A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Best Glide Speed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 4th 04, 01:32 AM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Best Glide Speed

Does Best Glide Speed reduce with weight the same as other airspeeds?

  #2  
Old September 4th 04, 02:02 AM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Best glide speed is a determined by the interection of the parasitic drag
curve and the induced drag curve. Parasitic drag is not going to be affected
by weight but induced drag is somewhat affected by weight as well as the
location of the CG. So, yes, it *could* reduce or increase slightly depending
on the CG.

john smith wrote:
Does Best Glide Speed reduce with weight the same as other airspeeds?


  #3  
Old September 4th 04, 03:02 AM
Raymond Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, weight does have an impact on best glide speed. That is why glider
pilots in competition (or whenever they need a high speed, like long
flights limited by daylight) carry water ballast in the wing tanks. It
doesn't affect the glide angle too much, but it does have an impact at
which airspeed that best glide angle occurs.

Go check out a glider contest sometime.

I recall crewing for one once, and fondly remember the view, as the
afternoon wore on, of the gliders returning to the airport from the
direction of the setting sun. We could first see them at about 15 miles
distance as bright points where the sun was reflecting off the white gel
coat. As they got closer we could make out the glider shape. Then about 5
miles out the sun started refracting through the "contrails" of water
ballast being dumped as they approached the finish line.

That particular contest had 6 gliders crossing the finish line at 100
knots within 2 minutes of each other.

Ray Swartz


john smith wrote:

Does Best Glide Speed reduce with weight the same as other airspeeds?

  #4  
Old September 4th 04, 03:22 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



john smith wrote:

Does Best Glide Speed reduce with weight the same as other airspeeds?


Yes.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.
  #5  
Old September 4th 04, 05:03 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Raymond Swartz" wrote in message
...
Yes, weight does have an impact on best glide speed. That is why glider
pilots in competition (or whenever they need a high speed, like long
flights limited by daylight) carry water ballast in the wing tanks. It
doesn't affect the glide angle too much


It doesn't affect the glide angle at all, oddly enough. The lift/drag ratio
remains the same, which results in the same glide ratio. You just have more
lift and more drag.


  #6  
Old September 4th 04, 10:04 AM
Julian Scarfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Raymond Swartz" wrote in message
...
Yes, weight does have an impact on best glide speed. That is why glider
pilots in competition (or whenever they need a high speed, like long
flights limited by daylight) carry water ballast in the wing tanks. It
doesn't affect the glide angle too much


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
It doesn't affect the glide angle at all, oddly enough. The lift/drag

ratio
remains the same, which results in the same glide ratio. You just have

more
lift and more drag.


It does affect the glide angle a little.

The model that infers that glide angle is independent of weight assumes a
parasitic drag coefficient that is independent of speed. In reality it's
not. Skin friction drag coefficient reduces as speed to the power 0.2 for
turbulent boundary layers and speed to the 0.5 for laminar boundary layers.
Thus the faster (heavier) glider actually has a higher L/D.

Thus at 20% higher weight, 10% higher glide speed, the skin friction
(approximately a quarter to a half of the drag) is between 2 and 5% lower.
So the glide ratio will be something like 0.5 to 2.5% better.

Is it significant? Well, maybe. Bear in mind that we're always taught to
nail that best glide speed. Getting the airspeed wrong by 5% costs you
just 0.5% of your glide angle, and getting it wrong by 10% costs you just 2%
of your glide angle. So the numbers are the same sorts of magnitude.

Julian Scarfe


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Instrument Flight Rules 70 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Owning 69 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions Koopas Ly Piloting 16 November 29th 03 10:01 PM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.