![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:35:16 +1100, George Ghio
wrote: wmbjk wrote: On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:05:32 +1100, George Ghio wrote: When a lie becomes industry-accepted terminology then the industry is in deep ****. It was never a "lie" except in your ignorant vernacular. And for an industry in "deep ****" it seems to be doing rather well overall. "Modified Sq. Wave" is just that. Sine Wave is not stepped. sigh You might correct your error by listing some popular "sine" wave inverters, and the number of steps in their "not stepped" waveforms. Yes Mildred there really are true sine wave inverters that are not just a sq. wave with many, many steps. Another unsupported claim by Mr. Hole Digger. But at least you've admitted in weasel-speak that some snorf "sine" wave inverters *do* have stepped waveforms. Would you say that they're manufactured and sold by liars? Do your own ****ing search. I take that to mean that you won't be providing any examples of sine wave inverters with stepless waveforms. What a shocker. Wayne |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on 172 M electrics... (1974 Skyhawk II) | [email protected] | Piloting | 8 | April 10th 04 05:52 AM |