If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 8:45:05 AM UTC-5, Dave Walsh wrote:
At 01:24 07 January 2016, Casey wrote: For the cost I would get a self launcher vice a sustainer. I know the Lak = 17 FES can launch but I think they were originally and maybe still calling = it a sustainer. For that kind of money I would want the glider manufacture= to endorse launch. I think the Mini Lak and the Silent endorse launch. I= would hate to have over 100k in a glider and self launch and something go = wrong and insurance not pay off because I was launching a sustainer. Pleas= e correct me if I'm wrong. I do like the ease of use of the FES and think its great It's quite simple: it's either a self launch sailplane or not: look at the specifications. Additionally you are mixing Ultralights (the Silent) with conventional sailplanes (the LAK17B FES). My understanding is that is NOT legal, in Europe, to self launch the LAK17BFES (or indeed any other true "sustainer" sailplane). It's been done of course but it makes no sense with an electric power plant, what little battery power you started with has now gone so you have no useful sustainer performance left. Why would you even think that's a good idea? The Silent Electro is a different (lighter) animal, designed as a self launch. You could launch to a modest height and have some sensible retrieve capability but you're sitting in a fragile (compared to a modern sailplane) structu lower Va, lower Vne etc. It's very nicely built and a joy to rig. It's not much cheaper than a LAK17BFES......choices. That's kinda my point. But if I was a manufacture of anything. I would not come out with my best to begin with. I would come out with a sustainer and let the high rollers buy. Then come out with a more powerful self launcher. The high rollers will sell their sustainers for the self launchers. I bet auto manufactures do this as well as other companies. I realize the specs of the Lak and Silent 2 Electro. Same system in 15m gliders. I would not call the Silent a ultralight with an empty wt of 452 lbs and VNe 137 mph. I would call it a 13.5m conventional. Just like I would not classify a 15m with an 18m or 20m. All are different. Now the Sparrow Hawk I would classify as Ultralight. And for the sake of discussion I can substitute the GP 14 VELO for the Silent 2. Same VNe as and empty wt as Lak 17. http://www.gpgliders.com/gp-14-e-velo 13.5m class= Alisport Silent, GP 14 Velo, Mini Lak, Albastar AS 13.5, And you are right...Its a sustainer or self launcher. Just like its a 13.5m or 15m or 18m or 20m, flapped or not. I'm just saying I would not spend the money on a sustainer if I could get a self launcher. Someone that lives closer to a tow would choose differently. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
Jets may be more thirsty than 2 stroke sustainers but the extra power and speed makes the additional fuel cost pale into insignificance - even more so when you think of it a a proportion of the capital and running costs of a new glider.
Electric will obviously evntually win out but battery technology is advancing only slowly compared to other technologies and the capital costs remain expensive. I don't know the cost of FES batteries but I reckon I could buy around 8000 litres of jet fuel for the cost of a set of Antares batteries - maybe more. I used about 100 litres last summer including a lot of testing rather than retrieve use. ( But I do rather fancy the GP14E Velo!) |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
Not sure I'd agree with your thinking on the marketing of the
sustainer and the self-launch glider (ignoring the Ultralights; incidentally the Silent Electro is an ultralight in Europe). As a long time owner of several self-launch sailplanes I'd say self launch buyers and sustainer buyers tend to have different priorities. Self launchers are heavier, costlier and more complex: unless you do a lot of flying (say 200 hours per year) their real running costs are more than a conventional sailplane. Plus their glide performance, especially in weak conditions, is worse: this is a real drawback. And when they breakdown the costs can be truly fantastic: look up the cost of rebuilding a Solo or rotary engine or, worse, buying a new engine. Against this is the hard to quantify "independence" and the ability to get home (usually). Remember all self-launch owners are complete masters of that branch of accounting known as "man maths". Sustainer owners and buyers are a much saner bunch; lower costs, lighter weight, minor (or nil) performance loss and you still get home (usually). Not sure many go from sustainer to self launch? I can see self launch owners going to FES though. Dave Walsh |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
While I hear the advantage of other type of power - I think more people are comfortable throwing a switch, than firing up a jet or hoisting a boom. And I have never been around any engine that uses fuel and did not smell bad.
