If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
I’ve got two questions for European pilots regarding the Form One,
arising out of curiosity on my part. First, it appears to this US pilot that one of the uses of a Form One is to certify that a new part is airworthy, with the basis for airworthiness being that the part was made in accordance with a TSO or some other approved technical specification. Is this correct? Second, why would a plane made in Europe not have a Form One for all installed equipment? Isn’t it necessary to certify that all of a new aircraft’s equipment is airworthy? I ask because my LS8-18 (made in 2000) has Form Ones for the 4-point harness, nose hook, CG hook, main wheel hub and brake, airspeed, altimeter, VHF radio, ELT and transponder antenna. No Form Ones at all were supplied for the transponder, encoder, SN10, Sage vario or VHF antenna. It isn’t a matter of loss, because I have all of the Form Ones listed on the original LS document transmittal letter. -John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
Well John..... usually Europe is far ahead of US in most respects, but
you have just discovered one area where we are way behind you yanks...... our governments just love "bureaucrazy"! Robert ASW 28-18E jcarlyle skrev: I’ve got two questions for European pilots regarding the Form One, arising out of curiosity on my part. First, it appears to this US pilot that one of the uses of a Form One is to certify that a new part is airworthy, with the basis for airworthiness being that the part was made in accordance with a TSO or some other approved technical specification. Is this correct? Second, why would a plane made in Europe not have a Form One for all installed equipment? Isn’t it necessary to certify that all of a new aircraft’s equipment is airworthy? I ask because my LS8-18 (made in 2000) has Form Ones for the 4-point harness, nose hook, CG hook, main wheel hub and brake, airspeed, altimeter, VHF radio, ELT and transponder antenna. No Form Ones at all were supplied for the transponder, encoder, SN10, Sage vario or VHF antenna. It isn’t a matter of loss, because I have all of the Form Ones listed on the original LS document transmittal letter. -John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
jcarlyle wrote:
First, it appears to this US pilot that one of the uses of a Form One is to certify that a new part is airworthy, with the basis for airworthiness being that the part was made in accordance with a TSO or some other approved technical specification. Is this correct? Roughly said, yes. EASA Form 1 ist the exact equivalent of the FAA Form 8130–3, it even has the same blocks. (And EASA honors FAA 8130-3 forms.) Second, why would a plane made in Europe not have a Form One for all installed equipment? Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment. I'm not sure how transponders, radios and ELTs are handled because they are not required but must be approved somehow. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
I have a Form One for both my radio and transponder.
/Robert John Smith skrev: jcarlyle wrote: First, it appears to this US pilot that one of the uses of a Form One is to certify that a new part is airworthy, with the basis for airworthiness being that the part was made in accordance with a TSO or some other approved technical specification. Is this correct? Roughly said, yes. EASA Form 1 ist the exact equivalent of the FAA Form 8130–3, it even has the same blocks. (And EASA honors FAA 8130-3 forms.) Second, why would a plane made in Europe not have a Form One for all installed equipment? Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment. I'm not sure how transponders, radios and ELTs are handled because they are not required but must be approved somehow. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
Who determines "required equipment" for Form One? I've got Form Ones
for things that aren't on either the Minimum Equipment List or the Master Equipment List, while I'm missing Form Ones for things that ARE on the Minimum Equipment List! Seems very haphazard - maybe it is a "bureaucrazy"... -John On Nov 26, 3:45 pm, John Smith wrote: Roughly said, yes. EASA Form 1 ist the exact equivalent of the FAA Form 8130–3, it even has the same blocks. (And EASA honors FAA 8130-3 forms.) Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment. I'm not sure how transponders, radios and ELTs are handled because they are not required but must be approved somehow. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
jcarlyle wrote:
Who determines "required equipment" for Form One? I've got Form Ones for things that aren't on either the Minimum Equipment List or the Master Equipment List, while I'm missing Form Ones for things that ARE on the Minimum Equipment List! Seems very haphazard - maybe it is a "bureaucrazy"... You can have your wrist watch TSOed if you wish and pay for it, but it isn't required. On the other hand, even TSOed instruments don't nessecairily come with a Form 1. They most probably will today, but Form 1 is just a standardized format for describing to which TSO a given aircraft part conforms, but you can ask the manufactorer to confirm this in handwriting on the back of a used envelope if you prefer this. This won't make anybody's life easier, though. And don't forget that Form 1 didn't even exist a couple of years ago, so the TSO certification of older instrument will most probably have some random format unless they have been overhauled recently. On yet another hand, you can even fill out a Form 1 also for non-TSOed parts, if you like. Just leave block 13 empty or fill in: not TSOed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
