Why was Bush assigned a second rate plane?

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the trouble.
And it turns out they were right.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 12:44 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the
trouble.
And it turns out they were right.


Arthur Kramer

I thought you said you would stop initiating off topic posts. I see your word
is meaningless.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Subject: Why was Bush assigned a second rate plane?
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 12:44 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the
trouble.
And it turns out they were right.


Arthur Kramer

I thought you said you would stop initiating off topic posts. I see your
word
is meaningless.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



This is a military aviation NG. The subject of my post was military aviation.
You still can't read.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Why was Bush assigned a second rate plane?
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 12:44 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL
they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the
trouble.
And it turns out they were right.


Arthur Kramer

I thought you said you would stop initiating off topic posts. I see your
word
is meaningless.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



This is a military aviation NG. The subject of my post was military
aviation.
You still can't read.

WrongO again there Art Ya Old Fart. Your subject line: "Why was Bush
assigned a second rate plane?" indicates BUSH as the subject.

Tis you that cannot read.

Ed

Anyone wanting to bring back a draft should consider Art's behavior as a
strong disincentive . . .

The last thing a professional military needs is more men and women of weak
character and intellect.

Steve Swartz

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 12:44 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the
trouble.
And it turns out they were right.


Arthur Kramer

I thought you said you would stop initiating off topic posts. I see your
word
is meaningless.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Why did the US Air Force have them? You saying your military is
second rate?

"ArtKramr" wrote

Guess it was all they figured he could handle. And when he went AWOL they
didn't even bother to come after him. They figured he wasn't worth the trouble.
And it turns out they were right.

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:00:31 -0500, Bob Coe wrote:

Why did the US Air Force have them? You saying your military is
second rate?

Why?
When they were designed they were probably high performance
for the time. However high performance was a swiftly moving
target in those days.
Reading the literature there were designs that entered service
obsolete or served no more than five years or so and were
discarded or passed on to the ANG.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

Bob Coe wrote:

Why did the US Air Force have them?

What plane DID Bush fly?

Asbjorn
--
To reach me by e-mail, please use _sheridan at babcon dot org_.

In article ,
on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:50:53 +0200,
Do not answer attempted to say .....

Bob Coe wrote:

Why did the US Air Force have them?

What plane DID Bush fly?

F-102, but then you knew that already..


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Tank Fixer wrote:

In article ,
on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:50:53 +0200,
Do not answer attempted to say .....


Bob Coe wrote:


Why did the US Air Force have them?

What plane DID Bush fly?


F-102, but then you knew that already..

Thanks, I certainly did not. Maybe I should, but I didn't.

Asbjörn
--
To reach me by e-mail, please use _sheridan at babcon dot org_.