737-400(3) - "N980ST Fisheye.jpg" yEnc (1/40)

On 2012-07-21 20:00:30 -0700, Glen in Orlando said:

image

Glen,
As always I am thankful to all who take the trouble to post their AC
images in ABPA. However, I have two things to note with your current
"N980ST" posts.

First, 13.78 MB, 17.03 MB, & 10.21 MB, now while it's nice to have full
resolution images, files of that size are enough to make any Usenet
client choke! Like you I am using Unison and I experienced my first two
crashes of Unison before I was successfully able to view your images.
(Nice work, BTW.)
# 2 for example is massive at 3555 x 5357 @ 17.3 MB, since you are
using a Mac, it is quite simple to open the JPEG in "Preview" use the
"resize" tool and just select one of the presets. I resized your big
image to 1280 x 849 with a drop in file size from 17.3 MB to 445 KB,
with no blatantly obvious image degradation for online viewers.

Secondly, containing the file name within quotation marks can hide the
..jpg extension for most readers. I know I found it unusual.

Here is your #2 resized.




--
Regards,

Savageduck

Thanks for the resize… i use this so infrequently I often forget...

Glen in Orlando wrote in news:500c2ddc$0$18057
:

Thanks for the resize… i use this so infrequently I often forget...


Question what kind of image pprocessing di you use

On 2012-07-22 16:15:32 -0700, clairbear said:

Glen in Orlando wrote in news:500c2ddc$0$18057
:

Thanks for the resize… i use this so infrequently I often forget...


Question what kind of image pprocessing di you use

I suspect that there is more than a touch of Topaz and/or some unsubtle
HDR (subtle HDR is achievable).

Not to everybody's taste, but they are still AC images.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

Savageduck wrote in
news:2012072217055743658-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom:

On 2012-07-22 16:15:32 -0700, clairbear said:

Glen in Orlando wrote in news:500c2ddc$0$18057
:

Thanks for the resize… i use this so infrequently I often forget...


Question what kind of image pprocessing di you use

I suspect that there is more than a touch of Topaz and/or some unsubtle
HDR (subtle HDR is achievable).

Not to everybody's taste, but they are still AC images.

The grainy look denitel is characteristic of HDR I work it in Nik HDR pro
nas in HDR pro in CS6 and CS5
HDR is good where you want a gritty look but with these image is would be a
bit much I am wondering if the original exposrur was off as it looks abit
like a lot of image processing may have been needed to gt the right final
exposure Sometimes that will give you unwanted noise or that grainy look