If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What has NASA done for you?
*NASA or NAACP? *
There is controversy as to whether or not space exploration is worthy of federal (tax payer) funding. Space exploration has helped to create many medical advances among other more common household products that we take for granted. Project Mercury http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/history/mercury/mercury.htm began in 1958 and helped to develop blood pressure testers in order to make sure that man's first orbit remained safe to his health. Scratch proof eyeglass lenses were originally the glass coating for satellites to protect them from floating space particles. Nitinol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitinol, the shape memory alloy, helps to adhere braces to teeth. And we should not forget all of the things telemetry has done for us; such as, allowing automatic monitoring for alarm systems, oil rigs, chemical plants, cell phones, cameras, remote radio broadcasts, and global positioning systems. When most people wake up in the morning they will make something for breakfast, pack a lunch, check their email and grab their Ipod, cell phone or palm pilot. When they leave for work or school they will close the garage door, pop in a CD and even look up maps on a screen in their dash. All of this happens before even entering the technologically enhanced office or school, thanks to NASA. Yet some people have the gall to not appreciate NASA and ask, "What has NASA done for me?" Well, the Tempur-Pedic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPUR bed you woke up on, the Tephlon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teflon coated pan you scrambled your eggs in and the microwave you reheated your coffee in are direct results from products invented by NASA. DuPont http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/index.jsp?page=/content/US/en_US/news/product/2005/pn07_11_05a.html makes many of our daily used household products such as Ziploc bags, refrigerants, oven mitts, bake ware, inhalers, and toothbrushes to name very few of their products that were either derived from or used within the space exploration programs. Even Velcro was first used in the space shuttle and may be used to help save the current space expedition http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050803/NASA03/TPScience/. Without NASA your cable would not come in digital or satellite nor would you be able to check the weather across the country. Your email would never work and your cell phone would be pointless. The remote would not lower your garage door, your CD would not hold more than a song or two and your advanced never-get-lost system would never have been created. Your sandwich would be stale by lunchtime, your soda would be in a cup and your insulated http://www.specprom.com/images/sm195/lnhsak.jpg lunch bag would be brown and paper. We haven't even gotten through the day and I think I have made my point. What has NASA done for you? Must you really ask? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Interenting commentary, but please check
http://www.ideafinder.com/history/in...s/story068.htm. The microwave oven did not come about because of NASA. Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI BobGoFish wrote: *NASA or NAACP? * There is controversy as to whether or not space exploration is worthy of federal (tax payer) funding. Space exploration has helped to create many medical advances among other more common household products that we take for granted. Project Mercury http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/history/mercury/mercury.htm began in 1958 and helped to develop blood pressure testers in order to make sure that man's first orbit remained safe to his health. Scratch proof eyeglass lenses were originally the glass coating for satellites to protect them from floating space particles. Nitinol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitinol, the shape memory alloy, helps to adhere braces to teeth. And we should not forget all of the things telemetry has done for us; such as, allowing automatic monitoring for alarm systems, oil rigs, chemical plants, cell phones, cameras, remote radio broadcasts, and global positioning systems. When most people wake up in the morning they will make something for breakfast, pack a lunch, check their email and grab their Ipod, cell phone or palm pilot. When they leave for work or school they will close the garage door, pop in a CD and even look up maps on a screen in their dash. All of this happens before even entering the technologically enhanced office or school, thanks to NASA. Yet some people have the gall to not appreciate NASA and ask, "What has NASA done for me?" Well, the Tempur-Pedic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPUR bed you woke up on, the Tephlon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teflon coated pan you scrambled your eggs in and the microwave you reheated your coffee in are direct results from products invented by NASA. DuPont http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/index.jsp?page=/content/US/en_US/news/product/2005/pn07_11_05a.html makes many of our daily used household products such as Ziploc bags, refrigerants, oven mitts, bake ware, inhalers, and toothbrushes to name very few of their products that were either derived from or used within the space exploration programs. Even Velcro was first used in the space shuttle and may be used to help save the current space expedition http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050803/NASA03/TPScience/. Without NASA your cable would not come in digital or satellite nor would you be able to check the weather across the country. Your email would never work and your cell phone would be pointless. The remote would not lower your garage door, your CD would not hold more than a song or two and your advanced never-get-lost system would never have been created. Your sandwich would be stale by lunchtime, your soda would be in a cup and your insulated http://www.specprom.com/images/sm195/lnhsak.jpg lunch bag would be brown and paper. We haven't even gotten through the day and I think I have made my point. What has NASA done for you? Must you really ask? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
