If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
george writes:
Bull****. Plain and simple. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ60fitlU70 All I see is a stupid pilot violating Federal air regulations and overstressing his (rented?) aircraft. |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
JohnT writes:
What physical sensations are you referring to? All of them. Some people are very into strong sensations. You don't fly and you know nothing about flying. I have flown in airplanes many times. The sensations felt by pilots are identical to those felt by passengers. |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:39:01 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: Hatunen writes: Really? How many private pilots do you know well enough to make that claim? Quite a few. If. I'm not particulary fond of hitting tubulence when I'm in an airliner, but physical sensations are hard to avoid if you fly much. Sure, but they are not an integral part of flying, unless you fly specifically Good grief. That's an almost stupid thing to say. for the thrill of sensations. There are probably a few pilots who do things in the air for the thrill of it. And there are some stunt pilots who do it for pay or to win prizes. But as the old pilots' saw goes, "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots." But there are plenty of undesired sensations in flying even for cautious pilots. There are lots of YouTube videos of inexperienced, stupid pilots doing just that. How many? Two? Four? A dozen? They don't always identify themselves, but eventually their names tend to appear in NTSB reports. You know this how? Are you psychic? Although I admit, as I said above, thre are no old, bold pilots. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
|
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
Hatunen writes:
And all of those lowtime private pilots can spot a non-pilot who thinks he knows-it-all from a computer game a mile away. Since they are not important, what they do or don't spot is irrelevant. They are just noise. |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
Hatunen writes:
Good grief. That's an almost stupid thing to say. Not if you have an instrument rating. There are probably a few pilots who do things in the air for the thrill of it. They are among the most at risk for accidents. Usually, they are inexperienced (in part because they are more likely to kill themselves). However, there are idiots with experience, too--see Pinnacle Airlines flight 3701. But as the old pilots' saw goes, "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots." Yes. But there are many young and would-be bold pilots posting here. The kind who would buy a Cirrus if they could afford it. But there are plenty of undesired sensations in flying even for cautious pilots. Yes--that's one of the drawbacks of flying for real vs. flying a sim. I hate having my ears pop, for example. How many? Two? Four? A dozen? By my count, perhaps several hundred. You know this how? Are you psychic? I know this from studies that show a link between this type of behavior and accidents. It's not limited to airplanes, either: exactly the same tendencies can be seen among automobile drivers. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:40:59 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: george writes: Bull****. Plain and simple. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ60fitlU70 All I see is a stupid pilot violating Federal air regulations and overstressing his (rented?) aircraft. Again you display your actual lack of knowledge and willingness to display it in public. First, there is no FAR prohibiting the demonstration or practice of doing spins. Second, as anyone who has done a spin is aware, there is hardly any structural stress in a spin. In fact, once you get used to the fact that the earth seems to be rotating very fast in front of you it's all rather peaceful without any apparent extra G-forces save maybe a bit of leaning in your seat. The normal procedure is to work the controls until you have the plane in a spiral and then just fly out of it; there is very little structural stress involved unless you let yourself get too close to the ground before pulling out and find yourself yanking the yoke or joystick back too hard (a manouever that will not get you out of a spin and will just make things worse). -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:42:15 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: JohnT writes: What physical sensations are you referring to? All of them. Some people are very into strong sensations. Indeed. That goes without saying. Theme parks are full of them. You don't fly and you know nothing about flying. I have flown in airplanes many times. The sensations felt by pilots are identical to those felt by passengers. Except the pilots have to deal with it and aren't allowed to cower in their sets. Of course it goes without saying that there are a number of sensations that one can have when when piloting a plane smaller than a 707 that airline passengers rarely experience, and when they do it tends to be one of their last sensations. Since your actual flying experience consists of being a passenger on on large airliners it would serve you well to restrict your comments to that experience. By the way I've been a passenger on some smaller aircraft with maybe ten or eleven seats, and the sensations are quite a bit different than when a passenger on a 747. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:55:26 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: Hatunen writes: Good grief. That's an almost stupid thing to say. Not if you have an instrument rating. There are probably a few pilots who do things in the air for the thrill of it. They are among the most at risk for accidents. Well, duh. Usually, they are inexperienced (in part because they are more likely to kill themselves). However, there are idiots with experience, too--see Pinnacle Airlines flight 3701. But as the old pilots' saw goes, "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots." Yes. But there are many young and would-be bold pilots posting here. The kind who would buy a Cirrus if they could afford it. Your point being? Please make it relevant to the general subject and stop focusing your comments on a few fools. The occur in almost every field of human endeavor. But there are plenty of undesired sensations in flying even for cautious pilots. Yes--that's one of the drawbacks of flying for real vs. flying a sim. I hate having my ears pop, for example. If that's your only concern... As at this point usual you left out the meat of the comment you are referring to, where you said: There are lots of YouTube videos of inexperienced, stupid pilots doing just that. How many? Two? Four? A dozen? By my count, perhaps several hundred. YOU COUNTED SEVERAL HUNDRED YOU-TUBES SHOWING "inexperienced, stupid pilots"?? You must have a great deal of time on your hands. If those YouTube videos were like the video of the pilot demosntrating a spin that you cited in another post, I am hazarding a guess that even if you had seen that meny videos you wouldn't know a reckless maneouver from a non reckless one, making your opinion about worthless. How about posting maybe a dozen such URLs and we can see for ourselves what you consider "inexperienced, stupid pilots". (I'm not arguing that "inexperienced, stupid pilots" don't exist. I do hope you are at least clever enough to realize that.) Again you kleft out what you said that is crucial to understanding what follow: They don't always identify themselves, but eventually their names tend to appear in NTSB reports. You know this how? Are you psychic? I know this from studies that show a link between this type of behavior and accidents. Another duh. But what you haven't supported is your claim that most of the several hundred pilots you've seen in YouTube videos appear in NTSB reports. Given your apparent failure to know the difference between reckless and non-reckless flying I'm dubious. It's not limited to airplanes, either: exactly the same tendencies can be seen among automobile drivers. Another duh! Not a particularly apt comparison, though. In America, at least, drivers don't have ot pass much of a test to get licensed so some real idiots get on the roads. There's a lot more to getting a pilot's certification. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:16:01 -0700, Hatunen
wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:42:15 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: JohnT writes: What physical sensations are you referring to? All of them. Some people are very into strong sensations. Indeed. That goes without saying. Theme parks are full of them. You don't fly and you know nothing about flying. I have flown in airplanes many times. The sensations felt by pilots are identical to those felt by passengers. Except the pilots have to deal with it and aren't allowed to cower in their sets. Of course it goes without saying that there are a number of sensations that one can have when when piloting a plane smaller than a 707 that airline passengers rarely experience, and when they do it tends to be one of their last sensations. Since your actual flying experience consists of being a passenger on on large airliners it would serve you well to restrict your comments to that experience. By the way I've been a passenger on some smaller aircraft with maybe ten or eleven seats, and the sensations are quite a bit different than when a passenger on a 747. (More or less off-topic, but that's the reasoning I used to decide never again take take the fast boat between Tallinn and Helsinki, no matter how fast it is, in favor of the big Tallink ferries.) -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot nearly crashes in IMC, Controller helps | pimenthal | Piloting | 32 | September 27th 05 01:06 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Toronto Plane Pilot Was Allowed To Land In "Red Alert" Weather | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 24 | August 19th 05 10:48 PM |
2 pilot/small airplane CRM | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | September 1st 04 11:19 PM |
non-pilot lands airplane | Cub Driver | Piloting | 3 | August 14th 04 12:08 AM |
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies | pacplyer | Home Built | 11 | March 26th 04 12:39 AM |