in the industry for 200 years and I've worked with blah blah blah".
I've not read a single thing you've posted here where you've made ANY
attempt to justify your points other than with your signature file.


I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
means something to others who frequent this forum.

Don't flatter yourself.

On Mar 4, 8:14 pm, buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 5:30 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
that the system allowed you through.

You're the one who has been harping on me for the past few months
trying to get me to "prove" I'm really a CFI. I finally do and you
blow it off. Thats basically what I expected.



Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
instruct.

You realize I've posted maybe 15 times in my entire 3 year Usenet
career on the subject of flight instructing? I'd LOOOVE to hear your
case against me.

So you're with a CFI applicant. Today is the day where you give him
the "how not to be a CFI" talk. You go over to your computer, load up
Usenet, and begin to show this person all the horrors internet user
Buttman has brought upon the profession. I really don't even care
about specifics, but I'd really like to know what kind of things you'd
say.

Based on your posting here, you'd probably just make some blanket
claims "this guy is a horrible instructor", the try to justify it
solely by the virtue of the fact you have some achievements, rather
than any kind of logic or reasoning, "This is true because I've been
in the industry for 200 years and I've worked with blah blah blah".
I've not read a single thing you've posted here where you've made ANY
attempt to justify your points other than with your signature file.

I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
means something to others who frequent this forum.

Don't flatter yourself.

Dude... you might be Bill Kershner reincarnated, but I'd be tempted to
stall-spin it in if I had to listen to you blather on in the right
seat of a 152.

..