BobGoFish wrote: *NASA or NAACP? * There is controversy as to whether or not space exploration is worthy of federal (tax payer) funding. That is true, but there is considerably more controversy over whether *manned* space exploration is worthy of taxpayer funding, and more controversy still over whether taxpayers ought to continue to fund NASA. These are three distinct questions, and ought not to be conflated. [ List of cool things NASA has supposedly done snipped ] FIrst, the attribution of some of the technologies in this list (like email) to NASA is highly questionable. But more importantly, it is not at all clear that these technological advances would not have happened without NASA. And in recent years one could seriously ask what advances we might have had if, for example, the space shuttle and space station programs had not been sucking tens of billions of dollars into the cosmic void with absolutely nothing to show for it. (Note that nearly all of the technologies on the list of Cool Things NASA Has Done are over twenty years old.) NASA is, by and large, not about space exploration, it's about funneling money to key Congressional districts and (recently) saving face in the international community. The vast majority of NASA's budget goes to shuttle and ISS, neither of which has ever "explored" anything except the limits of the American public's tolerance for boondoggles. (It has yet to find them.) I support space exploration. I think the American public really gets its money's worth from NASA's unmanned missions. And when Virgin Spaceways starts selling tickets I'll be there with my checkbook. But NASA's manned program (which is the vast majority of NASA) is nothing but a great money-consuming black hole. It ought to be scrapped. rg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
BobGoFish wrote: There is controversy as to whether or not space exploration is worthy of federal (tax payer) funding. The more specific questions on which more and more people have (fortunately) been focusing a 1) Have NASA's post-Apollo _manned_ space flight programs delivered value for money for taxpayers' investment? Answer is NO. 2) Has the entire shuttle program been (in retrospect) worth what taxpayer's have spent on it? Has the shuttle program delivered even a small fraction of NASA promised it would deliver? Has it delivered ANY major or important scientific discoveries or technical advances, that could not have been achieved better and much more economically with an unmanned space program (or even in some instances just back here on the ground)? Answer to all of these is NO. 3) Given the laws of physics, the currently available level of space technology, and any foreseeable near-term advances in that technology, does it make any sense to spend equally large amounts of taxpayer money attempting to send astronauts to the moon or -- God save us all! -- to Mars, rather than focusing on further advances in unmanned space technology? Answer is, it makes NO sense at all. 4) Should the Space Station at this point be abandoned and left to rust? As the current shuttle mission shows all so vividly, for God's sake, YES. None of the above is intended in any way (a) to disparage the Apollo program's accomplishments, which were pretty surely worth doing in their time; or (b) to disparage or discourage bold and innovative Burt Rutan style private efforts, which just might come up with something new and unexpected (though it's very unlikely to be Man on Mars, or anything approaching that). Fortunately, NASA has recently floated some scale drawings of initial conceptions for what their future manned and unmanned launch vehicles might look like, alongside a scale drawing of the shuttle. Given that this is a pilots' news group, I suspect the reality of those drawings may begin to sink in. The unmanned vehicle is huge; the manned vehicle is right back to 1960's era "spam in a can" methodology: shoot 'em up, let 'em maneuver the little capsule uselessly around for a little while, and parachute 'em back down. I think the glamour will go off that real fast. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hey! NASA invented Tang - now that's 'real'!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary G" wrote in message ... Hey! NASA invented Tang - now that's 'real'! Or was Tang invented for NASA? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm . . .well, did NASA have to exist to invent Tang (or
its equivalent)? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget they invented the Internet too...
NASA defines boondoggle. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
BobGoFish wrote:
There is controversy as to whether or not space exploration is worthy of federal (tax payer) funding.... As taxpayers, we should always hold government accountable for our money. NASA has indeed contributed much to our nation's knowledge base. But NASA is a vestigal organ of the cold war. Its raison d'etre was to counter the Soviet threat. So the purpose for which it was created has passed, and it has become a living example of "bureaucratic creep". There now needs to be a reorganization of some sort in favor of a smaller, less bureaucratic national space effort (if such a thing is even possible), and along with it a hard look at modern national priorities. I feel much work could be privatized, and public endowments or prizes established for technological challenges - as was accomplished by the Rutan effort. There will remain some work that only public funding can accomplish, to be sure, but taxpayers should always demand accountability from their government. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Having looked again at the list of claimed NASA "accomplishments" that
started this thread, I'm now trying to decide if it was intended to be taken seriously, or tongue in cheek. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
NASA chokes again | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | May 2nd 05 01:43 AM |
Participated in my first NASA GA research project (long) | Peter R. | Piloting | 22 | October 22nd 04 05:59 PM |
NASA Research looking for pilots with WSI in-flight weather experience | Peter R. | Piloting | 3 | October 20th 04 02:23 AM |
NASA Jet Might Have Hit Record 5,000 Mph | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 28th 04 04:03 PM |