![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark writes:
On a light twin, that second engine will have just enough power to get you to the scene of the accident. I keep reading that, but I wonder to what extent it's actually true. Apparently some twins are much more handicapped by a lost engine than others. It seems to me that if a twin is seriously crippled by the loss of an engine, it may be better to just go with a single, since the statistical probability of an engine failure is higher for a twin. On the other hand, if the twin can fly in a useful way for a time even after losing an engine, it would give you an extra margin of safety over a single. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 03:55 PM |
| Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 11:14 PM |
| P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 02:09 AM |
| U.S. Air Force Moves Ahead With Studies On Air-Breathing Engines | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 04:31 AM |