If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what the heck is lift?
I have always been under the impression that lift is the product of
airspeed and angle of attack, and that lift is the measure of upward force acting on the plane at a given time. For instance, if you are doing slow flight, your wings are producing the same amount of life that you would be if you were cruising, GIVEN that you did not lose or gain any altitude during the maneuver. My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. I overheard a ATP guy who flies King Air's say that this huge 20 ton military plane he used to fly would fly approaches at 110 knots, and I heard him say "It is able to do this because it producing so much lift", which I took as him defining lift as my instructor does. So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"buttman" wrote in message
ups.com... [...] So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? Your instructor is wrong, and should not be instructing. In straight and level flight, lift equals weight. Unless your weight changes, lift does not change, regardless of airspeed. What *can* change is the lift coefficient, which is determined by the angle of attack. But lift itself remains static. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
buttman wrote:
I have always been under the impression that lift is the product of airspeed and angle of attack, and that lift is the measure of upward force acting on the plane at a given time. For instance, if you are doing slow flight, your wings are producing the same amount of life that you would be if you were cruising, GIVEN that you did not lose or gain any altitude during the maneuver. My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. I overheard a ATP guy who flies King Air's say that this huge 20 ton military plane he used to fly would fly approaches at 110 knots, and I heard him say "It is able to do this because it producing so much lift", which I took as him defining lift as my instructor does. So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? Good question, In its most basic form, the amount of lift is determined by how many air molecules are being deflected by the lifting surfaces, what angle they are being deflected at, and how fast they are being deflected. We can mostly ignore the low pressure over the wing stuff, since that is, a. relatively minor, and b. is also a product of how many molecules are flowing over the wing and how fast they are flowing. Obviously, the faster the wing, or rotor, is moving through the air, the more molecules it will be encountering and accelerating downward in a given period of time. It is also obvious that the greater the AOA, the steeper the angle of deflection and the greater the number of molecules being deflected. Therefore lift is a product of the airspeed of the lifting surface and it's angle of attack. Drag is another issue altogether. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lift in a fully developed spin or steady sinking mush is also exactly
the same as in level flight. -- Roger Long |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lift is created by the differing pressures between the upper and lower
surfaces of the wing coupled together with AOA. Wings generally tend to have a curved suface. The upper surface has a greater arc or curvature than the lower surface. As the air flows across the surfaces of the wing, the upper surface air is forced to move faster than the lower surface air thus causing a pressure difference between the two surfaces. The pressure difference coupled together AOA is what causes lift. On the question of wether the wing is 'pushed' or 'sucked' into the air, as far as I am aware the jury is still out on that point. Personally I subscribe to the view that it's probably a bit of both. As for air density, that is another point. as you will be aware that air desity decreases with altitude i.e the higher you go the molecules are less densly packed which is why any wing has a maximum service ceiling, i.e the point at which it won't generate any more lift. It's also worth noting that VNE decreases with altitude. Glider pilot. -|- -----===()===----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gone,
Lift is created by the differing pressures between the upper and lower surfaces of the wing coupled together with AOA. I'd say it's the other way around: Lift creates the pressure differential. Wings generally tend to have a curved suface. The upper surface has a greater arc or curvature than the lower surface. As the air flows across the surfaces of the wing, the upper surface air is forced to move faster than the lower surface air thus causing a pressure difference between the two surfaces. Forced by what? And how does your "theory" explain inverted flight? I don't buy it. BTW, this has been beaten to death in countless aviation newsgroup discussions. I once thought like you, because I was taught that way. It's still a bad theory. I suggest googling. Keywords might be: lift, flight, Bernoulli, Newton. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
buttman wrote:
He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. So, if follows that if I stand my airplane on its tail, sitting on the ground with an airspeed of zero, it's producing the maximum amount of lift possible. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:12:36 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: Lift in a fully developed spin or steady sinking mush is also exactly the same as in level flight. Hmm. If lift was equal to weight in level flight the forces are equal, thus no change in height. How do you reconcile this with a mush or spin? Height is changing, thus left is less than weight. Jim http://www.unconventional-wisdom.org |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gone Flyin'. -----==0==----- wrote: It's also worth noting that VNE decreases with altitude. Actually, it's not. the true airspeed at which VNE occurs is greater as altitude increases, but the calibrated aurspeed (VNE is defined as a calibrated airspeed) remains the same regardless of altitude. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thats what I told him. This guy is an amazing instructor. He's an MEI
and a CFII with a ton of CFI and CFII singoffs. I was just wondering if we were thinking of two different concepts. My definition of lift being different than his... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
New theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Piloting | 70 | October 10th 04 10:50 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |