A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aircraft patchwork?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 20th 09, 01:38 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default Aircraft patchwork?

Visited Manchester (EGCC) on Thursday 18th and the attached ATR42 landed.
I am just a little puzzled by the area at the front that looks like a large
patch, I tried a Google without success so does anyone know what is this
for?
I have seen similar areas on other ATR42 aircraft and it seems to be a
standard feature, it's just that it stands out on this one.

I will post some other shots taken that day when I have finished
sorting them out.

--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)




Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1714.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	135.7 KB
ID:	35967  
  #2  
Old June 20th 09, 01:55 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Bill & Ange
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default Aircraft patchwork?

Might be a former military version of the aircraft. From the pics I found,
the military versions had this 'hatch/patch' located here.


"Andrew B" wrote in message
om...
Visited Manchester (EGCC) on Thursday 18th and the attached ATR42 landed.
I am just a little puzzled by the area at the front that looks like a
large
patch, I tried a Google without success so does anyone know what is this
for?
I have seen similar areas on other ATR42 aircraft and it seems to be a
standard feature, it's just that it stands out on this one.

I will post some other shots taken that day when I have finished
sorting them out.

--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)




  #3  
Old June 20th 09, 01:55 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Bill & Ange
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default Aircraft patchwork?

Might be a former military version of the aircraft. From the pics I found,
the military versions had this 'hatch/patch' located here.


"Andrew B" wrote in message
om...
Visited Manchester (EGCC) on Thursday 18th and the attached ATR42 landed.
I am just a little puzzled by the area at the front that looks like a
large
patch, I tried a Google without success so does anyone know what is this
for?
I have seen similar areas on other ATR42 aircraft and it seems to be a
standard feature, it's just that it stands out on this one.

I will post some other shots taken that day when I have finished
sorting them out.

--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)




  #4  
Old June 20th 09, 02:31 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default Aircraft patchwork?

It appears that it was first registered with Finnair in 1986 and then Sasmat
Holdings, TAT, Cimber Air, TAT again, Air Liberte, Air Atlantique and then
had been stored by Aer Arann in December 2007 - I don't know when it
returned to service. I'm not sure there is any military history but you
could be correct.
--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)


"Bill & Ange" wrote in message
...
Might be a former military version of the aircraft. From the pics I found,
the military versions had this 'hatch/patch' located here.



  #5  
Old June 20th 09, 02:31 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default Aircraft patchwork?

It appears that it was first registered with Finnair in 1986 and then Sasmat
Holdings, TAT, Cimber Air, TAT again, Air Liberte, Air Atlantique and then
had been stored by Aer Arann in December 2007 - I don't know when it
returned to service. I'm not sure there is any military history but you
could be correct.
--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)


"Bill & Ange" wrote in message
...
Might be a former military version of the aircraft. From the pics I found,
the military versions had this 'hatch/patch' located here.



  #6  
Old June 20th 09, 02:36 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Aircraft patchwork?

"Andrew B" wrote

I have seen similar areas on other ATR42 aircraft and it seems to be a
standard feature, it's just that it stands out on this one.


It appears to be a "cargo loading" door that has been replaced and not
yet painted. See:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/CSA--...461524/L/&sid=
0330cae2681537c95687d78991642d2a

Makes sense.....FEDEX uses the ATR-42 for their package service.

Bob Moore
  #7  
Old June 20th 09, 02:36 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Aircraft patchwork?

"Andrew B" wrote

I have seen similar areas on other ATR42 aircraft and it seems to be a
standard feature, it's just that it stands out on this one.


It appears to be a "cargo loading" door that has been replaced and not
yet painted. See:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/CSA--...461524/L/&sid=
0330cae2681537c95687d78991642d2a

Makes sense.....FEDEX uses the ATR-42 for their package service.

Bob Moore
  #8  
Old June 20th 09, 02:58 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Netko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 738
Default Aircraft patchwork? - atr42-300.jpg (1/1) [73K]

On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:38:22 +0100, Andrew B wrote
(in article ) :

I am just a little puzzled by the area at the front that looks like a large
patch, I tried a Google without success so does anyone know what is this
for?


Isn't it the cargo door, as in the attached 3-view drawing (filched
shamelessly from the ATR web site)? It hinges upwards (the door, that is).

It's depicted open in Flight's cutaway drawing at:

http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...laviation1949-
2006cutaways/aerospatiale-atr42-cutaway-6662.aspx

What a long URL.


Attached Images
 
  #9  
Old June 20th 09, 03:11 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default Aircraft patchwork? - atr42-300.jpg (1/1) [73K]


"Netko" wrote in message
x.com...
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:38:22 +0100, Andrew B wrote
(in article ) :

Isn't it the cargo door, as in the attached 3-view drawing (filched
shamelessly from the ATR web site)? It hinges upwards (the door, that
is).

It's depicted open in Flight's cutaway drawing at:

http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...laviation1949-
2006cutaways/aerospatiale-atr42-cutaway-6662.aspx

What a long URL.


Thank you Netko, that explains it, I hadn't thought of a cargo hold ahead of
the passenger cabin.

--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)



  #10  
Old June 20th 09, 03:11 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default Aircraft patchwork? - atr42-300.jpg (1/1) [73K]


"Netko" wrote in message
x.com...
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:38:22 +0100, Andrew B wrote
(in article ) :

Isn't it the cargo door, as in the attached 3-view drawing (filched
shamelessly from the ATR web site)? It hinges upwards (the door, that
is).

It's depicted open in Flight's cutaway drawing at:

http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...laviation1949-
2006cutaways/aerospatiale-atr42-cutaway-6662.aspx

What a long URL.


Thank you Netko, that explains it, I hadn't thought of a cargo hold ahead of
the passenger cabin.

--
Andrew B (Cheshire, England)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
(Lord Kelvin, president Royal Society, 1895.)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
aircraft brakes were never designed for stopping aircraft. Stealth Pilot[_2_] Home Built 52 November 11th 08 05:09 AM
Delaware LLC Owned Aircraft California Based Aircraft ChrisEllis Piloting 6 January 17th 06 03:47 AM
Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? Marc J. Zeitlin Piloting 22 November 24th 05 04:11 AM
Experience transitioning from C-172 to complex aircraft as potential first owned aircraft? Jack Allison Owning 12 June 14th 04 08:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.