Appreciate the additional information, but you sidestepped the
question. You said earlier "Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment." I said earlier "I'm missing Form Ones for things that are on the Minimum Equipment List!" The MEL defines required equipment, doesn't it? If not, what IS the definition of "required equipment" used to trigger the use of a Form One? -John On Nov 27, 8:35 am, John Smith wrote: You can have your wrist watch TSOed if you wish and pay for it, but it isn't required. On the other hand, even TSOed instruments don't nessecairily come with a Form 1. They most probably will today, but Form 1 is just a standardized format for describing to which TSO a given aircraft part conforms, but you can ask the manufactorer to confirm this in handwriting on the back of a used envelope if you prefer this. This won't make anybody's life easier, though. And don't forget that Form 1 didn't even exist a couple of years ago, so the TSO certification of older instrument will most probably have some random format unless they have been overhauled recently. On yet another hand, you can even fill out a Form 1 also for non-TSOed parts, if you like. Just leave block 13 empty or fill in: not TSOed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
jcarlyle wrote:
The MEL defines required equipment, doesn't it? Yes, of course. But frankly, I'm no aviation attorney and even if I were I couldn't comment on a glider I have never seen. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
I'm not seeking legal opinions, just understanding. My glider has an
Experimental airworthiness and Form Ones are useless to me. I'm just trying to understand why LS didn't provide Form Ones for items that appear to be required, and did provide Form Ones for things that appear not to be required. -John On Nov 27, 10:07 am, John Smith wrote: jcarlyle wrote: The MEL defines required equipment, doesn't it? Yes, of course. But frankly, I'm no aviation attorney and even if I were I couldn't comment on a glider I have never seen. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Form One Questions
Look at your own aircraft TCDS (type certificate data sheet) and what is
listed as "required equipment" if is says there an altimeter, then it needs an altimeter.if it says an altimeter model # ---- or equivilent meeting TSO ---- or ESA ---- ect then you have to have one that meets or exceeds this standard of certifcation.... if it's not in the "required" instrument list then it isn't needed to meet the TCDS... there are really NO flight computers or electric variometers that ahve any certifications...nearly all Winter Mechanical instruments including variometers have ESA form one type approvals.few if any others do...PZL's had some national certifcations but at the time they were most common this was not recognised outside the old eastern block..today they might (not sure, we really don't see many new PZL's) same for many others...obviously PDA's, ClearNav's ect have no approval certificates at all but you will find them common in gliders...they are simply "not required" by TCDS...this however does not mean that just anyone can install them in any way they want.the installations still have to be performed in such a way as outlined in AC4313.....log entries, Wt/Bal ect still has to be performed, aircraft type hardware, cables ect also should meet AC4313 ect. you'll get unfortunately different answers from mechanics and even (especially) the FAA inspectors themselves....so it does tend to remain "grey" and subject to the that one paricular official's interpetation. tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... Who determines "required equipment" for Form One? I've got Form Ones for things that aren't on either the Minimum Equipment List or the Master Equipment List, while I'm missing Form Ones for things that ARE on the Minimum Equipment List! Seems very haphazard - maybe it is a "bureaucrazy"... -John On Nov 26, 3:45 pm, John Smith wrote: Roughly said, yes. EASA Form 1 ist the exact equivalent of the FAA Form 8130–3, it even has the same blocks. (And EASA honors FAA 8130-3 forms.) Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment. I'm not sure how transponders, radios and ELTs are handled because they are not required but must be approved somehow. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force Form 181? | Yossarian | Piloting | 7 | April 16th 05 06:00 AM |
Request for a 337 form | MC | Soaring | 12 | March 11th 05 03:56 AM |
FAA form 337? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 15 | February 1st 04 07:17 PM |
Mylar "form 1" vs "form 2" | John | Soaring | 1 | November 27th 03 01:20 AM |
Mig-29 questions & general aviation questions 2003 | Steven | Military Aviation | 1 | October 20th 03 06:06 AM |