A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glider power systems



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 6th 04, 01:27 AM
Mike Borgelt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:11:39 GMT, "Bill Daniels"
wrote:

After reading the annual installment of the 12V vs.14V soap opera and the
"We can't power any more electronics" whine, I took a little time to read
the Maxwell Electronics information on their Ultracaps.

See: http://www.maxwell.com/index.html

Maxwell makes a pretty good case for combining a small ultracapcitor with a
NiMH or Lithium-ion battery for use in typical consumer electronics like
computers and cellphones. It seems to me that the devices in our gliders
could use the Maxwell approach. Transmitters place a high demand on the
batteries for short periods and the varios and flight computers place a low
demand for long hours.

The Sealed Lead Acid batteries most of us use are great for short, heavy
amperage demands but not so hot for powering electronics for long hours.
The typical NiMH or increasingly common lithium-Ion are great for low
current devices but not good at high current demands. Maxwell's solution is
to combine a low amperage power source with an Ultracap so the Ultracap
handles the high-current short-duration, demands like transmitters and the
main lithium-ion battery handles the low-current, long-duration demand.

Of course, you still need the same AH's to go the distance but your
transmitter will get the voltage it needs at the end of a long day. We need
our EE's to quit arguing about 14V vs. 12V and whip up a nice circuit for an
Ultracap + Lithium-ion battery.

Bill Daniels



Do we really have a problem that requires this if we use 2 x 7 A-h
sealed lead acid batteries? I use one routinely, keep the other
charged and when #1 dies, switch to # 2 which doesn't have any
charge/discharge cycles on it (you might like to do one to confirm it
is a good battery). After the flight put #2 in the #1 position and put
a new battery in #2.

Automatic chargers for lead acid are cheap and available. Li-ion
batteries are *very* fussy about charging and can be dangerous if this
is done incorrectly.

In many respects our power requirements are lower nowadays. We aren't
running old 360 channel radios full of TTL logic that drew up to 800mA
on standby receive.

Modern radios have standby receive currents of 25 to 100mA.
A B50 vario draws about 100mA
A B40 18mA until you turn the volume up.
GPS receivers are now available that will draw as little as 30Ma from
a 12 volt source.
Our B2000 glide computer draws 50mA.

Allow about 300mA for continuous load and the 7 A-h battery has plenty
of capacity for the whole day even allowing for some reduction with
age and receive/transmit loads.

Add a transponder and you get about another 400mA continuous.

Still likely OK for normal use and you have the other battery at the
end of the day.

What you should do is actually measure what your systems consume. You
may get a surprise.

Also check that you aren't losing volts between the battery and the
systems. Measure the voltage at the battery and at the system. You may
have some unwanted resistance in the circuit.

Use good mil- spec aircraft wire to do your installation. Put a fuse
right on the battery terminal.

We may get a reduction of a few pounds of weight by going to Li
batteries and supercaps and /or some increase in capacity. The
question becomes - how much do you want to pay for this?

Mike Borgelt
  #2  
Old May 6th 04, 03:31 AM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Borgelt" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:11:39 GMT, "Bill Daniels"
wrote:

After reading the annual installment of the 12V vs.14V soap opera and the
"We can't power any more electronics" whine, I took a little time to read
the Maxwell Electronics information on their Ultracaps.

See: http://www.maxwell.com/index.html

Maxwell makes a pretty good case for combining a small ultracapcitor with

a
NiMH or Lithium-ion battery for use in typical consumer electronics like
computers and cellphones. It seems to me that the devices in our gliders
could use the Maxwell approach. Transmitters place a high demand on the
batteries for short periods and the varios and flight computers place a

low
demand for long hours.

The Sealed Lead Acid batteries most of us use are great for short, heavy
amperage demands but not so hot for powering electronics for long hours.
The typical NiMH or increasingly common lithium-Ion are great for low
current devices but not good at high current demands. Maxwell's solution

is
to combine a low amperage power source with an Ultracap so the Ultracap
handles the high-current short-duration, demands like transmitters and

the
main lithium-ion battery handles the low-current, long-duration demand.

