A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Drugs in the Cockpit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:46 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002


Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a limb and
sawed it off.


What part of the article states that? They report only what the Air Force
and ABC News have stated. They take no position. Pretty fair reporting I'd
say.




  #12  
Old April 3rd 04, 03:40 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002


Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a limb

and
sawed it off.


What part of the article states that? They report only what the Air Force
and ABC News have stated. They take no position. Pretty fair reporting I'd
say.


And all that they stated was that the pilot had taken one of the pills an
hour before the flight. He might have taken a dump, too. Where does the Air
Force say that this caused the accident?


  #13  
Old April 4th 04, 02:39 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002

Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a limb

and
sawed it off.


What part of the article states that? They report only what the Air

Force
and ABC News have stated. They take no position. Pretty fair reporting

I'd
say.


And all that they stated was that the pilot had taken one of the pills an
hour before the flight. He might have taken a dump, too. Where does the

Air
Force say that this caused the accident?


No on in the issue says it CAUSED the accident; they're questioning whether
it CONTRIBUTED to the accident.


  #14  
Old April 4th 04, 06:00 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in

message
...
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002

Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused

the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a

limb
and
sawed it off.

What part of the article states that? They report only what the Air

Force
and ABC News have stated. They take no position. Pretty fair reporting

I'd
say.


And all that they stated was that the pilot had taken one of the pills

an
hour before the flight. He might have taken a dump, too. Where does the

Air
Force say that this caused the accident?


No on in the issue says it CAUSED the accident; they're questioning

whether
it CONTRIBUTED to the accident.


The article provides no evidence that the pills even contributed to the
accident.


  #15  
Old April 4th 04, 04:00 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in

message
...

http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002

Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused

the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a

limb
and
sawed it off.

What part of the article states that? They report only what the Air

Force
and ABC News have stated. They take no position. Pretty fair

reporting
I'd
say.

And all that they stated was that the pilot had taken one of the pills

an
hour before the flight. He might have taken a dump, too. Where does

the
Air
Force say that this caused the accident?


No on in the issue says it CAUSED the accident; they're questioning

whether
it CONTRIBUTED to the accident.


The article provides no evidence that the pills even contributed to the
accident.


The article (it's not even an "article", just a "blurb") isn't doing an
analysis, only reporting the Air Force and ABC News reports. Sort of a
"heads up" in conjunction with the Alzheimer's drugs.

Quite trying to read into it something that isn't there.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
backup cockpit lighting Josef Burger Instrument Flight Rules 35 January 2nd 05 01:23 AM
Antonov vs Galaxy cockpit Emilio Military Aviation 13 July 2nd 04 06:15 AM
Fake Cockpit Flubke Military Aviation 6 June 16th 04 03:16 PM
What are you guys using for cockpit lights these days? Stealth Pilot Home Built 6 December 9th 03 09:14 AM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.