A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 22nd 10, 11:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Peter F[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

Hi All,

DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to the
Duo are due to changes in the flutter requirements imposed on them by the
FAA. They claim that any new designs would have to meet these new
requirements and so the light control forces of the Duo would be unable to
be replicated in any new designs.

Schempp Hirth have a new design, the Arcus.

So...

Does the Arcus have the light controls of the Duo?
Does it meet the Flutter requirements of the FAA?
Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?

PF

(Not in a position to buy Duo / Arcus or DG1001, just curious!)

  #2  
Old October 22nd 10, 01:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:53:10 +0000, Peter F
wrote:


DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to the
Duo are due to changes in the flutter requirements imposed on them by the
FAA. They claim that any new designs would have to meet these new
requirements and so the light control forces of the Duo would be unable to
be replicated in any new designs.


As usual, the DG marketing is lacking.
The cause for the seemingly lighter controls of the Duo Discus is
simply its extremely long stick und huge deflection angles.


Does the Arcus have the light controls of the Duo?

Yes.

Does it meet the Flutter requirements of the FAA?

Obviously.

Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?


Nope... they simply just have better marketing... and a longer stick.



Andreas
  #3  
Old October 22nd 10, 11:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
soarboy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Oct 22, 5:28*am, Andreas Maurer wrote:

Does it meet the Flutter requirements of the FAA?


Obviously.

Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?


Nope... they simply just have better marketing... and a longer stick.


Andreas


Goes to show you: Walk Softly and carry a Big Stick
  #4  
Old October 23rd 10, 04:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Barry[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Oct 22, 5:40*pm, soarboy wrote:
On Oct 22, 5:28*am, Andreas Maurer wrote:

Does it meet the Flutter requirements of the FAA?


Obviously.


Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?


Nope... they simply just have better marketing... and a longer stick.


Andreas


Goes to show you: Walk Softly and carry a Big Stick


My experience is the controls are lighter on the Arcus vs the Duo

ARC
  #5  
Old October 24th 10, 02:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Kevin Neave[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

At 12:28 22 October 2010, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:53:10 +0000, Peter F
wrote:


DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to

the
Duo are due to changes in the flutter requirements imposed on them by

the
FAA.
Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?


Nope... they simply just have better marketing... and a longer stick.



Andreas


Doesn't having the correct length of stick count as "Better at designing
control systems"?

By biggest issue with the DG505 (And DG1000 is similar) is lack of pedal
adjustment in the rear

Kevin

  #6  
Old October 22nd 10, 01:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Oct 22, 6:53*am, Peter F wrote:
Hi All,

DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to the
Duo are due to changes in the flutter requirements imposed on them by the
FAA.


FAA has nothing to do with this. You mean EASA...

They claim that any new designs would have to meet these new
requirements and so the light control forces of the Duo would be unable to
be replicated in any new designs.


No.


Schempp Hirth have a new design, the Arcus.

So...

Does the Arcus have the light controls of the Duo?


I haven't flown Arcus yet, but by reputation control forces are
a bit lighter than Duo.

Does it meet the Flutter requirements of the FAA?


Not sure but I believe Arcus has already received EASA certification.

Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?


Until you fly an Antares, you don't know what
a good control system with light forces is.
Try moving the stick on an Antares on the
ground sometime. Really.

PF

(Not in a position to buy Duo / Arcus or DG1001, just curious!)


Ready to help you with an order for an Arcus Electric,
Best Regards, Dave "YO electric"
  #7  
Old October 22nd 10, 02:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Peter F[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

At 12:51 22 October 2010, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Oct 22, 6:53=A0am, Peter F wrote:
Hi All,

DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to

the
Duo are due to changes in the flutter requirements imposed on them by

the
FAA.


FAA has nothing to do with this. You mean EASA...


According to DG it was a stipulation by the FAA

http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/dg1000-flattern-e.html

...


(Not in a position to buy Duo / Arcus or DG1001, just curious!)


Ready to help you with an order for an Arcus Electric,
Best Regards, Dave "YO electric"

It'll be a long wait, 2nd hand Arcus unlikely to be in my price bracket
'til 2030.
But there's always the change of a lottery win at odds of 14 million to 1
against

PF

  #8  
Old October 24th 10, 04:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
ventus2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

Are S-H just better at designing control systems than DG?

Yes, but lets not limit that to just control systems. :-p

Until you fly an Antares, you don't know what
a good control system with light forces is.
Try moving the stick on an Antares on the
ground sometime. Really.


I think you may see some cross influence down the line with Lange and
Schempps, so that the difference in control force assumptions will be
negligible.

Chris

  #9  
Old October 23rd 10, 08:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 961
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Oct 22, 11:53*pm, Peter F wrote:
Hi All,

DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to the
Duo


I've flown both a Duo (once) and DG1000 (frequently), but not back to
back. The DG1000 has heavy controls? In what universe? It's *far*
lighter than the Janus (especially!) and Twin Astirs we had before the
DG1000s.
  #10  
Old October 23rd 10, 08:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Derek C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 114
Default Arcus Mass Balance / Control forces

On Oct 23, 8:08*am, Bruce Hoult wrote:
On Oct 22, 11:53*pm, Peter F wrote:

Hi All,


DG claim that the heavier controls on the DG1000 / 1001, compared to the
Duo


I've flown both a Duo (once) and DG1000 (frequently), but not back to
back. The DG1000 has heavy controls? In what universe? It's *far*
lighter than the Janus (especially!) and Twin Astirs we had before the
DG1000s.


Heavier stick loads are better for ham fisted glider pilots. Schempp-
Hirth gliders typically have very light controls, especially the
Standard Cirrus. I personally like flying both the DG1000 and the Duo
Discus. The only issue I have with the handling of the DG1000 is the
stick mounted spring trimmer lever which doesn't work properly. I
won't even mention its carp (anag) retractable undercarriage. Oh
sorry, I just did!

Derek C

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arcus E (electric) first flight ! Dave Nadler Soaring 5 September 22nd 10 01:13 PM
Arcus - first impressions Andreas Maurer Soaring 1 July 7th 09 01:35 PM
Maiden flight of the Arcus Nick Olson[_2_] Soaring 30 April 21st 09 12:09 AM
[PICTURES] Arcus 1st flight fred Soaring 0 April 8th 09 06:38 PM
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 22nd 04 02:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.