Of course, you still need the same AH's to go the distance but your
transmitter will get the voltage it needs at the end of a long day. We

need
our EE's to quit arguing about 14V vs. 12V and whip up a nice circuit for

an
Ultracap + Lithium-ion battery.

Bill Daniels



Do we really have a problem that requires this if we use 2 x 7 A-h
sealed lead acid batteries? I use one routinely, keep the other
charged and when #1 dies, switch to # 2 which doesn't have any
charge/discharge cycles on it (you might like to do one to confirm it
is a good battery). After the flight put #2 in the #1 position and put
a new battery in #2.

Automatic chargers for lead acid are cheap and available. Li-ion
batteries are *very* fussy about charging and can be dangerous if this
is done incorrectly.

In many respects our power requirements are lower nowadays. We aren't
running old 360 channel radios full of TTL logic that drew up to 800mA
on standby receive.

Modern radios have standby receive currents of 25 to 100mA.
A B50 vario draws about 100mA
A B40 18mA until you turn the volume up.
GPS receivers are now available that will draw as little as 30Ma from
a 12 volt source.
Our B2000 glide computer draws 50mA.

Allow about 300mA for continuous load and the 7 A-h battery has plenty
of capacity for the whole day even allowing for some reduction with
age and receive/transmit loads.

Add a transponder and you get about another 400mA continuous.

Still likely OK for normal use and you have the other battery at the
end of the day.

What you should do is actually measure what your systems consume. You
may get a surprise.

Also check that you aren't losing volts between the battery and the
systems. Measure the voltage at the battery and at the system. You may
have some unwanted resistance in the circuit.

Use good mil- spec aircraft wire to do your installation. Put a fuse
right on the battery terminal.

We may get a reduction of a few pounds of weight by going to Li
batteries and supercaps and /or some increase in capacity. The
question becomes - how much do you want to pay for this?

Mike Borgelt


With what's in my glider now, one 7.5AH 12V SLA is good enough. I was just
answering the question, "Are we running out of power to run all these
electronic gadgets". The answer is no, there are plenty of options for the
future even if that future means full glass cockpits, transponders and
situational awareness aids.

Better battery options are available now and they will get better in the
future. As you point out, Mike, electronics makers are constantly lowering
power demand. Taken together, the two trends insure that we can add a lot
of avionics if we choose to.

Your point about wiring is very true. We tend to put the batteries behind
the pilot and the electronics forward. A much lighter battery could go
right in the panel without affecting the CG much and the wiring runs would
be much shorter.

I have a friend who mixes his metaphors. He says that lead batteries in
gliders makes as much sense as an air-cooled submarine.

Bill Daniels

  #3  
Old May 6th 04, 07:26 PM
kotka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I saw a small fuel cell system (2 lbs and about the size
of a beer can) designed to power a Pro Video camera.
The kind that you normally see used in remote news
trucks. I don't remember the specs that they were
quoting but it was much better than the normal batteries.
Not that I would want to fly with a fuel cell yet but they
are working on it.....
Rob


  #4  
Old May 6th 04, 10:53 PM
Mike Borgelt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 06 May 2004 02:31:35 GMT, "Bill Daniels"
wrote:


I have a friend who mixes his metaphors. He says that lead batteries in
gliders makes as much sense as an air-cooled submarine.

Bill Daniels



Ever noticed the strange looks you get from power pilots or members of
the public when you tell them your glider carries hundreds of pounds
or water?

The safety stuff about lithium batteries looks interesting doesn't it?

Mike


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are you gliding when you touch down? John Doe Piloting 29 January 23rd 05 12:52 AM
Funny story about piloting [email protected] Piloting 0 December 20th 04 12:34 AM
Power management on a O-300 Victor Piloting 0 July 9th 04 01:09 AM
I wish I'd never got into this... Kevin Neave Soaring 32 September 19th 03 12:18 PM
Aircraft engine certification FAR's Corky Scott Home Built 4 July 25th 03 06:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.