A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush AWOL Story - New theory comes to light



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 25th 04, 06:39 PM
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush AWOL Story - New theory comes to light

by James Ridgeway
A New Theory for Bush's Low, Low Profile in the Alabama Guard
March 24 - 30, 2004 Mondo Washington this week:

Here's a new twist to the George W. Bush AWOL mystery, in which almost
no one remembers him fulfilling his duties with the Alabama National
Guard. According to an investigation by the Spokane, Washington,
Spokesman-Review, Bush may have been involuntarily removed from being
a pilot due to little-known Human Reliability Regulations. These were
rules to screen out military personnel for mental, physical, and
emotional fitness before letting them handle nuclear weapons and
delivery systems. The regulations affected thousands of pilots and
were used to suspend two Washington State pilots on suspicion of drug
use, although in the end both men received honorable discharges.
snip

The government's reaction to questions about the human reliability
regs merits attention. The White House gave no comment to a
Spokesman-Review reporter, referring questions to the Defense
Department. The National Guard Bureau, now run by a Bush pick from
Texas, said it was under orders not to discuss the story. The bureau's
chief historian also told the Spokane paper he was under orders not to
discuss the topic. The freedom of information officer at the bureau
said her people stopped taking requests on Bush's military service
last month and now refer all questions regarding it to the Pentagon.

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0412/mondo2.php

-----------------------------------------

So bush was grounded cause he was a mental and the coverup continues.
  #2  
Old March 25th 04, 06:51 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:

by James Ridgeway
A New Theory for Bush's Low, Low Profile in the Alabama Guard
March 24 - 30, 2004 Mondo Washington this week:

Here's a new twist to the George W. Bush AWOL mystery, in which almost
no one remembers him fulfilling his duties with the Alabama National
Guard. According to an investigation by the Spokane, Washington,
Spokesman-Review, Bush may have been involuntarily removed from being
a pilot due to little-known Human Reliability Regulations. These were
rules to screen out military personnel for mental, physical, and
emotional fitness before letting them handle nuclear weapons and
delivery systems.


....and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already been
released), clearly and unequivocally.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #3  
Old March 25th 04, 07:18 PM
Republican Double Standard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chad Irby wrote in news:vSF8c.340179$Po1.38448
@twister.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:

by James Ridgeway
A New Theory for Bush's Low, Low Profile in the Alabama Guard
March 24 - 30, 2004 Mondo Washington this week:

Here's a new twist to the George W. Bush AWOL mystery, in which almost
no one remembers him fulfilling his duties with the Alabama National
Guard. According to an investigation by the Spokane, Washington,
Spokesman-Review, Bush may have been involuntarily removed from being
a pilot due to little-known Human Reliability Regulations. These were
rules to screen out military personnel for mental, physical, and
emotional fitness before letting them handle nuclear weapons and
delivery systems.


...and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already been
released), clearly and unequivocally.

Not all his records were released.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.

Right. I mean, after all, someone like George W. Bush could never get
someone in the government to do him any favors.


--
"We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
- George W. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.
  #4  
Old March 25th 04, 08:55 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:vSF8c.340179$Po1.38448
@twister.tampabay.rr.com:


...and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already been
released), clearly and unequivocally.

Not all his records were released.


His discharge papers were. A failed HRP would be right in there, and
next to impossible to erase.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.


Right. I mean, after all, someone like George W. Bush could never get
someone in the government to do him any favors.


Not at that level. Tampering with HRP documents is the sort of thing
that would get you some prison time.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #5  
Old March 25th 04, 09:29 PM
Republican Double Standard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chad Irby wrote in
. com:

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:vSF8c.340179$Po1.38448
@twister.tampabay.rr.com:


...and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already
been released), clearly and unequivocally.

Not all his records were released.


His discharge papers were. A failed HRP would be right in there, and
next to impossible to erase.

According to the story out of Seattle, the two washington guardsmen did
not have any mention of failed HRP in their discharge papers - and they
both received honorable discharges just like George WMD Bush did.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.


Right. I mean, after all, someone like George W. Bush could never get
someone in the government to do him any favors.


Not at that level. Tampering with HRP documents is the sort of thing
that would get you some prison time.

Please. 20 years ago a bunch of criminals set up their own foreign
policy group outside the government and how much jail time did they do?


--
"We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
- George WMD. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.
  #6  
Old March 25th 04, 11:33 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Please. 20 years ago a bunch of criminals set up their own foreign
policy group outside the government and how much jail time did they do?


About the same amount of time a bunch of criminals who discussed
assassinating US Congressmen did.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #7  
Old March 26th 04, 12:46 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chad Irby wrote:

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:vSF8c.340179$Po1.38448
@twister.tampabay.rr.com:


...and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already been
released), clearly and unequivocally.

Not all his records were released.


His discharge papers were. A failed HRP would be right in there, and
next to impossible to erase.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.


Right. I mean, after all, someone like George W. Bush could never get
someone in the government to do him any favors.


Not at that level. Tampering with HRP documents is the sort of thing
that would get you some prison time.


Let's be real here.

During Reagan/Bush Sr. we had Iran/Contra.

How many people went to prison over that?

It's a simple matter to have someone doctor, or remove, documentation
from any branch of the government.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #8  
Old March 26th 04, 02:44 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Tempest wrote:

Let's be real here.


If we were being "real," this whole silly story would have died about
four years back.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #9  
Old March 26th 04, 09:52 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's a simple matter to have someone doctor, or remove, documentation
from any branch of the government.


Another "vast right wing conspiracy" huh?


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #10  
Old March 26th 04, 11:53 PM
Leslie Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And you think "Iran/Contra" was what, exactly?

I'm interested from a purely clinical point of view- you know, like trying
to determine exactly what "Bush tried to steal the election" means in terms
of a psychosis.

Steve Swartz



"Tempest" wrote in message
...


Chad Irby wrote:

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:vSF8c.340179$Po1.38448
@twister.tampabay.rr.com:


...and if he had, it would be in his records (which have already

been
released), clearly and unequivocally.

Not all his records were released.


His discharge papers were. A failed HRP would be right in there, and
next to impossible to erase.

Since it is not, it's hogwash.

Right. I mean, after all, someone like George W. Bush could never get
someone in the government to do him any favors.


Not at that level. Tampering with HRP documents is the sort of thing
that would get you some prison time.


Let's be real here.

During Reagan/Bush Sr. we had Iran/Contra.

How many people went to prison over that?

It's a simple matter to have someone doctor, or remove, documentation
from any branch of the government.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror PirateJohn Military Aviation 1 September 6th 03 10:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.