A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future Club Training Gliders



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old November 24th 10, 09:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Johan Nykvist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Future Club Training Gliders

At 09:10 24 November 2010, Bruce Hoult wrote:
On Nov 24, 1:18=A0pm, Johan Nykvist wrote:
In my oppinion, Duo, DG 500, DG1000 (a beast to ground handle) ect
are not primary trainers. Not rugged enough..


What do you base this on?

We just moved from Twin Astirs to DG1000s. I can't see any way in
which a fixed gear DG1000 Club is more of a beast to ground handle
than a Twin Astir! In particular, lifting the tail to put the dolly on
is considerably lighter.

That this is so should be fairly obvious from the fact that a properly
ballasted DG1000 Club is very nearly balanced on the main wheel and
may sit on either the nose wheel or the tail wheel.

Lacking nose wheels, and not wanting the nose to come into contact
with the ground either at rest or when using the wheel brake, the main
wheel on the Twin Astir is considerably further forward than it is on
a 3-wheel undercarriage glider such as the ASK-21, Twin II/III, or
DG1000 Club. The same is also true of the non-Club version of the
DG1000 -- the retractable wheel is very far forward and there is a lot
of weight on the tail.

Perhaps you are not distinguishing between the (cheaper) Club and
standard versions of the DG1000?

Here's what I'm talking about:

http://is.gd/hGLKd

I'm also not sure where you get the "Not rugged enough" opinion. They
seem to be very well built.


Oh, Im sorry!
I didnt think of the club version. My experience is from
DG1000T. Its retractble landingear is hard work to operate. Also im not
sure its rugged enough for longterm abuse from learners
somtimes hard landings...well, some experineced pilots too! =)
Not to mention the electrical gear..

Personally I think all of them is great gliders. But maby not for basic
training. I ofcoarse can be wrong. My main point is they might be a to
tricky to for beginners (to hard learning curve) to
maintain correct airspeed at landings ect. Due to the higher performance,
its accelerates very quickly when lowering the attitude.

Is my personal oppinion. Sorry for not being clear enogh.

The perfect world, I think, would be ASK 21 for basic training and
a DuoT, DG1000T or ArcusT for the more advanced training.

Nice ship on the link!! =)





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Club Class Gliders Sam Giltner[_1_] Soaring 4 December 3rd 08 03:28 AM
Basic Training Gliders Derek Copeland Soaring 35 December 26th 05 02:19 PM
Basic Training Gliders Justin Craig Soaring 0 December 6th 05 10:07 PM
Basic Training Gliders Justin Craig Soaring 0 December 6th 05 10:07 PM
Soaring club close to NYC, with high-performance gliders City Dweller Soaring 9 September 29th 05 11:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.