Plus you have to explain to your wife that you just purchased a jet, when she thought you were going to fly around the airport safe and sound lol I still think pilots who are real racing pilots will go powerless and the vast majority of us would be more comfortable flipping a switch even if a Jet has that 007 appeal. WH1 |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 1:55:26 AM UTC-4, Luka Žnidaršič wrote:
Dear gliderpilots! Manufacturers are not completely sure which is the way to go. So here you can vote for your favorite sustainer system: http://www.front-electric-sustainer.com/voting.php Thank you, Luka How about an electric powered shrouded fan that produces 50 lbs of thrust! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBkkJdwF2Lo |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 8:45:05 AM UTC-5, Dave Walsh wrote:
My understanding is that is NOT legal, in Europe, to self launch the LAK17BFES (or indeed any other true "sustainer" sailplane). The MINI LAK 13.5 is being developed as a self-launch LSA (European spec LSA). I understand that it would get a Self-launch Experimental Glider Airworthiness Certificate in the USA. It has a lowish pilot weight limitation of 87 kg (192 lbs). It is less expensive than the Silent Electro II FES self-launch. Blanik America has a brochure and quotes a price. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 10:45:11 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
The MINI LAK 13.5 is being developed as a self-launch LSA (European spec LSA). Correction: They're aiming for Ultralight in Europe (less than 300 kg all up weight). |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
On Thursday, 27 September 2012 00:06:31 UTC+2, wrote:
For me electrical sustainer in a glider is the perfect solution. It links in to the spirit of the sport, beter than a turbine. But the propellor on the nose feels slightly off.... Especially when you consider the bugwipergarages becoming standard on the topsailplanes. We are spending more and more on reducing drag. Then this minor addition feels going against the flow. Why not a small pilon whit this nice foldable propellor you have engineered? Or am I the only one who has this uncomfortable feeling? How about FES in an EDF (electric ducted fan) configuration instead of pylon mounted FES? The EDF could be mounted in the fuselage with doors than open and close for the inlet and exhaust. Would this make any sense or be simpler than a pylon mounted system? Would a smaller prop size make it less efficient and impractical? The one advantage would be the removal of most of the pitching issue associated with pylon mounted systems. If I had the money for a self launcher or sustainer equipped glider it would be FES due to simplicity, reliability and safety. From a safety perspective I presume a battery fire would tend to be more isolated in a crash whereas with combustible fuel you and the glider could become engulfed in flames within seconds as fuel is splashed around. As battery and fuel cell technology advances, alternative energy storage upgrades could be a possibility without having to purchase another glider. I don't like the smell of gasoline or jet fuel nor the complexity with things that operate at high temperatures and need to be maintained regularly. A brushless electric motor can literally run for years with a decent set of bearings. That means less hassle and maybe lower maintenance costs over the long run depending on the battery technology being used. A sustainer option would suite me perfectly. I don't need to operate autonomously and a winch launch to 1500 feet is cheap ($4.70 USD) and preserves power for when I may need it. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?
Approximate prices as of spring 2015...
D2c 18m - 68k Euro D2cT 18m - 85k Euro D2c FES 18m - 93k Euro All plus VAT. All plus loads of "Options" By the time you've added a trailer & sensible instrument fit you're looking at around 150k Euro inc VAT, so difference between "traditional" turbo & FES is less than the variation in exchange rates from week to week (Or day to day at the moment!) KN At 16:44 07 January 2016, Dan Marotta wrote: I haven't compared that price to the price difference on a new glider with and without a FES but I would guess that it was in line with buying a new glider. Travel, shipping, and lodging costs are considerable for the duration of the installation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Front Electric Sustainer | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 28 | January 31st 13 01:32 AM |
would an electric sustainer be practical | Brad[_2_] | Soaring | 7 | July 24th 09 06:29 PM |
Which Came First, the Santa Monica Airport, Or Those Who Chose To Build Their Homes Adjacent To It? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 16 | May 7th 07 10:34 PM |
BAF or CEF? I chose BAF. | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 23rd 04 04:33 PM |
DG goes the sustainer option. | Paul | Soaring | 25 | June 4th 04 12:16 AM |