![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reminded, in an off line conversation, that UV intensity increases
with altitude. Therefore, the skin cancer risk that I always regard as exagerated at sea level is much more worthy of concern--and therefore of prevention--at altitude. The higher you go the more important it gets, and sailplanes spend a lot of time above 15,000 feet; but even my own plans to fly a lot between 8,000 and 10,000 feet mean that this issue deserves a lot more attention than I have been giving it. Canopies by Ray Poguette of ThermoTecUSA.com were mentioned in the conversation, giving excellent UV protection. A tinted version for reduced heating is also offered. (Required disclaimer: I have no connection to this company) A quick web search also yeilded a little information on a GE product called "Solar Control Lexan" which is stated to be both cold bendable and heat formable and which they are recommending as a clear cover for excalator tunnels--which might be exposed to sun, rain, and hail. The Lexan is advertised as an IR (heat) blocker, and may also be an inherent UV blocker--I do not know whether all, or only some, polycarbonates are UV blockers--only that the polycarbonate used for eyeglass lenses is rated at 99% UV suppression. In addition, I found some references to scratch resistant UV blocking coatings to be placed on the outside of windows and scratch resistant IR coatings to be placed on the inside. The bottom line is that canopies which are transparent to visible light, but nearly opaque to both UV and IR are coming soon--and some may be here already. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wear eyeglasses when I fly that have "Transitions" lenses that
automatically darken when exposed to UV light. I don't know if they react only to UV-A or UV-B, but they appear to be a convenient (although uncalibrated) test instrument for how much UV the canopy admits. While flying in bright sunlight in the mid-teens, my eyeglasses only get a little dark; less than I would prefer. My conclusion is that my bubble canopy is filtering out most of whichever UV rays the eyeglasses respond to. I wear sunscreen and I'm not worrying about skin cancer related to flying. Based on my experience with my eyeglasses in friends' airplanes and cars, it seems that airplane canopies and car windshields filter out much of the UV radiation. I don't know if that's inherent in the materials themselves or if manufacturers add something to filter UV. Dennis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dennis Johnson" wrote in message . .. I wear eyeglasses when I fly that have "Transitions" lenses that automatically darken when exposed to UV light. I don't know if they react only to UV-A or UV-B, but they appear to be a convenient (although uncalibrated) test instrument for how much UV the canopy admits. While flying in bright sunlight in the mid-teens, my eyeglasses only get a little dark; less than I would prefer. My conclusion is that my bubble canopy is filtering out most of whichever UV rays the eyeglasses respond to. I wear sunscreen and I'm not worrying about skin cancer related to flying. Based on my experience with my eyeglasses in friends' airplanes and cars, it seems that airplane canopies and car windshields filter out much of the UV radiation. I don't know if that's inherent in the materials themselves or if manufacturers add something to filter UV. Dennis I don't know--or at least I know a lot less than I thought that I knew. My current clear polycarbonate lenses seem to do a better job of filtering out UV (or whatever made me squint a lot before) than the photo-grey-extra lenses they replaced. However, the polycarbonate lenses that I have are rated as 99% opaque to UV, and the photo-grey-extra lenses darkened with visible light. I was not aware that another type of transition lens was available--but it is an additional feature to watch for in window/canopy material. I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. Typical window glass is nearly 90% opaque to UV; but glass that is nearly transparent to UV is also available--and is/was very commonly used, at venues such as home shows, to facilitate the demonstration of film coatings for windows. Obviously, that was not its real purpose; but I don't know what the real purpose might have been. Acrylic is currently a big unknown--at least to me. I don't know how opaque or transparent it might be to either IR or UV, or what range of formulations might be available. What I did find, from a web search, was that both UV and IR blocking coatings appear to be available--however, I tried to find the reference again and I am not at all sure that it isn't really a film--which might not be usefull for a canopy. At this point, all that I really know with any certainty is that one canopy manufacturer does offer a UV blocking canopy, and that most automobile windows block nearly 90% of UV. Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. I have a pair of glasses that darken (don't remember what they are called) that are safety glass rated, and have an anti scratch coating applied, also. They filter UV and have proven to be more scratch resistant by a couple levels of magnitude better than any others I have ever had. Could it be that they finally figured out how to make a good scratch resistant coating? I don't know the answer, but they are far better than the other coatings I have gotten in the past. Nice, too, that they came from Wally World, so the price was right. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. I have a pair of glasses that darken (don't remember what they are called) that are safety glass rated, and have an anti scratch coating applied, also. They filter UV and have proven to be more scratch resistant by a couple levels of magnitude better than any others I have ever had. Could it be that they finally figured out how to make a good scratch resistant coating? I don't know the answer, but they are far better than the other coatings I have gotten in the past. Nice, too, that they came from Wally World, so the price was right. -- Jim in NC I don't know, but it's very possible. Although mine don't change color, the scratch resistant coating has been remarkably effective. There are no discernable scratches after a couple of years--despite treating them as though they were glass. I hope that something as sturdy turns out to be available for canopies and windows. Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Peter Dohm" wrote: I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. I have a pair of glasses that darken (don't remember what they are called) that are safety glass rated, and have an anti scratch coating applied, also. They filter UV and have proven to be more scratch resistant by a couple levels of magnitude better than any others I have ever had. Could it be that they finally figured out how to make a good scratch resistant coating? I don't know the answer, but they are far better than the other coatings I have gotten in the past. Nice, too, that they came from Wally World, so the price was right. -- Jim in NC I don't know, but it's very possible. Although mine don't change color, the scratch resistant coating has been remarkably effective. There are no discernable scratches after a couple of years--despite treating them as though they were glass. I hope that something as sturdy turns out to be available for canopies and windows. Peter Plexiglass II UVA has been around for decades! It filters out UV A, but I don't know about UV B. It is the stuff from which aircraft canopies, windows, windshields, etc. have been made for at least the past 45 years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() In article , "Peter Dohm" wrote: I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. I have a pair of glasses that darken (don't remember what they are called) that are safety glass rated, and have an anti scratch coating applied, also. They filter UV and have proven to be more scratch resistant by a couple levels of magnitude better than any others I have ever had. Could it be that they finally figured out how to make a good scratch resistant coating? I don't know the answer, but they are far better than the other coatings I have gotten in the past. Nice, too, that they came from Wally World, so the price was right. -- Jim in NC I don't know, but it's very possible. Although mine don't change color, the scratch resistant coating has been remarkably effective. There are no discernable scratches after a couple of years--despite treating them as though they were glass. I hope that something as sturdy turns out to be available for canopies and windows. Peter Plexiglass II UVA has been around for decades! It filters out UV A, but I don't know about UV B. It is the stuff from which aircraft canopies, windows, windshields, etc. have been made for at least the past 45 years. The only reference I could find was 280 to 400 nonometers, on the RPlastics.com web page. According to the ThermoTecUSA.com web page, that looks like the bottom third of UVB and all of UVA. But, all of that brings up an ... umm ... interesting ... umm ...question .... (Considering that I wasn't the only one on the NG who didn't know this) Do you suppose ... presuming that your timeline is correct ... that OEMs for both civil and military aicraft have been using the "right stuff" ... and that Homebuilders may have been using whatever happened to be lying around at the local plastic distributor? Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Peter Dohm" wrote: "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() In article , "Peter Dohm" wrote: I had simply presumed that all polycarbonate was nearly opaque to UV, that acrylic was not, and that neither had much affect on IR; but there now appears to be a lot more to the story. I now suppose that you may be guessing exactly right that something is added to filter UV--and it could very well be throughout the material or as a coating. In addition, polycarbonate was previously notorious for its poor abrasion resistance, and its inability to be repolished; but the new formulations and/or coatings have drastically improved the durability. I have a pair of glasses that darken (don't remember what they are called) that are safety glass rated, and have an anti scratch coating applied, also. They filter UV and have proven to be more scratch resistant by a couple levels of magnitude better than any others I have ever had. Could it be that they finally figured out how to make a good scratch resistant coating? I don't know the answer, but they are far better than the other coatings I have gotten in the past. Nice, too, that they came from Wally World, so the price was right. -- Jim in NC I don't know, but it's very possible. Although mine don't change color, the scratch resistant coating has been remarkably effective. There are no discernable scratches after a couple of years--despite treating them as though they were glass. I hope that something as sturdy turns out to be available for canopies and windows. Peter Plexiglass II UVA has been around for decades! It filters out UV A, but I don't know about UV B. It is the stuff from which aircraft canopies, windows, windshields, etc. have been made for at least the past 45 years. The only reference I could find was 280 to 400 nonometers, on the RPlastics.com web page. According to the ThermoTecUSA.com web page, that looks like the bottom third of UVB and all of UVA. But, all of that brings up an ... umm ... interesting ... umm ...question ... (Considering that I wasn't the only one on the NG who didn't know this) Do you suppose ... presuming that your timeline is correct ... that OEMs for both civil and military aicraft have been using the "right stuff" ... and that Homebuilders may have been using whatever happened to be lying around at the local plastic distributor? Peter YUP! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Plexiglass II UVA has been around for decades! It filters out UV A, but I don't know about UV B. It is the stuff from which aircraft canopies, windows, windshields, etc. have been made for at least the past 45 years. The only reference I could find was 280 to 400 nonometers, on the RPlastics.com web page. According to the ThermoTecUSA.com web page, that looks like the bottom third of UVB and all of UVA. But, all of that brings up an ... umm ... interesting ... umm ....question ... (Considering that I wasn't the only one on the NG who didn't know this) Do you suppose ... presuming that your timeline is correct ... that OEMs for both civil and military aicraft have been using the "right stuff" ... and that Homebuilders may have been using whatever happened to be lying around at the local plastic distributor? Peter YUP! It certainly looks like you are correct. I found a little more information, although some of the Plexiglas nomenclature is slightly different, on another vendor page at http://www.plexiglas.com/literature/pdf/81.pdf and that one includes graphical presentation of the solar sprectral distribution as well as transmittance of several types of Plexiglas. At the moment, I have not found much on the IR side for Plexiglas, aside from the assertion that coatings exist--and of course the obvious that tinting does reduce overall heating. And, of course, there is also the Solar Control Lexan--which has both the fault and feature that it is not intended to be frangible. That is a feature in the event of bird strikes and also regarded as a fault in some excape situations where a canopy can not be readily opened. BTW, some of the Plexiglas formulations are also asserted to be either non frangible or less frangible. Clearly, more research is indicated and some volunteers are needed. Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Orval Fairbairn" wrote)
"YUP!" (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) We have a winner. g Paul-Mont I know, I know - hypocrite me! ....quoting his entire reply like I did. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bubble canopy / solar heating | Steve S. | Home Built | 12 | August 31st 07 12:44 PM |
Heating the hanger | Gig 601XL Builder | Owning | 50 | December 20th 05 03:13 PM |
continuous carburettor heating? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 9 | September 5th 04 03:45 PM |
Shock *Heating*? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 48 | February 25th 04 03:43 PM |
Pre-heating | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 10 | December 31st 03 06:35 PM |