If WTC 7 came down from fire and debris ..

TRUTH wrote:
Roger wrote in
:
[snip]
There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.
[snip]


They obviously did so without examining all the evidence.

Nothing could be further from the TRUTH.

In article ,
on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:01:07 -0500,
Roger attempted to say .....

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:27:32 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:

silliness Snip

Back to this silliness again.
Do you trust pre positioned explosives to go off as planned when there is a
rather large raging fire in the structure ?

There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.


So very true.


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article ,
on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:54:59 GMT,
TRUTH attempted to say .....

Roger wrote in
:

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:27:32 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:

silliness Snip

Back to this silliness again.
Do you trust pre positioned explosives to go off as planned when there
is a rather large raging fire in the structure ?

There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.


They obviously did so without examining all the evidence.

In your opinion.






--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:54:59 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

Roger wrote in
:

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:27:32 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:

silliness Snip

Back to this silliness again.
Do you trust pre positioned explosives to go off as planned when there
is a rather large raging fire in the structure ?

There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com




They obviously did so without examining all the evidence.

I rest my case :-))

And as there is no reason to follow this any farther.
Thread Plonk

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com