Why are multiple engines different?
Mark writes:
On a light twin, that second engine will have just enough power
to get you to the scene of the accident.
I keep reading that, but I wonder to what extent it's actually true.
Apparently some twins are much more handicapped by a lost engine than
others. It seems to me that if a twin is seriously crippled by the
loss of an engine, it may be better to just go with a single, since
the statistical probability of an engine failure is higher for a twin.
On the other hand, if the twin can fly in a useful way for a time even
after losing an engine, it would give you an extra margin of safety
over a single.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
|